No doubt written by a hypocrite who maintains and spends on himself an income greater than that of >90% of the rest of the world, and many times that of the average world citizen.
Rich people are always preaching the virtues of government instituted equality but ignore the obvious action available. That is, to give to the extent of reducing their own wealth and income expenditure to something below the world median. Only then will they avoid the hypocrisy of their priggish preachings.
It all reminds me of Band-Aid and arch-hypocrite Bob Geldof yelling, swearing and insulting people much poorer than his rich self to give their money away to his cause, following which he spent a fortune on a jet setting wedding to Yates in Las Vegas.
What a horrible, meanspirited little man you truly are.
Go and find a gated community to live in.
Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?
The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly. Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
What a horrible, meanspirited little man you truly are.
Go and find a gated community to live in.
Well I wasn't meaning to inspire anger. That was the cynic in me coming out. I don't think it's a conspiracy, but for several reasons the rich are getting far richer whilst the poor in the west aren't doing that well by comparison.
I think that self interest is the natural way. We are all greedy to some extent and we all want more acorns than we can eat. For the individual, failing miserably by collecting too many acorns is infinitely better than failing miserably by collecting too few, but we only have so many acorns.
The social implications are far too difficult for me, I'm just another observer.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
What a horrible, meanspirited little man you truly are.
Go and find a gated community to live in.
Well I wasn't meaning to inspire anger. That was the cynic in me coming out. I don't think it's a conspiracy, but for several reasons the rich are getting far richer whilst the poor in the west aren't doing that well by comparison.
I think that self interest is the natural way. We are all greedy to some extent and we all want more acorns than we can eat. For the individual, failing miserably by collecting too many acorns is infinitely better than failing miserably by collecting too few, but we only have so many acorns.
The social implications are far too difficult for me, I'm just another observer.
What people with shitty politics don't understand is that it has fuck all to do with where Bob Geldof goes on his holidays and everything to do with the structural composition of our society and its economy.
Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?
The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly. Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
I and the entire generation of young adults excluded from home ownership have a Plan B.
We rent
Cool, I need more renters, but the more who rent and don't contribute, the tighter the situation gets
Quote:
or live with the Olds.
You assume that they want you around - perhaps they have better things to do than to babysit a kidult indefinately
Ignore posts by The Whole Truth · View Post · End Ignoring The forum fuckwit goes RRRAAARRRGGHHhhh - But not a fuck was given..................by anyone.
I and the entire generation of young adults excluded from home ownership have a Plan B.
We rent or live with the Olds. We save the difference. We invest elsewhere. We educate ourselves. We travel.
In other words, be a sponger and live off of others like a parasite, continually taking advantage of their generosity and good will.
I doubt you consider the wishes of others like the "olds" you sponge off and who's lives you screw, or consider the wishes of your partner who almost certainly will not share your sponging parasitic tendencies.
What people with shitty politics don't understand is that it has fuck all to do with where Bob Geldof goes on his holidays and everything to do with the structural composition of our society and its economy.
Veritas you have no interest in the welfare of low income earners, I know this because as soon as the topic of conversation turns to genuinely helping by providing city planning for low cost housing in satellite towns, or targetted ftbg to crucial occupations, or building more smaller sized affordable housing, it does not suit your agenda at all.
Be honest with yourself it doesn't.
What you are seeking is some kind of way to take from those who currently own, you seek some kind of fire and brimstone to rain down on those who own property? You do not seek low cost housing you seek only to see others lose their money that they have invested in property.
Poor people don't want your sympathy or your anger at folk who achieve, poor people want the same opportunities to achieve for themselves, not your pious puritanical self righteous preaching against wealth generation.
IMHO you are nothing like in agreement with the people you constantly quote as if they support your crash mongering, they don't wish to see any villages burn as you are so fond of saying.
Definition of a doom and gloomer from 1993 The last camp is made up of the doom-and-gloomers. Their slogan is "it's the end of the world as we know it". Right now they are convinced that debt is the evil responsible for all our economic woes and must be eliminated at all cost. Many doom-and-gloomers believe that unprecedented debt levels mean that we are on the precipice of a worse crisis than the Great Depression. The doom-and-gloomers hang on the latest series of negative economic data.
In other words, be a sponger and live off of others like a parasite, continually taking advantage of their generosity and good will.
I doubt you consider the wishes of others like the "olds" you sponge off and who's lives you screw, or consider the wishes of your partner who almost certainly will not share your sponging parasitic tendencies.
Just to put this in context, Strindberg's children hate his guts, so the only time they would consider speaking to him is if they are asking for something.
What you are seeking is some kind of way to take from those who currently own, you seek some kind of fire and brimstone to rain down on those who own property?
Yes Skamy you are right you have caught the bears out again.
Veritas and the Bears are shooter macgavin trying to get your house on the cheap.
Personally I think your scared of ending up in a home and having an orderly look after you!!
Well its a bad year indeed..record prices, strong growth, shithouse time to own property..
Ooooh Btw , finance applications, enquiries & prices have risen substantially, kindly explained by someone that's just more than a Bank Johnny.
Newjerk? can you try harder than dig up another person's blog. My first promo was with Billabong and my name in English is modified with a T, am Perth born but also lived in Sydney to make my $$ It's Absolutely Fabulous if it includes brilliant locations, & high calibre tenants..what more does one want? Understand the power of the two "P"" or be financially challenged Even better when there is family who are property mad and one is born in some entitlements.....Understand that beautiful women are the exhibitionists we crave attention, whilst hot blooded men are the voyeurs ... A stunning woman can command and takes pleasure in being noticed. Seems not too many understand what it means to hold and own props and get threatened by those who do. Banks are considered to be law abiding and & rather boring places yeah not true . A bank balance sheet will show capital is dwarfed by their liabilities this means when a portions of loans is falling its problems for the bank.
Veritas you have no interest in the welfare of low income earners, I know this because as soon as the topic of conversation turns to genuinely helping by providing city planning for low cost housing in satellite towns, or targetted ftbg to crucial occupations, or building more smaller sized affordable housing, it does not suit your agenda at all.
Be honest with yourself it doesn't.
What you are seeking is some kind of way to take from those who currently own, you seek some kind of fire and brimstone to rain down on those who own property? You do not seek low cost housing you seek only to see others lose their money that they have invested in property.
Poor people don't want your sympathy or your anger at folk who achieve, poor people want the same opportunities to achieve for themselves, not your pious puritanical self righteous preaching against wealth generation.
IMHO you are nothing like in agreement with the people you constantly quote as if they support your crash mongering, they don't wish to see any villages burn as you are so fond of saying.
Cool story.
Still waiting on your story about how the Irish economy was brought down by Lehman brothers.
Perhaps today you have time to tell it?
Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?
The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly. Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy
