Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Under scrutiny: How far does the property media industry go to protect their readers?
Topic Started: 11 Oct 2013, 08:01 AM (803 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Under scrutiny: How far does the property media industry go to protect their readers?

By Stephen Taylor and Jennifer Duke
Thursday, 10 October 2013

We’ve all seen it on TV: the current affairs show crew swoops, industry expert and disgruntled former client in tow, to confront the miscreant. He looks up, caught unawares, and does some fast thinking: to run and hide – hoping to avoid the impending shame - or stand and face the music, try to bluff it out, justify his case and clear his name.

It’s a scene played out almost every week on our major quasi-news programs.

And, just like this, last Friday night’s Today Tonight program exposed building services company, Property Secrets, for taking alleged undisclosed kickbacks. Reporter David Eccleston, and consumer advocate Neil Jenman, claimed the director of the company, Paul Giezekamp, was taking kickbacks from builders that he was not disclosing to clients, and inflating fees.

There were also claims Property Secrets was warned in 2010 by the Fair Trading department over taking undisclosed commissions.

These claims may or may not be true, and Giezekamp has his lawyers looking into his legal options. But what is true is that Property Secrets will be suspended by Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) pending further investigation. This leaves us asking whether other companies should be taking action to protect their consumers.

But, where does this leave the publishers of well known property magazines and organisers of trade shows who effectively – but presumably unknowingly - promote their clients no matter their ethics? Do media outlets’ advertising departments mind that display ads in their pages may come from clients whose shoddy practises cause untold harm to innocent victims – like those featured on Today Tonight?

We assume that they do – but it’s not easy to get verification.

Property Observer set out to ask three of Australia’s biggest property-focused publishers what they did to vet or scrutinise their advertisers so as to safeguard their readers, and how they may react to any allegations about an advertiser. The results were disheartening, with two saying that well placed staff were ‘’in meetings’’ when our reporter called over two days.

No one at Your Investment Property (YIP) magazine would comment. At Smart Property Investment magazine, the following one-line was sent by publisher Andy Scott in response to a chain of emails and phone calls: "As you’re aware Smart Property Investment (SPI) is focused on delivering factual, informative and timely information to property investors. We’re in the process now of gathering content to report to the market on this particular issue and will publish information this week offering insights for our readers."

It was crucial to this story that SPI was given an opportunity to comment, not least because company director, Phillip Tarrant, sits on the board of PIPA. Unfortunately, mentioning this point to them did not help elicit a response and a chain of emails went unanswered. We'll be interested to read these insights over the next day and a half.

Currently, Property Secrets advertises with both of these titles, inlcuding the most recent editions of the investment titles, in the prominent back page position. We stress that these would have been published before the Today Tonight story was aired.

We don’t set out to demonise them for having these advertisements in this issue of their magazines, and certainly we’re still waiting for more information on what is occurring around Property Secrets ourselves.

What, in fact, we were interested in was their approach to advertisements in the next magazines that they’re currently putting together, and what stage it needs to get to for advertising to be pulled. Clearly, advertising does generate leads and build a brand perception, or advertisers would not pay money for these positions. As a result, it leaves many in the industry in a position of a substantial power.

The two main questions we had been keen to receive answers to from the magazines included:

What is the process undertaken to check advertisers’ credentials/ethics?

What will happen in response to the allegations – will advertising be pulled until further evidence comes to light, or until the situation is cleared up?

The advertising manager of Australian Property Investor (API) magazine, Laurie O’Brien, was more forthcoming with information. This may be because, currently, Property Secrets does not advertise with the title. However, they have had Property Secrets as an advertiser in the past.

"API magazine doesn’t have a written policy but accepts advertising in good faith from companies that they expect operate in the best interests of their customers.

"We’d prefer to avoid companies that may have reputations for questionable business practices. At the end of the day I don’t want to have readers contacting me saying, ‘I’ve been ripped off by one of your advertisers’, so, of course, we aim to run adverts by reputable firms.

"We don’t have a crystal ball. There have been companies who advertised with us - and also probably in major magazines, metropolitan newspapers and other media – who went broke and hurt a lot of people and we certainly don’t want to be a part of that.

"If we know companies have a bad track record or have been shown to have deceived customers we avoid accepting their advertising – but it’s very hard to know first up.

"It would be different if we chased their business after we knew they had been cheating or misleading customers.

"I take advertisements in good faith but if I know a company is disreputable I stand clear."

Of course, this article wouldn’t be fair without shining the light back on ourselves as a publication. With this in mind, we asked our own advertising department about our ‘checks and balances’ and what their approach would be if something came to light about an advertiser.

"If a client was proven to be operating in a manner that was adverse to the best interests of the consumer than we would refuse to accept their advertising, as per our advertising terms and conditions," said Private Media’s (publisher of Property Observer) publishing director Marina Go.

She also pointed us to the company’s advertising Terms and Conditions.

The following clauses in particular stand out: ‘By submitting advertising material to us or authorising or approving the publication of advertising material by us on your behalf, you warrant that the advertising material complies with all relevant laws and regulations and that its publication will not give rise to any claims or liabilities against us, our partners, our directors, employees or agents.

‘Without limiting the above, you warrant that the advertising material submitted, authorised or approved by you does not breach or infringe the Trade Practices Act (Cth), the Fair Trading Acts of relevant states of Australia or equivalent or other sale of goods legislation; any copyright, trade mark, obligation of confidentiality or other personal or proprietary rights; any law of defamation, obscenity or contempt of any court, tribunal or royal commission; State or Commonwealth anti-discrimination legislation; the Privacy Act (Cth); or any other law (including but not limited to any common law, statute, delegated legislation, rule and ordinance of the Commonwealth or any state or territory).

This means controversial advertising would get pulled, assuming that there were substantial allegations against the company, and not just gossip, they clarified to us in an email.

It can be a difficult time for publishers trying to discern between the two.

We also approached popular expo, the Home Buyer and Property Investor Show, to ask them about their approach to curating and who is able to have a stand at the show. Clearly, their responsibilities here are just as crucial with hundreds of 'mum and dad' investors and home buyers wandering through their doors all across Australia on an annual basis.

We were unable to be provided a comment for the article as their spokesperson is interstate, however we were provided some useful clarification. From a legal stand point, show organisers can’t appear to discriminate or be restrictive against a potential client. They often seek advice from Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) on a potential client’s bona fides.

PIPA's membership requirements are listed here.

Speaking to Property Observer, the Real Estate Buyer's Association of Australia (REBAA) president Jacque Parker said that any time buyer's agents do the wrong thing it is disappointing for the industry and does make things more difficult to present the best information to consumers.

One way they vet members is to ask for endorsement by two current members, provide one year of 'associate' membership and put in place minimum standards. These include a code of ethics, that the member is a licensed real estate agent, and that they have indemnity insurance.

Parker noted that they had knocked back membership previously, but that to her knowledge Giezekamp had never sought membership with REBAA. This is the REBAA's membership application.

The most common reasons for knocking back membership applications included that they didn't have the right insurance and that the majority of their business did not operate as a buyer's agency.

"The best advice I can give is to call the Office of Fair Trading and find out if any complaints have been made against them," Parker said.

At the end of the day, readers will always be urged to undertake their own due diligence over any expert they use. This is regardless of whether they are advertising or have been quoted in the media, or if they are associated with a certain body.

Read more: http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/under-scrutiny-how-far-does-the-property-media-industry-go-to-protect-their-readers/2013100965608
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Billy Jack
Member Avatar
The Duke of Brisbane Town

Friend, see the post here about the "Real Bubble" Y'all can see the realities. It's like that movie "The Matrix".

The media is everything friend. Here's why.
Tell Billy Jack the Truth
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
themoops
Member Avatar
Ruby Member
Billy Jack
11 Oct 2013, 09:36 AM
Friend, see the post here about the "Real Bubble" Y'all can see the realities. It's like that movie "The Matrix".

The media is everything friend. Here's why.
I don't need to watch your video to know why, it's because people are morons.
stinkbug omosessuale


Frank Castle is a liar and a criminal. He will often deliberately take people out of context and use straw man arguments.
Frank finally and unintentionally gives it up and admits he got where he is, primarily via dumb luck!
See here
Property will be 50-70% off by 2016.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Blondie girl
Member Avatar


This is certainly a can of worms.

Does the media itself have vested interests ? ...yeah, we are a democracy but there really is no freedom of the press.

Law & ethics is studied simultaneously for a reason.
Newjerk? can you try harder than dig up another person's blog. My first promo was with Billabong and my name in English is modified with a T, am Perth born but also lived in Sydney to make my $$
It's Absolutely Fabulous if it includes brilliant locations, & high calibre tenants..what more does one want? Understand the power of the two "P"" or be financially challenged
Even better when there is family who are property mad and one is born in some entitlements.....Understand that beautiful women are the exhibitionists we crave attention, whilst hot blooded men are the voyeurs ... A stunning woman can command and takes pleasure in being noticed. Seems not too many understand what it means to hold and own props and get threatened by those who do.
Banks are considered to be law abiding and & rather boring places yeah not true . A bank balance sheet will show capital is dwarfed by their liabilities this means when a portions of loans is falling its problems for the bank.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy