Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
The NBN is no longer a Liberal election priority; Those rat bastards
Topic Started: 3 Sep 2013, 03:39 PM (541 Views)
mel
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
Apparently the NBN is no longer a Liberal election priority

For all the ferocity with which Tony Abbott’s Liberals have attacked Labor’s NBN, you would think they perceive it to be an incredibly important issue. Turns out the Liberals perceive it as so unimportant that it doesn’t even rate in the party’s list of six key priorities.

After perusing official Liberal Party campaign material – which was this week dropped in the letterbox of everyone living in Andrew Robb’s federal electorate of Goldstein – this is the only conclusion I can reach.

“The six key priorities of the next Liberal Government”, the headline on the four-page brochure says above a picture of those who would be our overlords come September 8. There’s Malcolm Turnbull, right at the end off the table next to Robb – who is, remember, shadow finance minister and chairman of the Coalition Policy Development Committee – and Joe Hockey, Tony Abbott, Julie Bishop and Warren Truss.

While shadow communications minister Turnbull has a seat at the table, his would-be ministry wasn’t so lucky: there is not a single mention of the NBN or broadband, not even in the usual pejorative Labor-stinks-and-we’ll-do-the-NBN-better sense, anywhere throughout the four pages of Liberal Party propaganda.

The NBN didn't even get its rightful place alongside pink batts and school halls as an example of Labor's "uncontrolled spending and failed schemes".

Nope: if this brochure is correct, the NBN simply doesn’t rate as a Coalition election priority at all. Which seems to be a pretty big omission given that Tony Abbott has committed the rather significant sum of $29.4 billion to the project, and has already promised – at the launch of his party's campaign, no less – that one of his first priorities if elected will be to get stuck into the NBN and issue a revised business plan within 100 days.

Malcolm Turnbull argued the same thing, saying in his recent debate with Alan Kohler that the NBN review was the Coalition's "single most important piece of work in the first 100 days" and that it would try to complete its NBN review within 60 days of the election.

From the makeup of its policy brochure, the rest of Abbott's leadership team clearly thinks otherwise. They may be simply letting Turnbull believe what he wants to believe, keeping him busy with the NBN while they get on with other priorities.

Of course, this isn’t exactly the most accurate brochure for other reasons: for example, point six is the promised creation of two million jobs. This sounds great as rah-rah policy – but if you consider that Australian Bureau of Statistics figures indicate there are only 701,600 unemployed people in Australia – it appears a key Liberal Party policy is to create 1.3m additional jobs for Australians that don’t actually exist. Perhaps this is how the Coalition plans to finish the NBN on time.

Accurate maths has never been the Coalition’s strong point, with Turnbull happy to inflate the projected cost of Labor’s NBN at every opportunity (his latest estimate is that it will cost “well over $100 billion”) and Abbott somehow doing maths that suggest it will take 80 years to complete the Tasmanian NBN.

Come to think of it, Labor has had its own maths lapses, such as Anthony Albanese’s insistence that under a Coalition policy end users could pay as much as $50,000 for an on-demand fibre connection. Clearly, we didn’t pick these people based on their maths excellence.

Labor has not, of course, completely forgotten the NBN in its campaign advertising; rather, it’s feting the project, for all its bumps and rattles, as a real policy success with tangible impact on voters.

Given the coalition’s usual insistence on countering such claims, one wonders why the Coalition excised all references to the NBN from its print advertising – especially when the party’s broadband policy is more than accessible on its Web site.

Australian Bureau of Statistics figures indicate there are only 701,600 unemployed people in Australia – so it appears a key Liberal Party policy is to create 1.3m additional jobs for Australians that don’t actually exist. Perhaps this is how the Coalition plans to finish the NBN on time.

Perhaps the Coalition doesn’t want to raise any unwelcome questions with voters in Robb’s safe seat, upon whom it is relying on a quick and easy re-election: investigations by voters would quickly reveal that much of his electorate isn’t scheduled to receive NBN services for at least the next three years.

One would think this would make the Liberals even more eager to promote their plan as delivering faster broadband outcomes. But as we all know, in Australian politics – especially when it comes to the NBN – logic doesn’t always rule supreme.

Perhaps the people preparing the brochure forgot to cc: the proofs to Turnbull, or simply forgot to consult the party’s own list of key priorities – which is doubly surprising since this brochure came from the chairman of the party’s policy development team.

Perhaps Robb really just hasn’t been paying attention to the ongoing furore around the NBN. Or, perhaps, it’s a suggestion to the Australian voting public that the NBN simply doesn’t matter anymore. “We don’t actually care about the NBN,” this brochure says, “so neither should you.”

If that’s the case, and this brochure actually reflects Coalition priorities, Turnbull is going to be spending a lot of time alphabetising his videotape collection if the Coalition is elected.
Edited by mel, 3 Sep 2013, 06:56 PM.
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


Seems like the coalition is quietly backing off from a few promises that will cause them trouble in the implementation because they reckon they will win anyhow and no need to make problems for them after they win.

I am still standing by my prediction that there will be a nice long review, followed by a continuation of the project largely as it currently is (at least from a technology perspective), but with a much more realistic (i.e. much longer) rollout schedule.

The project as it stands is hard to unpick, because the prime contractors all have multi-year contracts with ridiculous close-down penalties.
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
--Gloria Steinem
AREPS™
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mel
Member Avatar


miw
3 Sep 2013, 06:35 PM
The project as it stands is hard to unpick, because the prime contractors all have multi-year contracts with ridiculous close-down penalties.
wow all this time i hadn't considered the exit fees. Combine those with the replacement costs of deteriorating copper and whatever Tony's alternative might cost i suspect (and hope) you might be right miw. Maybe we have just gone too far with this to throw it all away.
Edited by mel, 3 Sep 2013, 06:44 PM.
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
themoops
Member Avatar
Ruby Member
miw
3 Sep 2013, 06:35 PM
I am still standing by my prediction that there will be a nice long review, followed by a continuation of the project largely as it currently is (at least from a technology perspective), but with a much more realistic (i.e. much longer) rollout schedule.

The project as it stands is hard to unpick, because the prime contractors all have multi-year contracts with ridiculous close-down penalties.
That's good news.

It makes sense that they are "against it" just to please the stupid old farts.

Then when they are "for it", they will have a better chance of getting second and third terms.

Any association with the left is political poison atm.
stinkbug omosessuale


Frank Castle is a liar and a criminal. He will often deliberately take people out of context and use straw man arguments.
Frank finally and unintentionally gives it up and admits he got where he is, primarily via dumb luck!
See here
Property will be 50-70% off by 2016.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy