Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
The Mother of all Property Booms; In your dreams bulls
Topic Started: 16 Sep 2013, 11:05 AM (5,181 Views)
Pig Iron
Member Avatar
Bogan scum

you know it is over when bears want to know just how much property will rise by.
fucken hilarious.
I am the love child of Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
peter fraser
Member Avatar


Veritas
16 Sep 2013, 11:27 PM
What about free primary and secondary schooling? Who loses?
The church
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
barns
Member Avatar


Veritas
16 Sep 2013, 11:27 PM
Who is a universal healthcare system bad for?

What about free primary and secondary schooling? Who loses?
If they are quality public systems:

Private hospitals and some doctors.

Private schools and private school teachers.
“You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means” - Inigo Montoya
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Veritas
Default APF Avatar


peter fraser
16 Sep 2013, 11:29 PM
The church
The point is Peter, as I suspect you know well, is that Western Countries have a rich tradition of creating/intervening in markets in such a way as to produce egalitarian outcomes.

In such cases, egalitarian means that a person's access to essential goods and services are not unduly affected by where they sit in the income distribution.

The housing system runs the risk, if it isnt already too late, of becoming something that runs very much contrary to that most civilized of principles.

And its a great shame.

Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?

The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly.
Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
peter fraser
Member Avatar


Veritas
17 Sep 2013, 12:24 AM
The point is Peter, as I suspect you know well, is that Western Countries have a rich tradition of creating/intervening in markets in such a way as to produce egalitarian outcomes.

In such cases, egalitarian means that a person's access to essential goods and services are not unduly affected by where they sit in the income distribution.

The housing system runs the risk, if it isnt already too late, of becoming something that runs very much contrary to that most civilized of principles.

And its a great shame.
I agree. I have thought for some time that we are seeing a split in western economies between the haves and the have nots. There has always been a divide, but since the western economies ceased wealth redistribution policies during the Reagan/Thatcher years it's become ever more acute.

Families can now accumulate over many generations to build dynasties.

I said as much in a post over at MB - the post was immediately deleted - didn't want to know.

I expect home ownership rates to fall over time. That isn't an endorsement, it's an acknowledgement of what I see.

Property is a factor in everything that we do. we live in it, we work in it, we go to the movies, a restaurant, a game of football, everything takes place in property. It's not an insignificant part of our lives and those who control it will accumulate more wealth and power. When more and more comes into the hands of less and less, they can charge whatever the users can afford to pay. That's what the game of monopoly is all about.

Why are house prices rising in economies that have so recently experienced a house price crash?

If you look at history it's always been so, we are just establishing a new hierarchy to replace an older one.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Shadow
Member Avatar
Evil Mouzealot Specufestor

Veritas
16 Sep 2013, 11:27 PM
Who is a universal healthcare system bad for?

What about free primary and secondary schooling? Who loses?
No public service is really 'free'.

In both cases, the losers include taxpayers who fund the services but don't use them.

Others losers have also been mentioned above.
Edited by Shadow, 17 Sep 2013, 07:56 AM.
1. Epic Fail! Steve Keen's Bad Calls and Predictions.
2. Residential property loans regulated by NCCP Act. Banks can't margin call unless borrower defaults.
3. Housing is second highest taxed sector of Australian Economy. Renters subsidised by highly taxed homeowners.
4. Ongoing improvement in housing affordability. Australian household formation faster than population growth since 1960s.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Veritas
Default APF Avatar


Shadow
17 Sep 2013, 07:50 AM
Veritas
16 Sep 2013, 11:27 PM
Who is a universal healthcare system bad for?

What about free primary and secondary schooling? Who loses?
No public service is really 'free'.

In both cases, the losers include taxpayers who fund the services but don't use them.

Others losers have also been mentioned above.
I never said it was.

What is being discussed is the desirability of a system that creates gross inequality.

See Peter's post above.

I note however that many, many posters on this forum don't do "enlightened self interest" preferring to stick with a basic pig man philosophy on life.

Each to his own.
Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?

The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly.
Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Strindberg
Member Avatar


Veritas
17 Sep 2013, 03:06 PM
I never said it was.

What is being discussed is the desirability of a system that creates gross inequality.

See Peter's post above.

I note however that many, many posters on this forum don't do "enlightened self interest" preferring to stick with a basic pig man philosophy on life.

Each to his own.
..self-righteous, sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, priggish, Anglican style smug crap.

No doubt written by a hypocrite who maintains and spends on himself an income greater than that of >90% of the rest of the world, and many times that of the average world citizen.

Rich people are always preaching the virtues of government instituted equality but ignore the obvious action available. That is, to give to the extent of reducing their own wealth and income expenditure to something below the world median. Only then will they avoid the hypocrisy of their priggish preachings.

It all reminds me of Band-Aid and arch-hypocrite Bob Geldof yelling, swearing and insulting people much poorer than his rich self to give their money away to his cause, following which he spent a fortune on a jet setting wedding to Yates in Las Vegas.
Edited by Strindberg, 17 Sep 2013, 03:51 PM.
Housing costs to Income broadly unchanged since 1994 - re-ratified here
The People of Australia have the highest median wealth in the World
2002-2012 10 year house price growth the SLOWEST since 1952-1962
"There are two kinds of people in this world: ones that fiddle around wondering whether a thing's right or wrong and guys like us." (Hugo to Gagin in Ride the Pink Horse)
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Don't Buy Now!
Unregistered

I and the entire generation of young adults excluded from home ownership have a Plan B.

We rent or live with the Olds. We save the difference. We invest elsewhere. We educate ourselves. We travel.

This youthful energy has been deflected but cannot be denied!

For heaven’s sake, my Barista has $150k saved – on his crap wage. Will he buy? No way! It just doesn’t make sense.

Renting is a bargain, an absolute bargain compared to buying. If land prices remain painfully high in Australia while they have retreated in the Western nations we compare ourselves to (save Canada and NZ) then emigration is a realistic alternative for many.

Even young adults who have never heard of arbitrage can practice it.

And those 1.5 million Negative Gearers? They’re toast.

This is the most awesome Ponzi scheme ever invented. They will run out of working life before rents = outgoings.

Depressed housing credit growth speaks to the grim, determined exit from debt by those who can and the weak appetite for new borrowing by young adults.

This is despite record low interest rates, truly staggering migration levels and a culture that elevates speculating on principal place of residence above passing fads like child-rearing and retirement.

We know there is wave of boomer downsizing immediately ahead.

Ignore this force at your peril.

Don’t Buy Now!
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mel
Member Avatar


Don't Buy Now!
17 Sep 2013, 03:53 PM
I and the entire generation of young adults excluded from home ownership have a Plan B.

We rent or live with the Olds. We save the difference. We invest elsewhere. We educate ourselves. We travel.

This youthful energy has been deflected but cannot be denied!

For heaven’s sake, my Barista has $150k saved – on his crap wage. Will he buy? No way! It just doesn’t make sense.

Renting is a bargain, an absolute bargain compared to buying. If land prices remain painfully high in Australia while they have retreated in the Western nations we compare ourselves to (save Canada and NZ) then emigration is a realistic alternative for many.

Even young adults who have never heard of arbitrage can practice it.

And those 1.5 million Negative Gearers? They’re toast.

This is the most awesome Ponzi scheme ever invented. They will run out of working life before rents = outgoings.

Depressed housing credit growth speaks to the grim, determined exit from debt by those who can and the weak appetite for new borrowing by young adults.

This is despite record low interest rates, truly staggering migration levels and a culture that elevates speculating on principal place of residence above passing fads like child-rearing and retirement.

We know there is wave of boomer downsizing immediately ahead.

Ignore this force at your peril.

Don’t Buy Now!
not having a foot in any property whatsoever might be a foolish play though (even a sub 100K rural IP is a thousand times better than nothing for risk management imho)

the only thing worse than being broke in old age (like me) is being broke and homeless
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy