Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 7
Plan to revive residential construction failing; Hopes of a soft landing post mining boom fading fast.
Topic Started: 7 May 2013, 12:15 PM (6,699 Views)
Pig Iron
Member Avatar
Bogan scum

Perthite
30 Aug 2013, 04:10 PM
Prices are not going to crash.

If the fall in capex does not result in significant job losses the prices are unlikely to fall. Especially with rates at these levels.
let me guess, your plan is to claim you were right by later trying to split hairs between what "price fall" and "crash really means?

http://australianpropertyforum.com/single/?p=8423594&t=9876575

on the one hand you are claiming prices will fall because falling capex will result in job losses, when asked directly your response is "no shit i do". but now you've wriggled around to saying this might not happen.

nice try my slippery little eel.
Edited by Pig Iron, 30 Aug 2013, 04:29 PM.
I am the love child of Tony Abbott and Pauline Hanson
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
b_b
Default APF Avatar


To be clear - I expect much weaker GDP growth relative to today and rising unemployment and higher house prices....

I think many people confuse the link between GDP growth with assets prices.

If I said in 2009 that over the next four years
- US GDP growth would average less than 2%,
- that unemployment was going to stay above 7.5%, and
- US equity prices would increase by 100%,

a lot of people would have said I was crazy....
(S – I) + (T - G) + (M - X) = 0
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Perthite
Member Avatar


Pig Iron
30 Aug 2013, 04:28 PM
let me guess, your plan is to claim you were right by later trying to split hairs between what "price fall" and "crash really means?

http://australianpropertyforum.com/single/?p=8423594&t=9876575

on the one hand you are claiming prices will fall because falling capex will result in job losses, when asked directly your response is "no shit i do". but now you've wriggled around to saying this might not happen.

nice try my slippery little eel.
It can always go either way.

However I firmly believe job losses from the end of the mining investment boom will directly impact population growth and residential construction.

Growth will have to be found elsewhere.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Lef-tee
Default APF Avatar


Quote:
 
i'm book marking this for future reference when lower capex fails to produce the housing crash you all expect.


Yes, that's along the lines of what I said.

The cohort who are driving the price rises at present are generally less vulnerable to unemployment than those in the first time buyer cohort.

What we seem likely to have if nothing changes is a poorly performing economy, dragged down by unemployment and underemployment. Meanwhile sitting on top of the pile, a rentier class who are busily squashing the opportunities of the next generation, while using generous tax breaks to endlessly enrich themselves to the detriment of others - pretty much the epitome of Black Panther's glorious vision.

It's not the kind of country I aspire to live in but with concepts like the common good now pretty much consigned to history, it seems easily possible.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
peter fraser
Member Avatar


Lef-tee
31 Aug 2013, 08:15 AM


Yes, that's along the lines of what I said.

The cohort who are driving the price rises at present are generally less vulnerable to unemployment than those in the first time buyer cohort.

What we seem likely to have if nothing changes is a poorly performing economy, dragged down by unemployment and underemployment. Meanwhile sitting on top of the pile, a rentier class who are busily squashing the opportunities of the next generation, while using generous tax breaks to endlessly enrich themselves to the detriment of others - pretty much the epitome of Black Panther's glorious vision.

It's not the kind of country I aspire to live in but with concepts like the common good now pretty much consigned to history, it seems easily possible.
Lef tee governments used to pursue policies and taxes that redistributed wealth, trying to stop massive wealth accumulating in the hands of just a few. I believe we are seeing the end result of decades of policy change that has actively encouraged a new class system. In the USA it's quite clear just who has the wealth and who doesn't. Those policies have travelled throughout the western nations including our own.

I'm not being a raging commie here, I'm simply acknowledging what I see. I'm not surprised that we now have a wealthy class who will emulate the older upper class in Europe and assume ownership of the majority of assets, whilst the workers will just have to squabble over the crumbs.

I expect to see a diminishing proportion of home ownership as the wealthier families simply buy up the assets that the rest don't want to buy. This is what Coles and Woolies has been doing to the retail grocery market for years. The price paid for assets almost doesn't matter if there is a limited supply, further supply is controlled, and the owners of the supply are wealthy and don't need to sell - and best of all the asset is needed by everybody.

I'm not seeing any conspiracies, just the gradual shift over decades via policy change and tax change. I don't look at these issues emotionally because I need to work out what is best for me and my family, and I can't change the world around me, I can only change the way I fit in with it.

But it beats the hell out of me why people don't understand this. Buffet sure does and he has commented many times about it. It's not a secret, yet no-one seems to understand.

From my perspective I think that house prices will go up globally as less and less people own an ever increasing share of them, and those who do own them will be wealthy enough to cover any downturn - they won't have to sell as in the past.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
goldbug
Default APF Avatar


peter fraser
31 Aug 2013, 09:13 AM
The price paid for assets almost doesn't matter if there is a limited supply, further supply is controlled, and the owners of the supply are wealthy and don't need to sell - and best of all the asset is needed by everybody.

I'm not seeing any conspiracies, just the gradual shift over decades via policy change and tax change. I don't look at these issues emotionally because I need to work out what is best for me and my family, and I can't change the world around me, I can only change the way I fit in with it.
But what are proposing is dependent on massive ongoing debt, and especially on low interest rates. Woolworths and Coles buy out of cashflow, it's basically a way of avoiding tax as much as a plan to enlarge their business. Property investors buy on leverage and you only have the last 10 or so years of low interest rates and lax banking policy to base your theory on. If there is a banking crisis, or rates rise precipitously your whole thesis is shot out of the water.
Shadow was hopelessly wrong about the Gold Bull Market.
What else is he wrong about?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
John Frum
Member Avatar


peter fraser
31 Aug 2013, 09:13 AM
Lef tee governments used to pursue policies and taxes that redistributed wealth, trying to stop massive wealth accumulating in the hands of just a few. I believe we are seeing the end result of decades of policy change that has actively encouraged a new class system. In the USA it's quite clear just who has the wealth and who doesn't. Those policies have travelled throughout the western nations including our own.

I'm not being a raging commie here, I'm simply acknowledging what I see. I'm not surprised that we now have a wealthy class who will emulate the older upper class in Europe and assume ownership of the majority of assets, whilst the workers will just have to squabble over the crumbs.

I expect to see a diminishing proportion of home ownership as the wealthier families simply buy up the assets that the rest don't want to buy. This is what Coles and Woolies has been doing to the retail grocery market for years. The price paid for assets almost doesn't matter if there is a limited supply, further supply is controlled, and the owners of the supply are wealthy and don't need to sell - and best of all the asset is needed by everybody.

I'm not seeing any conspiracies, just the gradual shift over decades via policy change and tax change. I don't look at these issues emotionally because I need to work out what is best for me and my family, and I can't change the world around me, I can only change the way I fit in with it.

But it beats the hell out of me why people don't understand this. Buffet sure does and he has commented many times about it. It's not a secret, yet no-one seems to understand.

From my perspective I think that house prices will go up globally as less and less people own an ever increasing share of them, and those who do own them will be wealthy enough to cover any downturn - they won't have to sell as in the past.
This seems a pretty fair analysis of the current situation. it's a recurrent pattern, from what I've read about Western history at least, that gradually wealth is transferred to a smaller elite class. I don't think this is part of some grand conspiracy either, it's just an individual's self-interested behaviour (which is how you described your personal situation Peter) writ large.

However there have always been stages where the underclass are oppressed so cruelly that they band together and threaten insurrection - from English history I'm thinking of the Peasants’ Revolt, or movements like the Levellers and Chartists - and the property owning classes will be forced to capitulate and offer some concessions: voting rights, better health care, abolishing slavery etc., so in this way some wealth is redistributed back and people's lives slowly improve. Most are smart enough to know that even if they're priced out of the housing market they have a far superior quality of life than the generations before, and it's largely thanks to these events that this is the case.

I guess the question now is how far away is the next flash point in the West. HSBC UK's chief economist (way more interesting than the brain-dead muppet they've got over here) seems to think it's pretty close:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10170101/Europes-rich-could-face-uprising-similar-to-Peasants-Revolt.html

Me personally I reckon we would have to see a much bigger reduction in people's quality of life to trigger a revolt. Perhaps food shortages or a failing health system. And this could take years to play out. (note to Mr Pig Shit - that was not a prediction on house price falls)
"It were not best that we should all think alike; it is difference of opinion that makes horse races." - Mark Twain on why he avoids discussing house prices over at MacroBusiness.
"Buy land, they're not making any more of it." - Georgist Land Tax proponent Mark Twain laughing in his grave at humourless idiots like skamy that continually use this quip to justify housing bubbles.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
peter fraser
Member Avatar


Soul Torpor
31 Aug 2013, 09:54 AM
This seems a pretty fair analysis of the current situation. it's a recurrent pattern, from what I've read about Western history at least, that gradually wealth is transferred to a smaller elite class. I don't think this is part of some grand conspiracy either, it's just an individual's self-interested behaviour (which is how you described your personal situation Peter) writ large.

However there have always been stages where the underclass are oppressed so cruelly that they band together and threaten insurrection - from English history I'm thinking of the Peasants’ Revolt, or movements like the Levellers and Chartists - and the property owning classes will be forced to capitulate and offer some concessions: voting rights, better health care, abolishing slavery etc., so in this way some wealth is redistributed back and people's lives slowly improve. Most are smart enough to know that even if they're priced out of the housing market they have a far superior quality of life than the generations before, and it's largely thanks to these events that this is the case.

I guess the question now is how far away is the next flash point in the West. HSBC UK's chief economist (way more interesting than the brain-dead muppet they've got over here) seems to think it's pretty close:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/10170101/Europes-rich-could-face-uprising-similar-to-Peasants-Revolt.html

Me personally I reckon we would have to see a much bigger reduction in people's quality of life to trigger a revolt. Perhaps food shortages or a failing health system. And this could take years to play out. (note to Mr Pig Shit - that was not a prediction on house price falls)
You pretty much have it. Clearly the flash point is pretty damn close for Egypt (unemployment over 13%) but a long way off here, if ever.

In decades gone by there were marginal tax rates for the wealthy of over 70% and death duties paid when someone with assets died. I'm totally against that level of taxation, but perhaps the pendulum has swung too far.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 7



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy