Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
Stamp duty hobbling housing mobility
Topic Started: 4 Aug 2013, 12:54 PM (2,214 Views)
Foxy
Member Avatar
Zero is coming...

i think stamp duty is good.
peter
http://www.afr.com/content/dam/images/g/n/2/1/u/8/image.imgtype.afrArticleInline.620x0.png/1456285515560.png
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
It’s time to index stamp duty

Peter Chittenden, 1 September 2014

A strong resurgence in the residential property market has significantly lifted transfer duties; including residential stamp duty in 2013-14 and signs are the trend will continue.

However for what has been described by some commentators, as a ‘windfall’ may in reality be a clear sign that long overdue stamp duty reforms should be addressed now while the market is so positive.

Higher prices and continued strong demand are putting a lid on affordability, along with low interest rates and while very competitive interest rates are welcome, it’s time to look at a longer term solution to the government’s heavy reliance on stamp duty revenue. The state government’s first time buyer concessions are also only available on new homes and so this tends to fuel demand in some, mainly outer, areas but the concessions also limit the choices of first time buyers.

However the much wider consideration is that government revenue may be far too reliant on stamp duty revenue from a robust property market. We should question if this is placing a greater or uneven burden on home buyers for a revenue benefit for the government that may be short lived. At the same time government is naturally welcoming the revenue, but this is a volatile source of cash.

And while state-based tax reforms looks a long way off, I think that it is reasonable to suggest that while the market is so strong that this is the ideal time to start the process of reform. Because in the longer term, lower stamp duties with more widespread affordability might well help to fuel and sustain a more robust market. This process could start with indexation.

However before looking at the case in favour of indexation, one of the most telling figures in this debate is the comparison between GST revenue and transfer duty that NSW receives. GST revenue in 2014-15 is estimated at $6.094 billion rising to $6.9 billion in 2017-18. By comparison, the total transfer duty revenue in 2014-15 is estimated at $6.095 billion (of which $4.7 billion flows from residential property stamp duty) but this is anticipated to rise to $7.256 billion in 2017-18. On top of which we should not forget that revenue from land tax will add $2.4 billion – $2.8 billion in the same time frame, plus the parking space levy is set to reach $115 million by 2017-18. Adding these figures we see that by 2017-18 property related revenue for the state will be some $10.24 billion. To me this appears to suggest a possible imbalance.

Higher Prices Should not be Driving Revenue

We currently have historically low interest rates, pent up demand, undersupply, improved consumer confidence and of course the obvious big increase in house prices. It is the rapid increase in prices YTD to 16.3% against an anticipated 7% increase that really does support the argument. It is time for the NSW government to look at reducing or at least moderating the amount of stamp duty from residential buyers via some form of indexation.

The concern being expressed is that stamp duty does play a role in the housing affordability debate. The figures speak for themselves, when you consider that the average stamp duty paid by a property buyer is now $23,805 and that only nine years ago it was $14,485, then the figures look horrible. In 2005/06 total stamp duty paid was $2.3 billion today its $4.7 billion.

The result comes about because higher property prices are pushing average home buyers into more expensive stamp duty brackets. Economists refer to this phenomenon as bracket creep. Governments tend to enjoy bracket creep because it delivers growing tax receipts without nasty policy changes or political debates.

The current stamp duty brackets have not been changed for a very long time (except for the “premium property” bracket that was introduced in 2004). When these brackets were put in place, the median house price in NSW was less than $300,000. The median house price in Sydney is now $783,000 as bracket creep catches more and more buyers. Already we know that in some 170 Sydney suburbs, that’s one in five, median prices are now $1 million plus, and this is a further signal that some adjustments are warranted.

Governments do need revenue, but stamp duty reform has been promised for many years, and the current policy is a negative for many buyers. It’s also a source of income that in many ways is frequently volatile. One solution is to start and adjust the growing bracket creep problem, and this could be done in stages.

If some changes are made now when receipts are high then the NSW government can start indexing the benchmark to be more in-line with today’s values, as current rates are distorted and need adjustment.

After all, in Sydney almost no homes are well below or even near $300,000, which was the median price when current rates were set.

Read more: http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/financing/tax-and-legal/35155-it-s-time-to-index-stamp-duty-peter-chittenden.html
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy