Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Housing Activity During Business Cycles - HIA Report; Examining the role and performance of residential construction during economic downturns and recoveries
Topic Started: 23 Aug 2013, 02:34 PM (507 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Housing Activity during Business Cycles - HIA Report (PDF)

The purpose of this note is to explore the relationship between housing activity and other economic indicators during previous business cycles. Starting with the early 1980s, we consider four distinct business cycle phases consisting of an upturn, downturn and recovery. The main findings are:

1. New home building tends to suffer disproportionately large declines during economic downturns. It can take many years for activity to recover to pre-downturn levels.

2. Activity in the renovations side of the market also tends to suffer during downturns, but the pace of recovery is quicker than for new home building.

3. During downturns, residential construction activity has shown itself to be very responsive to stimulatory policies like interest rate cuts and targeted fiscal measures towards the industry.

4. The reduction of the taxation burden as well as reform in the areas of regulation, planning and land supply would help strengthen new home building activity following a period of considerable under-performance which now extends for three years.

The early-1980s

Prior to the early 1980s business cycle hitting a peak, the level of activity across most indicators grew strongly. When the downturn kicked in, new dwelling commencements were badly hit. Commencements fell by around 35 per cent relative to their peak within two years of the start of the downturn. Alternations and Additions (A&As) to dwellings also fell off sharply, although not as severely as for new dwelling activity.

Non-residential construction fell sharply during the downturn, although not as steeply as new dwelling construction.

Once the bottom had been reached, detached house construction and non-residential construction both bounced back very strongly and had recovered to their pre-downturn peak within four years. The recovery of A&As was much more hesitant; activity was still below its pre-downturn level a full five years after the onset of the downturn.

Employment plays a crucial role in determining disposable income levels in an economy as well as generating household confidence. Accordingly, major commitments such as home purchases and renovations will be strongly affected by labour market developments. It is worth noting that during the early 1980s business cycle, housing activity started to recover only when employment was again on the increase and after it had returned to pre-downturn levels.

Figure 2 below provides a comparison between housing activity and mortgage interest rates during the early 1980s downturn. It is interesting to note that detached house commencements began their strong recovery at almost exactly the same time as mortgage interest rates began to fall. Renovations activity bottomed out at around the same time as the interest rate easing cycle began.

The early-1990s

Figure 3 below provides an overview of housing activity and other economic indicators during the early 1990s business cycle. Detached house commencements increased very strongly in advance of the peak in activity. When the downturn hit, activity eventually declined by over 30 per cent at its lowest ebb. Recovery was very slow, with activity still stuck below pre-downturn levels a full five years later.

In contrast, the rise of A&As activity was much more gentle prior to the downturn. Following the peak of activity, A&As fell by no more than 10 per cent and had recovered within two years of the downturn. This was a particularly incongruous outcome given how badly employment suffered during the downturn of the early 1990s; numbers employed fell by 3.5 per cent during the height of the downturn and the pace of recovery was extremely slow with employment taking over four years to return to its pre-downturn level. Non-residential construction also saw a very sharp decline during the downturn followed by a very slow recovery.

During the early 1990s cycle, it is interesting to see how mortgage interest rates interacted with housing activity. Interest rates rose in the run up to the start of the economic downturn. Once the downturn commenced, mortgage interest rates embarked on a significant downward journey, illustrated in Figure 4 below. The A&As segment of the market responded quite strongly to the lower interest rates being in place.

Detached house commencements also responded well to lower interest rates, although the recovery fell far short of pre-downturn levels. The weakness in new home building may be partly explained by the behaviour of real house prices which surged in the lead up to the peak, but then declined by up to 10 per cent before stagnating.

The GST Business Cycle

Tthe introduction of the Goods & Services Tax (GST) in July 2000 resulted in a large amount of spending being dragged forward to the first half of 2000 and a sharp fall off in activity post July 2000. This is illustrated in Figure 5 below. The associated effects on economic activity were substantial: detached house commencements fell by almost 50 per cent in the immediate aftermath of the GST’s introduction, with a similarly sharp decline in non-residential construction. Motor vehicle sales also suffered to a lesser degree, while the reduction in A&As activity was also more muted.

A&As had returned to pre-downturn levels within three years, but new home building was still significantly lower five years after the start of the downturn. Indeed, detached house commencements have never fully recovered to pre-GST levels at any stage over the subsequent thirteen years. Interestingly, the GST downturn did not involve any significant decline in employment. Rather, activity in the labour market stagnated for a few quarters before resuming a growth trajectory.

The GST business cycle was also marked by strong housing price activity before and after the beginning of the downturn. This is illustrated in Figure 6 below. Real house prices declined very slightly before the economic downturn but quickly resumed a very strong growth path.

The GFC Business Cycle

Figure 7 below shows the development of several key indicators for Australia during the GFC cycle. In the run up to the GFC, detached house commencements had largely been static. The beginning of the GFC downturn saw activity fall sharply but a strong recovery in detached house building was prompted by the government’s stimulus programme and record reductions in interest rates. However, the withdrawal of the stimulus and interest rate increases saw a second dip in detached house building. Similarly, A&As as well as motor vehicle sales saw smaller but significant reductions in activity, especially A&As.

Non-residential construction activity initially weakened during the onset of the GFC but subsequently recorded huge growth as the mining and natural resources (MNR) investment boom gathered pace. Non-residential construction activity in this area was also strengthened by large-scale investment in the education sector and in health infrastructure.

Interest rate and house price developments during the GFC business cycle are shown in Figure 8 below. It is worth noting that both detached house commencements and renovations activity recovered strongly from their initial falls and the era of low mortgage interest rates is likely to have played some role in this, in addition to some of the factors mentioned above. The close relationship between renovations activity and real house prices post-GFC is also worth noting. Declines in prices dampened the accumulation of home equity, therebyrestricting the scope for renovations financing.

Conclusion

The four business cycles examined here included phases of growth, contraction and recovery. Several common features are discernible: first, residential construction activity tends to take a disproportionately large hit during economic downturns, particularly new home building. Second, Alterations & Additions work tends to recover more quickly than detached house construction and the magnitude of its recovery appears dependent on house price growth. Third, new home building activity tends to take a very long time to recover once it experiences cyclical decline.

These observations underline the vulnerability of the home building sector during periods of economic weakness and demonstrate that strong policy support for the sector during cyclical downturns is warranted. The experience of the GFC shows that stimulatory policies in the sector are capable of lifting activity – but also that abrupt withdrawal of such measures has the potential to tip activity back into decline.

In addition to the weak economic environment, there are a range of structural factors currently obstructing a sizeable and sustainable recovery in residential construction, related to land supply, taxation, planning, regulation, and a squeeze on credit. A focus on reform measures to lift residential construction activity is a crucial area for policy development across all levels of government, and obviously needs to be led at a Federal level.

Read more: http://economics.hia.com.au/media/Business%20Cycles%20Paper.pdf
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Construction at strongest in years, but still declining

By Jennifer Duke
Monday, 07 October 2013

A return to growth in the house building and apartment building sub-sectors have boosted national construction to the point where it’s recording its strongest reading in three and a half years in September, according to the Australian Performance of Construction Index.

While this positive result was seen, with a 3.9 point lift, the index record stayed just under the 50 “break even” point at 47.6.

Growth in new orders was listed as the reason for expansion in activity for the first time since April 2010.

Australian Industry Group chief economist, Julie Toth, said that the construction sector is now closer to stabilisation more so than at any time up until 2010.

“The housing and apartment sectors are driving the industry’s improved performance on the back of lower interest rates and a lift in buyer sentiment. Meanwhile, declines in both commercial and engineering construction moderated in the month,” said Toth.

“Despite these encouraging trends, it is clear that the industry continues to face a tough operating environment with impediments such as tight credit conditions and a lack of public sector building activity continuing to weigh on overall activity. Nevertheless, with new orders increasing for the first time since May 2010, there are grounds for cautious optimism that the current improving trend can be sustained in coming months,” she said.

Propell National Valuers economist, Linda Phillips, said that it's worthwhile remembering that there's still strictly a decline - it's just a slower decline than has been seen in recent times.

"What is actually happening is that the construction sector continued to decline in September, but is declining at its slowest pace in 3 1/2 years and is expected to level off in the coming months, pointing to a possible expansion in the new year," said Phillips.

"A reading of 50 is a breakeven point, indicating that activity is neither increasing nor declining. The index has climbed to 47.6 in September, which means that construction activity is still declining, but by not as much as previously. However, with improvements in housing construction demand, it is likely that the index will move towards breakeven in coming months," she said.

Read more: http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/national-construction-strongest-in-35-years/2013100665527
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy