Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
Are Central Banks Losing Credibility with Markets?
Topic Started: 21 Aug 2013, 12:50 PM (1,448 Views)
Catweasel
Member Avatar


b_b
2 Sep 2013, 05:26 PM
Never said that.
Chin scratch say "As for QE has an impact on market prices - well I think that is nonsense".

Maybe it true or maybe it not.

But it cannot prove simply on a belief system.

In the reality,

it have no the proof for what it believe and it cannot QE disprove not that influence a asset the price.

That the problem with majority of the beigists.

Its belief systems become so the strong.

All the notion of empirical the test,

go out a back door.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Strindberg
Member Avatar


Gazo
2 Sep 2013, 04:27 PM
Australian T-bond market, - where 10-year T-bond yields have been trending higher for the past 13-months, even while the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) was engaged in a rate cutting campaign.
Despite the 10 year bond yield rising over the last year, the yield is still below what it was in April last year and far below what it was for the whole of the more than 40 years before then.

The 10 year rate is not simply about the current cash rate. Rising market long term rates are reflective of the markets expectations of the future.

Quote:
 
I'll say it again, interest rates will rise sooner than the market expects.

Good luck with knowing better than the market.
Quote:
 
The RBA is using it's last bit of ammo to stimulate the economy and at the same time is leading the property sheep to slaughter.

I can understand a doom prediction which asserts a crash despite low interest rates.

But I fail to understand a doom prediction based on coming high interest rates which will only ever be imposed in a healthy economy.

You seem to be suggesting that the RBA will not be able to keep low interest rates. The RBA is entirely in control of Australian interest rates. Market interest rates may rise based on the market's expectations of future RBA action.
Housing costs to Income broadly unchanged since 1994 - re-ratified here
The People of Australia have the highest median wealth in the World
2002-2012 10 year house price growth the SLOWEST since 1952-1962
"There are two kinds of people in this world: ones that fiddle around wondering whether a thing's right or wrong and guys like us." (Hugo to Gagin in Ride the Pink Horse)
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
b_b
Default APF Avatar


Gazo
2 Sep 2013, 05:34 PM
yes - no need for low blows

else i'll ask you a silly question too - do you know how to build up a cap rate for a comemrcial property?

my guess is that you need to dig a little deeper to discover the true impact QE has on asset prices.
Tell me how you think adding to the reserves of the banking system increases company profits?
Catweasel
2 Sep 2013, 05:49 PM
b_b
2 Sep 2013, 05:26 PM
Never said that.
Chin scratch say "As for QE has an impact on market prices - well I think that is nonsense".

Maybe it true or maybe it not.

But it cannot prove simply on a belief system.

In the reality,

it have no the proof for what it believe and it cannot QE disprove not that influence a asset the price.

That the problem with majority of the beigists.

Its belief systems become so the strong.

All the notion of empirical the test,

go out a back door.
You Said
Quote:
 
Chin scratch believes it can predict an equity market with or without a QE.

I never said that. It was false.
Edited by b_b, 2 Sep 2013, 06:08 PM.
(S – I) + (T - G) + (M - X) = 0
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mel
Member Avatar


Strindberg
2 Sep 2013, 05:49 PM
You seem to be suggesting that the RBA will not be able to keep low interest rates. The RBA is entirely in control of Australian interest rates. Market interest rates may rise based on the market's expectations of future RBA action.
I believed this was the case also. Can we confirm 100% without doubt that they are not required by any legislation to raise or lower the cash rate at any time? Of course (and importantly) there could be dire consequences with poor policy but the RBA still have total and absolute control of the cash rate, right?

thanks
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
b_b
Default APF Avatar


mel
2 Sep 2013, 06:21 PM
Strindberg
2 Sep 2013, 05:49 PM
You seem to be suggesting that the RBA will not be able to keep low interest rates. The RBA is entirely in control of Australian interest rates. Market interest rates may rise based on the market's expectations of future RBA action.
I believed this was the case also. Can we confirm 100% without doubt that they are not required by any legislation to raise or lower the cash rate at any time? Of course (and importantly) there could be dire consequences with poor policy but the RBA still have total and absolute control of the cash rate, right?

thanks
The RBA is in total control of the short end (inside money) interest rate so long as it is in AUD. Every bond eventually prices off the final short end rate (as they reach maturity). So in effect, the RBA indirectly impacts the price of long term money too.
Edited by b_b, 2 Sep 2013, 06:34 PM.
(S – I) + (T - G) + (M - X) = 0
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Gazo
Default APF Avatar


b_b
2 Sep 2013, 05:53 PM
Tell me how you think adding to the reserves of the banking system increases company profits?

You Said


I never said that. It was false.
It's a rather logical explanation when one has TBTF corporations generating 'investment' profits off the back of a buyer 'of last resort' who is lending at artificially cheap rates.
For what's it's worth, Nanex and Zerohedge are probably the closest to showing the correlation.
QE is not only a process of 'adding to the reserves of the banking system'.

Cap rates have everything to do with long bond rates. This is Property Finance 101.



Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mel
Member Avatar


b_b
2 Sep 2013, 06:33 PM
The RBA is in total control of the short end (inside money) interest rate so long as it is in AUD. Every bond eventually prices off the final short end rate (as they reach maturity). So in effect, the RBA indirectly impacts the price of long term money too.
thaks for that b_b
APF - a place where serious people don't take themselves too seriously. There's nothing else like it.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
b_b
Default APF Avatar


Gazo
2 Sep 2013, 06:47 PM
It's a rather logical explanation when one has TBTF corporations generating 'investment' profits off the back of a buyer 'of last resort' who is lending at artificially cheap rates.
For what's it's worth, Nanex and Zerohedge are probably the closest to showing the correlation.
QE is not only a process of 'adding to the reserves of the banking system'.

Cap rates have everything to do with long bond rates. This is Property Finance 101.


Firstly, I think you mean long bond rates impact cap rates (back to 101 class for you?). Even so, you would still be wrong (real long bonds are far more important).

Secondly, qe adds to bank reserves. And banks can not lend out reserves. So you seem very confused, perhaps because you are getting your education from "zeroclue". The same mob who predicted the us would be broke by 2012, and hyperinflation was inevitable.
b_b
2 Sep 2013, 07:00 PM
Firstly, I think you mean long bond rates impact cap rates (back to 101 class for you?). Even so, you would still be wrong (real long bonds are far more important).

Secondly, qe adds to bank reserves. And banks can not lend out reserves. So you seem very confused, perhaps because you are getting your education from "zeroclue". The same mob who predicted the us would be broke by 2012, and hyperinflation was inevitable.
As I said, asset prices are up because profits are up. Swelling bank reserves does not help corporate profits. In fact, it hurts them.
Edited by b_b, 2 Sep 2013, 07:03 PM.
(S – I) + (T - G) + (M - X) = 0
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
genX
Default APF Avatar


b_b
2 Sep 2013, 07:00 PM
Secondly, qe adds to bank reserves.
QE I and II were asset swaps of credit securities for cash. Reserves did not increase.
Quote:
 
And banks can not lend out reserves.
Banks can and have repo'd cash for equity on very short durations.
Quote:
 
As I said, asset prices are up because profits are up.
Asset prices have risen faster than profits, so either you are incorrect, or the next 10-20 years of future profits are already priced into asset prices, and hence they will stop rising. Corporate profits are up because personal income is declining, and has been since 2008.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Gazo
Default APF Avatar


b_b
2 Sep 2013, 07:00 PM
Firstly, I think you mean long bond rates impact cap rates (back to 101 class for you?). Even so, you would still be wrong (real long bonds are far more important).

Secondly, qe adds to bank reserves. And banks can not lend out reserves. So you seem very confused, perhaps because you are getting your education from "zeroclue". The same mob who predicted the us would be broke by 2012, and hyperinflation was inevitable.

As I said, asset prices are up because profits are up. Swelling bank reserves does not help corporate profits. In fact, it hurts them.
Are you a banker? That would explain a few things.

Did I say short term bond rates? Don't think so - read again. No need to lecture someone with a degree in property.

Whether you can lend the reserves or not, doesn't deter TBTF banks to speculate MORE on asset prices.

Not sure why all the fuss about tapering then - it's all because of profits, you say.

Care to show us when zerohedge predicted that - send link please.

You just carry on reading your sources, I'll stay to mine. The more ignorant people like you keep bidding asset prices up with no real fundamentals the better the show for us willing to dig a little deeper.

And with that, let me introduce you one of the feds feds plunge protection team members: http://www.zerohedge.com/search/apachesolr_search/

Is that a direct enough link for you :tu: ... Shift+R improves the quality of this image. CTRL+F5 reloads the whole page.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy