I was thinking something more along this style with steps up top the verandahparking and laundry under
I have liked the look and idea of shipping container homes and have looked into them previously
Fuck you are dumb. Thinking about something does not a venture make. Like I said, I asked a question, which also does not a venture make.
Its the same sort of retarded thought process that crazydave, goldbug, mmm has when it claimed I had somehow failed financially by looking at a block of land at rocklea - that I didn't buy.
Ignore posts by The Whole Truth · View Post · End Ignoring The forum fuckwit goes RRRAAARRRGGHHhhh - But not a fuck was given..................by anyone.
If the shut down continues but the debt ceiling is raised as necessary, which now looks likely, it'll be win-win. Less wasteful government spending and no default.
Unless you have a US holiday organised and you'd like to visit a tourist attraction. Luckily I don't.
Whenever you have an argument with someone, there comes a moment where you must ask yourself, whatever your political persuasion, 'am I the Nazi?'
Unless you have a US holiday organised and you'd like to visit a tourist attraction. Luckily I don't.
There's no reason why the government should run tourist attractions using lazy uncompetitive government workers and management. It seems the purpose of rangers in the National parks is to prevent people bathing without their chest covered, to prevent them drinking a glass of wine with their lunch outside of zoned areas, and prevent them smoking in the back country.
Fuck you are dumb. Thinking about something does not a venture make. Like I said, I asked a question, which also does not a venture make.
Its the same sort of retarded thought process that crazydave, goldbug, mmm has when it claimed I had somehow failed financially by looking at a block of land at rocklea - that I didn't buy.
Fuck you are dumb. Thinking about something does not a venture make. Like I said, I asked a question, which also does not a venture make.
Its the same sort of retarded thought process that crazydave, goldbug, mmm has when it claimed I had somehow failed financially by looking at a block of land at rocklea - that I didn't buy.
Hey guys ideas are good. Come on now. Years ago they where all the rage to use as storage systems. A friend of the family told me to be carful as some where used as chemical transporters and may contain residues. For what it is worth. Peter
newjez
11 Oct 2013, 06:10 PM
Unless you have a US holiday organised and you'd like to visit a tourist attraction. Luckily I don't.
You can just drive up to Canada, much better there. Peter
There's no reason why the government should run tourist attractions using lazy uncompetitive government workers and management. It seems the purpose of rangers in the National parks is to prevent people bathing without their chest covered, to prevent them drinking a glass of wine with their lunch outside of zoned areas, and prevent them smoking in the back country.
I thought their job was to find the bits the bears didn't like. I've never liked bears (the grizzly variety) I'd much rather take my chances with sharks.
Whenever you have an argument with someone, there comes a moment where you must ask yourself, whatever your political persuasion, 'am I the Nazi?'
Americans are very pissed off, mostly with the GOP. But 6 out of 10 would sack the whole bloody lot if they could.
Quote:
Poll Finds GOP Blamed More for Shutdown Party Scores Lowest Marks in 20-Plus Years; Mood Also Darkens About the Economic Impact of the Government Standoff By Neil King Jr.
Americans have come to hold a harshly negative view of the Republican Party during the government shutdown, giving the GOP a far larger share of the blame for a political brawl that many believe is harming the economy, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found.
The poll of 800 Americans found scant confidence that President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress can find a way out of the morass, with nearly eight in 10 saying the country was on the wrong track—the highest number since the worst of the recession in 2008.
At a time of weak confidence in the economic recovery, the government impasse in Washington has delivered an unusually sharp blow to public faith in the elected leaders and their stewardship over the economy, the poll found.
Participants in the poll gave the Republican Party overall its lowest marks in the history of Journal polling, which goes back to 1989: More than twice as many hold a negative view of the GOP as a positive one. By contrast, the number of Americans viewing the Democratic Party positively or negatively was nearly equal, at about 40%.
In all, 53% of those polled blamed Republicans for the shutdown, compared with 31% who blamed Mr. Obama—numbers that showed the GOP taking a worse beating than the party did 17 years ago during the last extended shutdown, under President Bill Clinton.
Asked about the current budget battle, 70% of participants faulted Republicans in Congress for putting their political agenda ahead of what's good for the country. In a separate question, 51% said Mr. Obama was more concerned about his agenda than the good of the country. The public was divided over the president's refusal to negotiate with Republicans unless they reopen the government and raise the federal debt ceiling, with 40% agreeing with his stand and 43% disagreeing.
A large majority of those polled, or 63%, said it was "a real and serious problem" that Congress might not raise the country's borrowing limit.
Republican voters are at odds over how their party should proceed in its fight with the White House. More than a third of Republicans disapproved of how their party's members in Congress are doing their job, while nearly 40% said congressional Republicans were putting the party's agenda above the good of the country.
At the same time, tea-party-oriented participants now look more favorably on the party than other Republicans who don't ally with tea-party goals. The poll, conducted between Monday and Wednesday, had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4%.
Pollsters for the Journal and NBC said the survey marked some of the most dramatic shifts they had seen in decades in public attitudes toward the well-being of the country, the direction of the economy and wider political sentiment.
The number who thinks the economy will worsen over the next year—42%—has nearly doubled since September, while the number who think the country is on the right track has fallen by half.
Bill McInturff , a Republican pollster who conducted the poll along with Democratic pollsters Fred Yang and Peter Hart , called the data "toxic" and noted key areas in which the GOP had suffered from what he called "an ideological boomerang" contrary to the outcome sought when members of the party launched the budget fight last month.
The Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll was based on nationwide telephone interviews of 800 adults, including a sample of 240 who use only a cellphone. It was conducted from Oct. 7-9, 2013, by the polling organizations of Bill McInturff at Public Opinion Strategies and Fred Yang at Hart Research Associates. The sample was drawn in the following manner: Individuals were selected proportionate to the nation's population in accordance with a probability sample design that gives all landline telephone numbers, listed and unlisted, an equal chance to be included. Adults age 18 or over were selected by a systematic procedure to provide a balance of respondents by sex. The cellphone sample was drawn from a list of cellphone users nationally, and respondents were screened to ensure that their cellphone is their only phone. The data's margin of error is plus or minus 3.46 percentage points. Sample tolerances for subgroups are larger.
Republicans initially demanded full funding of the government be contingent on money for the Affordable Care Act health law being eliminated. Half of those polled oppose that stance, up from 44% last month.
The poll also showed a slight uptick in support overall for the health law and a larger jump, to 52%, in support of the government doing more to solve people's problems.
"On a number of key indicators, the public has moved in the opposite direction from what Republicans hoped they would," said Mr. McInturff.
"What is stunning about these results is just how hard and how quickly public attitudes have landed on the shutdown," said Mr. Hart, noting how the poll underscored "a broad disgust for the political system."
Six in 10 Americans said, if they could, they would defeat and replace every member of Congress. Among the disaffected was Frank Tillerson, a 64-year-old Democrat in Panama City Beach, Fla., who called the fight over the debt ceiling "a ticking bomb" that both parties have to defuse.
"There's going to have to be give and take on both sides," he said. "If they don't, this is a matter that can't be settled."
Others have seen their own views shift. Linda White, a 64-year-old Republican from McDonald, Tenn., said she initially faulted her own party but now blames Mr. Obama and the Democrats as "not willing to compromise."
It's a shame that their parliamentary system effectively means that they have no choice between Republicans and Democrats. I'm grateful for a preference system even if it does occasionally put someone like Clive Palmer in control.
It's a shame that their parliamentary system effectively means that they have no choice between Republicans and Democrats. I'm grateful for a preference system even if it does occasionally put someone like Clive Palmer in control.
The Yanks sort of have that as a result of the lack of party discipline. Look at the Tea Party - definitely a party within a party.
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off. --Gloria Steinem AREPS™
Americans are very pissed off, mostly with the GOP. But 6 out of 10 would sack the whole bloody lot if they could.
notice the questions are like. How much damage will the shutdown do?? Why don't they ask how much good will the shutdown do. This is total propaganda. 100% Be careful. Peter From Gnarabup :pop:
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy