Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Rich people couldn't care less; Rich people are more selfish, less empathetic, less generous and less compassionate
Topic Started: 14 Oct 2013, 08:08 AM (405 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Rich people couldn't care less

October 12, 2013
Julia Baird

Congratulations, Australia! We are now the richest people on the planet. Officially loaded. According to the Credit Suisse 2013 Global Wealth Report, released this week, our median wealth - $233,504 - is higher than any other country. (Granted, for those pedants who actually prefer to measure average wealth, Switzerland beats us - but we still come second! - with $425, 603.)

This has been almost entirely driven by the fact that property prices have risen here, while they have slumped in the US and Europe.

It's surely something to celebrate on a gloriously sunny weekend, as boat motors idle, and beetles crawl on newly renovated patios, right? Esteemed economists have, after all, shown a nation's happiness is clearly linked to its GDP.

There are only two small problems.

First, most of the money is going to those who are already affluent. Over the past three decades, almost half of our growth in income has gone to the top 10 per cent of the wealthiest people. As reported by Fairfax Media, in a lecture at Melbourne University this week, the former director for employment, labour and social affairs at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation, John Martin, cited new OECD data showing almost a quarter of all growth in our household income from 1980 to 2008 went to the top 1 per cent.

Economist and Labor MP Andrew Leigh believes this number is inflated - in his book Battlers and Billionaires, he claims 13 per cent of growth in Australia from 1980 to 2010 went to the top 1 per cent.

Still, it's a skew we don't challenge enough. As Franklin Delano Roosevelt said, the test of progress is provision for the poor, not whether ''we add more to the abundance of those who have much''.

Second, there is a growing body of research on wealth that is overwhelmingly consistent and shows the rich tend to be more selfish, less empathetic, less generous and less compassionate.

Yes, this is a massive generalisation.

But the question is - if it has been proven that rich people lack empathy as individuals, what happens to a nation when it grows fatter, sleeker and wealthier? Are we likely to share more, or less?

First, the research. I know, bagging out rich people is not just a national pastime, but also a historically appealing cliche. Ebenezer Scrooge, Montgomery Burns, Gordon Gekko. It also provides a neat way of pretending we are not ourselves privileged - most people reading this would hover somewhere near the top 10 per cent, as I would myself.

But psychologists have been exploring the effect wealth has on social behaviour, and the evidence has been steadily mounting that the powerful are, in some important ways, less armed with virtue than they are with money.

Studies have found the wealthy are less interested in the needs and motions of others and are not as helpful, compassionate or generous as those who possess less. One study, published in 2010, found people with less money are better at reading faces in a measure called empathy accuracy.

Two psychologists from Berkeley, Paul Piff and Dacher Keltner, have been researching how wealth influences social behaviour for years. In one study, they watched drivers at a congested intersection. They found drivers in luxury cars were more likely to cut off other drivers, and speed past pedestrians. In another study, they asked people to think about where they stood compared to other people, financially. The participants were then given a jar of lollies and told to help themselves to whatever they wanted - and that what was left would be given to children in a lab nearby.

Those who considered themselves affluent took significantly more.

In a further study, wealthier people were shown to be less likely to agree with statements such as ''I often notice people who need help'' and ''It's important to take care of people who are vulnerable''.

Again, when shown videos of cancer patients, the hearts of the less well-off people were more likely to slow down - a classically empathetic response.

Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/comment/rich-people-couldnt-care-less-20131011-2vdb4.html
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums with no limits on posts or members.
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy