Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
Capitalise the gains? US government getting bailout money back
Topic Started: 16 Sep 2013, 08:52 PM (1,397 Views)
stinkbug
Member Avatar


http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/news/economy/bailout-profit/index.html?hpt=hp_bn1

Looks like the US govt might actually make a profit on the money used to bail out the various big screw ups during 2008. Interesting...
---------------------------------------------------------------

While it's true that those who win never quit, and those who quit never win, those who never win and never quit are idiots.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
hoofarted
Member Avatar


lol... Profit!

You guys..... :tu:
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
genX
Default APF Avatar


stinkbug
16 Sep 2013, 08:52 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/news/economy/bailout-profit/index.html?hpt=hp_bn1

Looks like the US govt might actually make a profit on the money used to bail out the various big screw ups during 2008. Interesting...
Wow. The US government is so good at value investing we should do away with capital markets altogether and just allocate capital by government committee.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
b_b
Default APF Avatar


stinkbug
16 Sep 2013, 08:52 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/news/economy/bailout-profit/index.html?hpt=hp_bn1

Looks like the US govt might actually make a profit on the money used to bail out the various big screw ups during 2008. Interesting...
Oh good news. That means the government is less likely to run out of USD.
(S – I) + (T - G) + (M - X) = 0
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
stinkbug
Member Avatar


genX
16 Sep 2013, 09:18 PM
Wow. The US government is so good at value investing we should do away with capital markets altogether and just allocate capital by government committee.
Uh, I was making the point that maybe the US govt got away a bit easier than they thought they would...
---------------------------------------------------------------

While it's true that those who win never quit, and those who quit never win, those who never win and never quit are idiots.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
genX
Default APF Avatar


stinkbug
16 Sep 2013, 09:27 PM
Uh, I was making the point that maybe the US govt got away a bit easier than they thought they would...
Yes, capitalism is saved. I think the moral of the story is that if you are a large institution, there are no longer any risks, there is only upside. I'm ready to party, how about you?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


stinkbug
16 Sep 2013, 09:27 PM
Uh, I was making the point that maybe the US govt got away a bit easier than they thought they would...
The last couple of years, the US govt has been quietly racking up the fines on the banks for their various behaviours before, during and after the GFC and if anything it is accelerating. It's probably not in the hundreds of billions yet, but it is in the high tens of billions.
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
--Gloria Steinem
AREPS™
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
stinkbug
Member Avatar


genX
16 Sep 2013, 11:12 PM
Yes, capitalism is saved. I think the moral of the story is that if you are a large institution, there are no longer any risks, there is only upside. I'm ready to party, how about you?
That's not how I view it.
---------------------------------------------------------------

While it's true that those who win never quit, and those who quit never win, those who never win and never quit are idiots.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Foxy
Member Avatar
Zero is coming...

stinkbug
16 Sep 2013, 09:27 PM
Uh, I was making the point that maybe the US govt got away a bit easier than they thought they would...
Great post Stinkbug.
Point is the U.S. government is creating a reality. And attempting to maintain it.
It prints onto a pieces of paper a number with some nice pictures. People myself included carry out activity to acquire these pieces of paper or the Australian equivalent.
If this can be maintained you have order, if you have order you have power.
So maybe don't think of it as getting their money back or making a good investment.
If they can maintain the system of order under a value belief system they control everything in that system.
Think of it as religion if you can have everyone believe in say Catholicism you have order, a line of communication if you could think of it as such.
If you would like me to go into this in more detail please let me know.
Just replace every level and component of the financial system with it's religious equivalent and you will start to get the picture.

To nutshell this concept.

If the people stop believing in your financial system "assets and money are worth nothing" other than art or scrap value.
If no one believes in Catholicism anymore the religious icons have no value other than their components for scrap or artistic value.

I am not Catholic and respect peoples right to believe in their religions.
I used Catholicism because it is widely understood in our community.
Peter from Perth




http://www.afr.com/content/dam/images/g/n/2/1/u/8/image.imgtype.afrArticleInline.620x0.png/1456285515560.png
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
genX
Default APF Avatar


stinkbug
17 Sep 2013, 07:18 AM
That's not how I view it.
Allow me to expand then. The government can create as much money as it wants by issuing bonds. It doesn't need to get any of the TARP money back. Not one dollar. The success of capital markets is dependent on the best allocators of capital being rewarded, and the worst punished by going out of business. The governments role in capital markets is to regulate them to prevent cheating, so the aforementioned function of reward and failure can take it's course.

The bailout money, regardless of the amount, or whether or not it is paid back is irrelevant. The government failed to regulate the market, then compounded it's failure by allowing the cheats and the incompetent to remain in business. The damage to the government was never about how much of the bailout money they were going to get back, but who they gave it to in the first place. In fact, you could say that getting the bailout money back is an even worse outcome, because the government is the worst allocator of capital of all.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy