Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
Doomers vs Cornucopians: The Oil Drum blog shuts down after 8 years - is this the end of Peak Oil?
Topic Started: 30 Aug 2013, 06:57 PM (2,361 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
What The Oil Drum Meant

Posted by Stuart Staniford on August 28, 2013 - 11:43pm

The popular peak oil blog The Oil Drum (TOD) began in early 2005. I joined as a contributor in mid 2005, later becoming an editor, and I left the site in early 2008. TOD continued in the meantime, at least up until now when the current editors have decided to transition to an archival format. They don't feel the quality and quantity of post submissions justify continuing. They asked a number of us old-timers to comment on the significance of TOD, and these are my reflections.

Posted Image

I start with the chart above. It shows, from 1950-2012, world oil production annually (red curve, left scale), and real oil prices annually (blue curve, right scale). I show in green boxes two regions of major disruption, and between them two regions of relatively calm behavior (in white).

The orderly region from 1950 to 1973 was characterized by very rapid growth in oil production that was achieved at very modest oil prices (around $20/barrel in 2011 dollars).

Then in 1973 came the Arab oil embargo, followed in 1979 by the Iranian revolution and then the Iraq-Iran war. These events caused a series of sharp but relatively short-lived contractions in the global oil supply. The result was huge price increases, and a permanent change in the way the world used oil.

After the dust settled in the mid eighties, oil production resumed growing fairly steadily, but never again at the frenetic pace of before the seventies - from now on society was more concerned with fuel efficiency and grew oil consumption more slowly. Prices fell into the $30 range, and remained there, give or take, for the next couple of decades. This was the second period of stability in the oil markets since WWII.

Then, in late 2004, global oil production largely stopped growing and entered a rough plateau. Prices began to shoot up, reaching well over $100/barrel within a few years, and largely staying there to this day (making allowance for a sharp downward fluctuation during the great recession).

There sprang up a large debate about the meaning of these events. The Oil Drum in particular I believe came to function as a central node in this debate, and one of the best places to hear a range of views that were based on a close analysis of the available data. The reason TOD is now coming to a close is that the need for this particular debate is over, at least for the time being. The data have spoken.

One extreme in this debate was what came to be known as cornucopians, epitomized by Daniel Yergin of the consultancy CERA. He made a long series of predictions that oil production would resume growing and prices would fall any day now. This was most famously satirized in a graph by Glenn Morton:

Posted Image

Obviously, this didn't happen. Oil production has not risen rapidly, and prices have not returned anywhere close to the pre-2004 idea of normal.

Another extreme in the debate were "doomers" who believed that global oil production would begin to fall very rapidly, very soon, because peak oil was upon us. "We're all gonna die" was the logical implication. One such forecaster was TOD contributor Ace who produced a series of forecasts like this one which showed oil production beginning a precipitous decline as of the date of the forecast:

Posted Image

The same piece forecast oil prices to rise rapidly and steadily and pass $200/barrel by the end of 2012. That didn't happen either.

I'm not sure anyone predicted the last eight years perfectly (including me). Still, on the whole, the various "moderates" in the debate came closest. What has actually occurred can best be seen in this graph which shows monthly oil production from a variety of data sources from 2002 onward:

Posted Image

The green curve is the EIA's estimate of the production of "crude and condensate" - C&C - which is a fairly narrow definition of oil that largely measures liquid hydrocarbons that flow out of the ground. The other curves show various estimates of "all liquids", which adds things like biofuels and "natural gas liquids" - compounds like propane and butane removed from natural gas production. These aren't really oil, but can substitute for it to varying degrees and so are often counted with it.

The crude-and-condensate curve is bumpy, but does slope upward slightly. The all liquids curve slopes up more, reflecting the fact that global natural gas production has increased steadily. High oil prices and government policies also induced a biofuel boom after 2005.

Thus we seem to live in a world in which, although traditional sources of oil are declining in many places, high oil prices (around $100-$120) are able to bring out enough low quality sources of hydrocarbon to offset this decline and just a bit more. Examples include oil fracced from very tight rocks in North Dakota, and tar sands production in Canada. These sources are difficult enough to bring on line that prices have not crashed, but are sufficient to prevent global oil production from actually declining. Clearly, we have not passed peak oil yet, and it's not at all clear when we will.

In the meantime, the situation has gotten quite dull. I compile graphs of oil production every month, and it's gotten somewhat akin to watching paint dry; every month, it's pretty much flat, and I tire of saying the same things over and over again.

On the other hand, we certainly don't live in the pre-2004 world any more. Oil prices are high, and there seems little prospect that they will ever fall below $100/barrel for any sustained period. If for no other reason, Saudi Arabia needs an oil price somewhere around there to balance its budget, and they are always in a position to force the price to stay above that threshold by modest decreases in their production.

Furthermore, the situation remains very vulnerable to disruption. Whereas in the eighties and nineties there was large amounts of spare capacity in oil production, nowadays there is little, and perhaps almost none. Any disruption in any sizeable oil producer will cause a large price spike - as we saw in 2011 when a revolution in Libya, which produced less than 2% of the world's oil, caused a sizeable price spike.

As I write, Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Iran are all subject to varying degrees of economic and political turmoil. We in the west are apparently about to bomb the Syrian government, as an interesting experiment to see what that does to the stability of the Middle East.

I assume at some point a large oil producer will descend into turmoil and then there will be a large price spike, and that may kick the global oil market out of the current meta-stable state. However, there is no telling when that might happen. In the mean time, oil production slowly creeps upward, and oil prices are around $100-$120.

One final point worth making: while global oil production has not peaked, oil consumption by the developed OECD countries almost certainly has. Since China, India, the Middle East, etc are all growing their consumption rapidly, and global supply is almost stagnant, OECD consumption must decline, and it has been:

Posted Image

I do not expect OECD consumption of oil to surpass its 2005 peak.

Read more: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/10213
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
goldbug
Default APF Avatar


I have read The oil drum. It was a scientific community whose purpose was to track and confirm the peaking of the globe's conventional oil production. Since that point has conclusively proven to have now passed (Convention oil peak) the forum no longer performs the function it was designed for. I think they were very wise to close it up. Too many forums go on longer than necessary IMO.


Quote:
 

we certainly don't live in the pre-2004 world any more. Oil prices are high, and there seems little prospect that they will ever fall below $100/barrel for any sustained period. If for no other reason, Saudi Arabia needs an oil price somewhere around there to balance its budget, and they are always in a position to force the price to stay above that threshold by modest decreases in their production.


It is no coincidence that house prices tanked across most of the OECD in the convention "cheap oil" peak window, nor that the GFC occured at the highest all time price for oil, around $150 a barrel. Nor that the world is choked in debt and can only escape collapse by adding more debt. O well, it wasn't going to last forever I suppose. Back to old ways, back to gold as a store of value.
Shadow was hopelessly wrong about the Gold Bull Market.
What else is he wrong about?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
nightowl
Unregistered

The future is unconventional deep offshore (Gulf oil spill) and onshore shale deposits with similar consequences.

Quote:
 

Company in oil train disaster files for bankruptcy protection
PUBLISHED: 08 Aug 2013

A rail company whose runaway oil train caused a fire and explosion that killed 47 people in a small town in Canada has filed for bankruptcy protection in the US and Canada.


Welcome to post-peak oil.
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Pig Iron
Member Avatar
Bogan scum

goldbug
30 Aug 2013, 07:56 PM
I have read The oil drum. It was a scientific community whose purpose was to track...
oh f*ck off it was....

bears should take note of what happened to the peak oilers...
I am the love child of Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
goldbug
Default APF Avatar


Everyone Missed It, But The EIA Just Totally Confirmed Peak Oil
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/everyone-missed-it-but-the-eia-just-totally-confirmed-peak-oil-2010-6

peak oil was confirmed on the ABC's Catalyst show on April 28, 2011
IEA head Fatih Birol confirmed that conventional crude oil production peaked in 2006.



Just keep that head of yours firmly planted in the sand pigiron and oil prices will be back to $20 a barrel in no time. :lol



Shadow was hopelessly wrong about the Gold Bull Market.
What else is he wrong about?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Pig Iron
Member Avatar
Bogan scum

goldbug
31 Aug 2013, 12:18 AM
Everyone Missed It, But The EIA Just Totally Confirmed Peak Oil
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/everyone-missed-it-but-the-eia-just-totally-confirmed-peak-oil-2010-6

peak oil was confirmed on the ABC's Catalyst show on April 28, 2011
IEA head Fatih Birol confirmed that conventional crude oil production peaked in 2006.



Just keep that head of yours firmly planted in the sand pigiron and oil prices will be back to $20 a barrel in no time. :lol



what ever, oil production has hit a 20 year high. peak oil debunked, even the die hards have figured it out you must be incredibly slow.
I am the love child of Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Bardon
Default APF Avatar



Peak Oil has died but there are a few peak splinter groups that will continue to bang the full drum.



Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mel
Member Avatar


Jim rogers is a well respected peak oil type of guy, who is also adamant that the world is running out of food (so he invests heavily in agriculture). I know this is off topic but i've noticed nominal food prices plummeting in the places where we have bought food from for years even though the AUD has fallen back a little. How can this be possible?
Edited by mel, 31 Aug 2013, 07:18 PM.
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
bob
Unregistered

Bardon
31 Aug 2013, 06:59 PM
Peak Oil has died but there are a few peak splinter groups that will continue to bang the full drum.



Don't confuse peak of conventional oil production with the ongoing slight increments from non conventional. The crossover date was 2005 and now we have oil that is over $100 and getting more expensive by the year. If you don't think this is a problem for a world where everything is made and moved by oil you really haven't thought it through.
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Guest
Unregistered

Citi On The Coming "Black" Gold-Rush

Quote:
 

The price of Brent is now up about 20% from the April 2013 levels (up 16% since June alone) and looks to be breaking out to the topside with the move above resistance in the $114 area


The present picture for the oil price looks increasingly bullish once more. Citi asks, is this a replay of the dynamics seen in the 1970’s? We hope not...

Following a surge in the Oil price over about 3 years from 2003 to 2006 (Post the Equity market collapse of 2000-2002 and the accompanying aggressive Fed easing) when Crude virtually tripled in price, we saw a correction into 2007 that fell just short of the 200 week moving average. This became a platform for the next move higher. This move was once again a virtual tripling in price but in half the time of the 2003-2006 move (18 months) between 2007-2008.

With a backdrop (In hindsight) that was weakening dramatically this was the “straw that broke the camel’s back” as the negative feedback loop moved through housing, the equity market, economic data and employment.

That resulted in a subsequent collapse in the Oil price into late 2008 before we saw a similar cycle start all over again.

Following a surge in the Oil price over about 3 years from late 2008 to early 2012 (Post the Equity market/housing/economic collapse and the accompanying aggressive Fed easing) when it more than tripled in price we saw a correction into 2012 that fell just short of the 200 week moving average. This became a platform for the next move higher that began in June of 2012.(We re-tested the 200 week moving average in April-July this year but have since rallied strongly again off that level)

The price of Brent is now up about 20% from the April 2013 levels (up 16% since June alone) and looks to be breaking out to the topside with the move above resistance in the $114 area. Interim resistance is met at $117.95-119.12 (Sept 2012 and Feb 2013 highs) and then $127-128.40 (Peaks in April 2011 and Feb 2012.)


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-08-30/citi-coming-black-gold-rush
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy