Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Why you shouldn’t believe the property bubble story - the numbers don’t stack up; Weak credit growth, low debt servicing ratios, low rate of non-performing bank loans
Topic Started: 23 Sep 2013, 10:32 PM (735 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Why you shouldn’t believe the property bubble story

Monday, September 23 2013 at 10:22 AM
BY ADAM CARR

There are ongoing claims that a price bubble is forming across the Australian residential property market, but the numbers don’t stack up. But even if it was, don’t worry about being in property. Policy makers will let the market run its course, unless they have major concerns around a deterioration in credit conditions.

Weak credit growth, low debt servicing ratios and a low rate of non-performing bank loans suggest we are a very long way from a housing price bubble.

The topic of a housing bubble has attracted a lot of attention this past week, although in truth the talk has been around a lot longer.

Now, up front, and while I think a housing bubble is a real risk, investors shouldn’t be scared off.

Firstly, and as other commentators have noted, we are not in a bubble now and no reasonable person would suggest this. You can see this most simply by noting that house prices nationally are only up five per cent for the year – and this largely reflects price growth in Sydney (six per cent year-on-year) and Perth (11 per cent year-on-year). In other cities, house price growth has been modest. For example, Melbourne (three per cent year-on-year), Brisbane (3.7 per cent year-on-year) and Adelaide (0.6 per cent year-on-year). Looking over a longer horizon – the last five years say – house prices are only up about 15 per cent or so. That’s a growth rate of around three per cent per year. There’s nothing bubble-like about that.

Posted Image

So far that’s pretty simple then, and as far as investors are concerned that should be the end of the discussion at this current juncture. The problem is that many people think we will – it’s inevitable, according to an ex-RBA Board member – go into a housing bubble down the track. And I think this is a legitimate concern.

Yet there are two issues investors need to consider at this point:

Timing and bubble action

The timing of any bubble, and what action, assuming we did have one, policy makers would take to address it. That’s because it will be the policy response that poses the biggest threat to your investment.

Obviously, the question of timing (bubble now or later) is important for investors, because if we were in a bubble now you would avoid, and I would recommend avoiding, property like the plague. The expectation of a bubble down the track yields a different response, however. I mean let’s be blunt. It’s all the more reason to gain a first-mover advantage – all the more reason for investors to buy now. And that’s not as risky or as foolhardy as it sounds. Indeed, even if we are headed toward a bubble, or even if it’s only a risk, that doesn’t mean property is too risky to play – a game only for the brave or short-term speculators.

For me, I’m confident property remains attractive as a medium to long-term investment – bubble or not – and that’s because of the second issue investors need to consider. And that is, the policy response.

The policy response

This is ultimately the reason why I don’t think investors shouldn’t be scared off by talk of a bubble – now or later. Put simply, policy makers aren’t likely to do anything about it. And this is what matters. Why would they do nothing? Well, there are a few reasons:

1. Firstly, there is no well-defined or accepted definition of a ‘housing bubble’. That being the case, it is unlikely policy makers, or the broader community, will ever agree on the existence of a bubble at any given point. Rising housing prices themselves do not necessarily indicate a bubble – no matter how high they go. Take Sydney – there is no stock, the population is growing by about 1.5 per cent per year, incomes growth is solid, and interest rates are at record lows. Why wouldn’t prices rise strongly? A bubble implies some ‘irrational exuberance’ or some departure from fundamentals.

Even if I’m wrong on that, and by some miracle people could agree on the definition, we are a long way from that point. This is because, and as I’ve discussed in past notes, house price growth has been quite modest (on average) for many years. In fact, price growth has actually been below income growth in most cities for about a decade now.

Posted Image

Similarly, there is no sign of debt distress. We are a long way from that. Debt-to-disposable income levels are high, sure, but this is a misleading statistic. What matters is the ability to service that debt.

Nationally, debt servicing ratios are around decade lows (at around nine per cent of income), and the RBA’s own research notes no evidence of mortgage stress – highlighting that that only three to four per cent of households with debt could be characterised as having ‘high gearing and debt servicing ratios’ (see the above chart 2 from the RBA). That is a debt serving burden of 50 per cent or more, and of those 40 per cent have a buffer. Indeed, the aggregate household buffer is about 20 months of repayments.

So if there are no signs of debt distress and only a tiny fraction of households are heavily geared. Add to that the fact that banks have a very low proportion of non-performing loans – less than one per cent (see chart 3 below from the RBA). Then how could the central bank possibly mount an argument to intervene, no matter how hard prices run? The answer is it couldn’t, and the fact is it wouldn’t even try. That’s provided loans are being made to people who can repay them – which touches on the second reason policy makers would do nothing.

Posted Image

2. Think about this. Should, for some reason, there be an agreement on the definition of a bubble (highly unlikely) there is no agreement in policy circles about what action should be taken – if any. The prevailing wisdom had been, and I haven’t seen strong evidence this has changed much, that policy is better placed to clean up after a bubble has burst than to try and prick it. The GFC has changed this thinking at the margin, but not by much. The argument now is that more harm would be done trying to prick an asset bubble than letting it run its course, unless that asset bubble is accompanied by a rise in credit. And then, not just any old rise in credit, but a harmful rise – risky credit. This includes ‘low-doc’ lending to low income earners etc., or sub-prime lending if you want to think of it in American terms. I would add to that a glut of actual housing stock.

Even in that instance, the current wisdom is that intervention should be more targeted, rather than left to a generalised increase in the cash rate. This is where the IMF and others suggest ‘macro prudential controls’ (just another term for regulation), and central banks from New Zealand, Sweden and Canada have used these to limit lending. Yet, these controls aren’t intended to head off rapid house price growth or stop a price boom. They are only to restrict lending to high-risk (of default) households. In fact, policy makers in economies currently experiencing rapid house price growth aren’t really doing anything to mitigate the actual price momentum. And neither would the RBA. While that may sound odd given the GFC, the consensus still argues that more harm would be done in trying to address rapid house price growth – to the rest of the economy – than in letting it run its course (unless accompanied by a risky credit or a surge in housing stocks as discussed above).

Conclusion

To conclude then, investors have very little to fear and everything to gain from a housing bubble – whatever that is.

Firstly, there is no agreement on what a price bubble actually is, and secondly there is no agreement on what the policy reaction should be if there was one. The policy consensus appears to be that a house price boom should be left to its own devices, unless it is accompanied by a harmful surge in credit growth.

Current indicators – weak credit growth, low debt servicing ratios, and a tiny rate of non-performing bank loans – suggest we are a very, very long way from that.

Read more: http://www.apimagazine.com.au/api-online/news/2013/09/why-you-shouldnt-believe-the-property-bubble-story
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Expat
Default APF Avatar

Lost me right here:

"we are not in a bubble now and no reasonable person would suggest this. You can see this most simply by noting that house prices nationally are only up five per cent for the year "

"and as far as investors are concerned that should be the end of the discussion at this current juncture"


Forgive my ignorance, but is the existence of a bubble wholly reliant what prices did the preceding year?

Not saying there isn't better evidence to support the no bubble way of thinking, but this seems irrelevant to me. Certainly not an "end of discussion".
O dear, I blinked while posting and accidentally read some more:

"To conclude then, investors have very little to fear" "Firstly, there is no agreement on what a price bubble actually is"


I think I dislike stupid bulls even more than the smug ones. :lol

Edited by Expat, 23 Sep 2013, 11:25 PM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


Expat
23 Sep 2013, 11:16 PM
Lost me right here:

"we are not in a bubble now and no reasonable person would suggest this. You can see this most simply by noting that house prices nationally are only up five per cent for the year "

"and as far as investors are concerned that should be the end of the discussion at this current juncture"


Forgive my ignorance, but is the existence of a bubble wholly reliant what prices did the preceding year?

Not saying there isn't better evidence to support the no bubble way of thinking, but this seems irrelevant to me. Certainly not an "end of discussion".
Catweasel laugh.

No the doubt,

expert miss every the bubble,

because it never the see,

based on its narrative.

So how does it know its narrative is a right wrong?

It need to form the hypothesis it not want to a believe,

and test it to a death.

But that a problem with a bubble science.

It cannot test like in a physical the world.

So all it got

is narrative to lob at mouse,

though a beloved media.

It like feeding the ducks at pond,

except mouse sometimes become loyal lap dog.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
those
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
Adam Carr is a leading economist in the Australian market. In addition to being a columnist with Business Spectator, he has worked with some of the world’s largest investment banks and financial intermediaries. Adam was also formerly an economic adviser with the Prime Minister's Department and Commonwealth Treasury.


This really scares me. Surely this guy should have some other profession. Maybe something like driving a bus?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community.
Learn More · Register Now
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy