The RBA's Nominal Recession: Australia just experienced its worst nominal recession since 1992; RBA continues to under-estimate the power of monetary policy
Most of the recent media’s focus on the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has been on the withering character assessment of Kevin Rudd from RBA board member and former Woolworths CEO, Roger Corbett. Which is a shame, because the focus should be on the fact that the June quarter National Accounts revealed that in the 2013 financial year, Australia experienced its deepest nominal recession for two decades, due largely to excessively tight monetary policy.
Although many economists focus on the real GDP estimates, Skeptikoi believes that nominal GDP – which captures growth in real GDP and inflation - is a better indicator of the household and business sectors’ cash flows. The June quarter National Accounts revealed that the nominal economy expanded at an annual average rate of 2.5% in the 2013 financial year. This represents the softest outcome since the last recession, when nominal GDP grew by less than 2% in 1992. And it is well below trend growth in nominal GDP, of 5-6%.
The widely used metric for defining a recession in Australia is two consecutive quarterly declines in real GDP. By this standard, Australia has not had a recession in over two decades. But if a more comprehensive measure of a recession is used, based on annual average growth in nominal GDP falling below a trigger of 4%, then Australia has just experienced its worst nominal recession since 1992. By this measure, the economy was also in recession in the 2010 financial year, a period in which average annual growth in nominal GDP was only 3%.
There is a small but growing view that central banks ought to augment or replace inflation targeting with a nominal GDP targeting framework. On this report card, the RBA scores a fail for two of the past four years. The 15% decline in the terms of trade from its peak, the associated downgrade to the mining sector’s future growth prospects and persistently high value of the Australian dollar are not responsible for the worst nominal GDP growth outcome for two decades. Skeptikoi believes that the RBA ‘owns’ the nominal recession. Despite the record low official cash rate of 2.5%, monetary conditions in Australia remain tight. Credit growth is tepid, the housing recovery is uneven (approvals for private sector detached dwellings remain at a cyclical low) and the much anticipated handover from mining sector capex to non-mining sector capex remains a long way off.
The National Accounts provided some encouraging signs. Nominal GDP posted a 0.9% gain in the June quarter which lifted annualised growth for the June half to 4.5%, while financial sector profits grew by almost 3% to a record high and the terms of trade increased for the second consecutive quarter – albeit marginally – thanks largely to higher iron ore prices. But non-financial sector profits have now declined for six of the past seven quarters and households remain cautious; the household saving ratio continued to creep up and has averaged more than 10% for the past five years, a level not seen since the mid-1980s.
Animal spirits in the business sector remain dormant and this is unlikely to change in the near-term, even given the likely resolution of uncertainty following the Federal election. In it updated Economic Statement release in early August, the Treasury downgraded its growth projection for nominal GDP to 4.25% for the 2014 financial year, enough to lift Australia out of its nominal recession, but only just. The reporting season and cautious guidance comments provided by the ASX200 companies provide further evidence of the unfolding shortfall in aggregate demand. Large companies including RIO Tinto, BHP, Woolworths, Telstra, Woodside Petroleum, Brambles, Coca Cola Amatail (the list goes on) announced plans to further boost productivity, pare back costs, defer capex plans where feasible and in some instances reduce capex from current levels. Companies continue to either hoard cash – net gearing levels remain close to record lows – or cater to the market’s insatiable appetite for income; the aggregate dividend payout ratio for the ASX200 has lifted to 70%, close to an historical high. Corporate Australia’s focus on cost containment is reflected in weakness of the National Accounts measure of unit labour costs – productivity adjusted wages. Despite a modest 0.8% rise in the June quarter, unit labour costs have stagnated over the past year, the first time this has happened since 1999 (ex the financial crisis). The guidance comments from the ASX200 companies in the reporting season suggest that growth in unit labour costs (and inflation) will remain well contained, providing scope for the RBA to further ease policy.
The Economist magazine attributes the reluctance of the Obama administration to intervene in Syria to the lessons learnt from the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Skeptikoi believes that the RBA has been a reluctant rate cutter due to similar ‘overlearning from history’; the view that central banks contributed to the financial crisis by keeping policy too accommodative for too long in the aftermath of the dotcom bust. The moral hazard view of the crisis largely discounts the role of a range of other proximate factors, notably a glut in global savings and strong demand for safe haven assets. Importantly it is not clear that the counterfactual of tighter monetary policies through the early to mid-2000s would have prevented the financial crisis, particularly given that long term interest rates – which at the time central banks had little power to influence – continued to decline to record lows during this time.
The RBA would be well placed to learn the lessons from policy errors committed by the Federal Reserve over the past century. David and Christina Romer present a persuasive thesis that the most dangerous idea in the history of the Federal Reserve is that monetary policy doesn’t matter, a view which they argue contributed to the Great Inflation of the 1970s and Great Depression. The more the RBA seeks to jawbone the Australian dollar lower – without much success - the more Skeptikoi is convinced that the RBA continues to under-estimate the power of monetary policy to re-balance the economy, revive the business sector’s animal spirits and boost nominal GDP. In time, Skeptikoi hopes that the RBA’s record as a reluctant rate cutter and its ownership of Australia’s nominal recession will come under greater scrutiny.
But if a more comprehensive measure of a recession is used, based on annual average growth in nominal GDP falling below a trigger of 4%, then.......gloom...doom...gloom..
Bears love gloom even if they have to reinvent words to get it. Yes, if we are allowed to invent our own definitions of a recession we can surely invent one which shows that Australia has always been in recession and will never leave it.
The widely used metric for defining a recession in Australia is two consecutive quarterly declines in real GDP. By this standard, Australia has not had a recession in over two decades. But if a more comprehensive measure of a recession is used, based on annual average growth in nominal GDP falling below a trigger of 4%, then Australia has just experienced its worst nominal recession since 1992. By this measure, the economy was also in recession in the 2010 financial year, a period in which average annual growth in nominal GDP was only 3%.
Cool. Redefine the word "recession" and you can have a recession anytime you want. If inflation ever raises its ugly head again, you can redefine a recession as being two consecutive quarters where (real GDP change - cash rate) < 0. That could work.
Quote:
There is a small but growing view that central banks ought to augment or replace inflation targeting with a nominal GDP targeting framework.
Yeah proponents went from 1 to 2 over the past 3 months. that's 1500% annualised!
Yeah proponents went from 1 to 2 over the past 3 months. that's 1500% annualised!
What a crock of shit.
don't worry about it miw - you are in a position to view a seeming endless sea of beautiful Chinese women at your leisure. There are people out there who would pay good money for that privilege
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Leisure? Only a couple of days ago you were saying it was my job.
my bad miw - personally when i was king pimp of Beijing in the 1960's I did take pleasure in my job. You really need to reassess your values and have a good think about what you have just said. 24 hour suspension.
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Cool. Redefine the word "recession" and you can have a recession anytime you want. If inflation ever raises its ugly head again, you can redefine a recession as being two consecutive quarters where (real GDP change - cash rate) < 0. That could work.
Yeah proponents went from 1 to 2 over the past 3 months. that's 1500% annualised!
What a crock of shit.
It is just a label. It doesn't really mean anything. There is no real difference between an economy that is flatlining, and one that has a mild recession. It's not the difference between life and death. It's the difference between sick and a little bit sicker.
You can measure growth in a lot of ways. One that doesn't get used much is growth in GDP per person. I would love to see an international comparison chart of this if there is one handy.
It is just a label. It doesn't really mean anything. There is no real difference between an economy that is flatlining, and one that has a mild recession. It's not the difference between life and death. It's the difference between sick and a little bit sicker.
There is a huge difference between GDP growing at 4% and a GDP which is falling. Its like saying comparing low inflation with deflation and say there is no real difference ... The difference is huge!!
I put trolls and time wasters on my ignore list so if I don't respond to you, you are probably on it ....
It is just a label. It doesn't really mean anything. There is no real difference between an economy that is flatlining, and one that has a mild recession. It's not the difference between life and death. It's the difference between sick and a little bit sicker.
You can measure growth in a lot of ways. One that doesn't get used much is growth in GDP per person. I would love to see an international comparison chart of this if there is one handy.
Definition of a doom and gloomer from 1993 The last camp is made up of the doom-and-gloomers. Their slogan is "it's the end of the world as we know it". Right now they are convinced that debt is the evil responsible for all our economic woes and must be eliminated at all cost. Many doom-and-gloomers believe that unprecedented debt levels mean that we are on the precipice of a worse crisis than the Great Depression. The doom-and-gloomers hang on the latest series of negative economic data.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy
