While the fundamentals of Australia’s housing market may remain solid, and its current performance is robust, there are concerns about what lies around the corner – and we’re talking months, not years.
While the fundamentals of Australia’s housing market may remain solid, and its current performance is robust, there are concerns about what lies around the corner – and we’re talking months, not years.
While the fundamentals of Australia’s housing market may remain solid, and its current performance is robust, there are concerns about what lies around the corner – and we’re talking months, not years.
I am worried about Australia’s housing market. Very worried. Not so much about the fundamentals, which are solid, or current performance, which is robust without raising alarm. I am concerned about what lies around the corner – and here, I am talking months, not years.
I presented at a hedge fund conference during the week with notorious housing pessimist Gerard Minack. There was a fascinating role reversal. Asked about Australia’s housing prospects, Minack said he now buys into the view that house prices will track incomes.
Minack was upfront in admitting that he forecast striking price falls during the global financial crisis – he certainly bandied around figures in the 20 per cent range. He explained that he was wrong because it was “garbage in and garbage out”. The enormous rise in the jobless rate he anticipated never materialised.
This has been a maxim I’ve advocated for years. I’ve regularly demonstrated that domestic housing costs have tracked, or slightly under-clubbed, disposable household income growth since 2003. That’s comforting and what should happen through a cycle. Amid forecasts of catastrophic gloom in 2008 and again in 2011, I attracted criticism for publishing more reassuring views. Price depreciation was likely to be modest, I argued. And if the Reserve Bank of Australia cut rates, the elasticity of our interest rate sensitive housing market would surprise on the upside. This was close to what transpired. RBA cuts have gone too far
But I no longer hold a benign perspective. The RBA’s rate cuts have gone too far. And if they stay this low for too long, there is a real chance Australia could, belatedly, have an acute housing crash with real economy consequences.
While this is not my current central case, several factors give me pause.
The first is that households have not really deleveraged despite much spruiking about our “cautious consumers”. Australia’s elevated household debt-to-income ratio, which looks set to climb further, is not far off the all-time, pre-GFC peak.
APRA has warned banks against being generous with mortgagors, even as shareholders and remuneration packages continue to tempt looser credit.
This highly-leveraged consumer is an artefact of Australia’s even more leveraged banking system. The major banks are leveraged about 80 times across their $4 trillion home loan books. Put differently, they are only holding about $1.25 of true loss-absorbing capital against every $100 – as opposed to the “risk-weighted” value – of their assets.While banks do not “mark to market” their mortgage books with current prices because they account for them on a “hold to maturity” basis, with such extreme leverage you only need a small drop in asset values to make the banking system theoretically insolvent (assuming market prices).
A third issue, which APRA canvassed this week, is that our banking system is under tremendous pressure to maintain its internationally lofty returns on equity. Although default rates are modest, APRA has discovered a worrying rise in the share of home loans approved with risky loan-to-property value ratios. Home loans with LVRs greater than 80 per cent A stunning 33 per cent of new home loans are today being advanced with LVRs greater than 80 per cent. In some countries they don’t even allow banks to lend at these levels, period.
Of course, since the RBA has taken the easy option of slashing borrowing costs to their cheapest levels in history, consumers are being given every incentive to gear back up.
My fear is that the longer rates remain at all-time lows, the greater the likelihood borrowers will believe that this is some sort of “new normal”. That they will extrapolate out from the recent past to the future.
The complacency is compounded by the fact that Australians have not experienced a recession in 22 years. Most have never endured a bone fide housing rout either. The reflex is to think that policymakers will always be there to diversify away downturns.
The reality, however, is that these same officials have exhausted most of our monetary and fiscal ammunition in the name of avoiding what is likely some natural business cycle volatility as the growth pulse migrates from investment to production.
A related anxiety is that the RBA will confront deep resistance to properly normalising rates to the extent required to avoid these imbalances. The risk is that RBA officials talk about accommodating a bout of asset and consumer price inflation because they want to maintain “full employment”.
That they push a so-called “dual mandate” to jobs and inflation despite the inherent short-term conflicts between these goals. One new RBA board member even calls herself a “growth girl”. Housing supply challenge
A final concern is Australia’s housing supply challenge. We do need to build many more homes to accommodate the circa 15 million additional residents that will live here within 35 years.
Developers do require positive price signals to commit scarce capital to constructing new supply.If our mounting supply-side deficiencies are allowed to accumulate we could see an even more exaggerated housing market cycle.
So APRA, the RBA, and their political masters have to work early and actively together to resist the financial system’s innate desire to promote higher indebtedness.
This will necessitate courage given the over the horizon perspective on which it is based, and the array of commercial interests allied against such parsimony.
Definition of a doom and gloomer from 1993 The last camp is made up of the doom-and-gloomers. Their slogan is "it's the end of the world as we know it". Right now they are convinced that debt is the evil responsible for all our economic woes and must be eliminated at all cost. Many doom-and-gloomers believe that unprecedented debt levels mean that we are on the precipice of a worse crisis than the Great Depression. The doom-and-gloomers hang on the latest series of negative economic data.
So what Joye is saying is that it is possible that there might be a boom followed by a crash and that something needs to be done to prevent the boom.
Not quite "Chris Joye Predicts Crash"
Or perhaps they are preventing the crash in the only way they can:
by using monetary policy to create another boom.
Basically, if IRs weren't so low what direction would housing be travelling? Down.
and what happens then? The dreaded deflationary spiral as investors head for the door.
Remember the plan is to rescue the economy be stimulating new home construction and that can only be done by convincing people that prices are on the rise again.
Quite the bind we are in.
Property acquisition as a topic was almost a national obsession. You couldn't even call it speculation as the buyers all presumed the price of property could only go up. That’s why we use the word obsession. Ordinary people were buying properties for their young children who had not even left school assuming they would not be able to afford property of their own when they left college- Klaus Regling on Ireland. Sound familiar?
The evidence of nearly 40 cycles in house prices for 17 OECD economies since 1970 shows that real house prices typically give up about 70 per cent of their rise in the subsequent fall, and that these falls occur slowly. Morgan Kelly:On the Likely Extent of Falls in Irish House Prices, 2007
While the fundamentals of Australia’s housing market may remain solid, and its current performance is robust, there are concerns about what lies around the corner – and we’re talking months, not years.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy
