Quantcast
Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Residex Accurate Property Data

Welcome to the Australian Property Forum. Please register here or log in below.

Username:   Password:
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
Louis Christopher SQM cocks up his attack on RP Data
Topic Started: 4 Jul 2012, 10:14 AM (2,839 Views)
TheRazorsEdge
No Avatar


Aussiehouseprices
5 Jul 2012, 03:53 PM
Where did you think it was grown??
Macquarie St. Sydney.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
earthsta
No Avatar


Aussiehouseprices
5 Jul 2012, 01:52 PM
miw
4 Jul 2012, 08:33 PM
Is this what you were looking for under "independent variables"? (They call these the "hedonic variables" in the methodology paper.

Suburb
Land size (m2) if property type = house
Street classification (highway, main road, cul de sac etc.)
Property type (eg. free standing house, semi etc. for houses)
Number of bedrooms
Number of bathrooms
Number of car spaces
Pool (Y/N)
Waterfront (Y/N)
Air Conditioning (Y/N)
View (Y/N)
If you have a view of a sewage farm, would you get a "Y" or "N"?
Ask Frank. His PPOR overlooks Luggage Point :lol
Online View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
TheRazorsEdge
No Avatar


earthsta
5 Jul 2012, 06:00 PM
Ask Frank. His PPOR overlooks Luggage Point :lol
Frank lives on Nudgee Golf Course??? No wonder he is so relaxed.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


Aussiehouseprices
5 Jul 2012, 01:46 PM
What about age of house / how recently renovated?
Say I buy an old place, renovate every room and sell for a higher price, because none of the variables listed have changed, it will help to boost the index.
I would have thought that the point of a hedonic index is that it shouldn't.
There are bunch of things that I would have thought were important that aren't in there. Proximity to public transport has already been mentioned.

Some of them are no doubt not there because the data just has not been collected for a big enough percentage of the stock - age of building and current state of renovation would come into that category I guess, but proximity to transport woud be easily calculable and is quite significant.

Whether it has any huge impact on the index I wouldn't know.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Perthite
Member Avatar


With regards to the accuracy of RPData. What's with the voilent fluctuations in Perth?

http://www.rpdata.com/research/back_series.html
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


Perthite
5 Jul 2012, 08:30 PM
With regards to the accuracy of RPData. What's with the voilent fluctuations in Perth?

http://www.rpdata.com/research/back_series.html
The whole index seems somewhat borked across the change in financial years, actually. I've been watching Brisbane and either armageddon is here, or there is severe short-term bogosity in evidence.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
TheRazorsEdge
No Avatar


miw
5 Jul 2012, 09:08 PM
The whole index seems somewhat borked across the change in financial years, actually. I've been watching Brisbane and either armageddon is here, or there is severe short-term bogosity in evidence.
If one could determine the weakness in the methodology, it could provide arbitrage. I think the independent variables list is probably not resilient enough to measure exogenous effects such as stamp duty extensions/FHOG, sudden changes to local employment (such as mass layoffs), floods, bushfires, zoning corruption scandals in local government.

Still, betting against a Goldmanite is more dangerous than dancing with the devil, so best just give it a wide berth.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
kennyjaiz
No Avatar


miw
5 Jul 2012, 07:55 PM
There are bunch of things that I would have thought were important that aren't in there. Proximity to public transport has already been mentioned.

Some of them are no doubt not there because the data just has not been collected for a big enough percentage of the stock - age of building and current state of renovation would come into that category I guess, but proximity to transport woud be easily calculable and is quite significant.

Whether it has any huge impact on the index I wouldn't know.
I think the index attempts to cater for proximity to public transport by "weighted region", with region focused and targeted enough to detect the difference in value resulting from proximity to amenities and transport. How sensitive this weighted region is, I'm not sure.

But age of building, recency of renovation and quality of renovation are not captured, as you mentioned.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


TheRazorsEdge
5 Jul 2012, 09:25 PM
If one could determine the weakness in the methodology, it could provide arbitrage. I think the independent variables list is probably not resilient enough to measure exogenous effects such as stamp duty extensions/FHOG, sudden changes to local employment (such as mass layoffs), floods, bushfires, zoning corruption scandals in local government.

Still, betting against a Goldmanite is more dangerous than dancing with the devil, so best just give it a wide berth.
Yes. I think I mentioned this before as well. Even excluding manipulation (which I think is highly unlikely - it would kill the goose as dead as a stone eventually) and poor methodology (I think the methodology is pretty robust given the basic intractibility of the problem) There are a bunch of issues that may make the index an unsuitable underlier for derivatives.

What I *think* we are seeing here in Brisbane is the effect of the stamp duty change. Over the last half of June there would have been a reduction in new contracts as people wait for the new regime, but old data from May, April and even March would still be coming in at the normal rate, thus changing the temporal composition of incoming data and causing a predictable anomaly. If I am right, we should see the index snap back to levels around that of June 25th quite quickly, maybe even overshoot as the deals that were closed at the end of June finally get reported and into the data. If I am wrong, then the much-hailed crash may have hit Brisbane in the last week.

Similarly for natural disasters, etc etc. as you point out. The index is a lagging indicator that takes a while to reflect information that we already know. Most if not all derivative underliers reflect all known information almost instantly, minimising arbitrage opportunities.

This is not to say it can't be used and that what we'll see is futures and options prices (options will effectively use the futures contract as the underlier, not the index) will not adjust and move away from the index when the market knows the index has some catching up to do, but there is a long way to go before the index can earn its stripes. Perhaps 10 years.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


kennyjaiz
5 Jul 2012, 10:06 PM
I think the index attempts to cater for proximity to public transport by "weighted region", with region focused and targeted enough to detect the difference in value resulting from proximity to amenities and transport. How sensitive this weighted region is, I'm not sure.

But age of building, recency of renovation and quality of renovation are not captured, as you mentioned.
I agree. They probably can get some notion of location desirability in there.

Another thing that is glaringly missing is inside floor area.

Makes me think that their major/only source of data is real estate listings. In Australia, the floor area and the date of build/renovation are not often found in listings. If the floor area is listed it is very often a lie.

Finding out the age of a building is not a trivial exercise, at least in Brisbane - which is surprising because it is such an important detail. You find yourself narrowing down on it by looking at the dates of documents that have to have been dated before start of construction and others that can't be done until after completion, but you usually end up with 4-6-month windows for building start and building completion. You are often reduced to opening up the electrical switchboard which usually has an installation date in it and you know that would have gone in reasonably shortly before completion.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
kennyjaiz
No Avatar


miw
5 Jul 2012, 10:27 PM
I agree. They probably can get some notion of location desirability in there.

Another thing that is glaringly missing is inside floor area.

Makes me think that their major/only source of data is real estate listings. In Australia, the floor area and the date of build/renovation are not often found in listings. If the floor area is listed it is very often a lie.

Finding out the age of a building is not a trivial exercise, at least in Brisbane - which is surprising because it is such an important detail. You find yourself narrowing down on it by looking at the dates of documents that have to have been dated before start of construction and others that can't be done until after completion, but you usually end up with 4-6-month windows for building start and building completion. You are often reduced to opening up the electrical switchboard which usually has an installation date in it and you know that would have gone in reasonably shortly before completion.
You may be right. But the information presented on a real estate listing is not systematic (i.e. random missing information) and full of error. Hopefully they at least validate the data integrity with secondary or historical sources (e.g. local council, bank, insurance company). Local council planning office should have close enough information about total building floor area, land area, date of build and date of extension, etc. I would have thought 4-6 months discrepancy to be tolerable, but that's just me.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


kennyjaiz
5 Jul 2012, 10:52 PM
You may be right. But the information presented on a real estate listing is not systematic (i.e. random missing information) and full of error. Hopefully they at least validate the data integrity with secondary or historical sources (e.g. local council, bank, insurance company). Local council planning office should have close enough information about total building floor area, land area, date of build and date of extension, etc. I would have thought 4-6 months discrepancy to be tolerable, but that's just me.
The data would be better if they validated it. I will have another read of the methodology to see if they do, but seem to remember reading that they put default values in where they don't have the data, and update it as new listings for the same property come in. There was also a protocol for dealing with conflicting listings.

Strata plans have floor areas in them. Not sure if the floor areas of detached houses is recorded in any systematic way.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
TheRazorsEdge
No Avatar


miw
5 Jul 2012, 11:17 PM
The data would be better if they validated it. I will have another read of the methodology to see if they do, but seem to remember reading that they put default values in where they don't have the data, and update it as new listings for the same property come in. There was also a protocol for dealing with conflicting listings.

Strata plans have floor areas in them. Not sure if the floor areas of detached houses is recorded in any systematic way.
Ultimately, they are trying to build a daily index on an asset that is
1) Completely heterogeneous. Every property is a unique item.
2) Illiquid. Even at it's highest turnover rate, it takes at least 6 weeks from offer to settlement. Do you base the index on offers (that may fall through) or settled contract price?
3) Irrelevant. It really matters what the price of oil is today, next week, next quarter. Property, not so much.

This index is more like entertainment (because the crowd love property) than a financial index with any inherent use or meaning.
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
newjez
Member Avatar


miw
5 Jul 2012, 09:08 PM
Perthite
5 Jul 2012, 08:30 PM
With regards to the accuracy of RPData. What's with the voilent fluctuations in Perth?

http://www.rpdata.com/research/back_series.html
The whole index seems somewhat borked across the change in financial years, actually. I've been watching Brisbane and either armageddon is here, or there is severe short-term bogosity in evidence.
I could have sworn you made those two words up - but no - they are real (at least on google) :)

I think Perth fluctates because of (especially at the moment) low volumes. It's like looking at the REIWA suburb data.

I think you have to add 1-2% variance to Perth's data before you can read a significant change into it.
Edited by newjez, 5 Jul 2012, 11:43 PM.
A plug for my books on kindle Jack - a thin veil of duplicity

and Summer Days
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


TheRazorsEdge
5 Jul 2012, 11:33 PM
Ultimately, they are trying to build a daily index on an asset that is
1) Completely heterogeneous. Every property is a unique item.
2) Illiquid. Even at it's highest turnover rate, it takes at least 6 weeks from offer to settlement. Do you base the index on offers (that may fall through) or settled contract price?
3) Irrelevant. It really matters what the price of oil is today, next week, next quarter. Property, not so much.

This index is more like entertainment (because the crowd love property) than a financial index with any inherent use or meaning.
Yup. Unless it can prove itself as a derivative underlier, it might as well come out once a month.
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again!
AREPS™
Offline View Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4


Residex Property Market Predictions


Sydney Auction Results from APM and RPData | Melbourne Auction Results from APM, RPData and REIV | Demographia Debunked | Signs of a Property Bubble | Christopher Joye | Steve Keen | Philip Soos | Debt Consolidation | Demographia | Auction Clearance Rates | Australia Property | Auction Results | Macrobusiness | Daily Iron Ore Spot Price Chart | Property Observer | Australian Housing Market | Channel 9 The Block 2012 | Channel 9 The Block 2013 | The Block 2013 All Stars | Biz Motel The Block South Melbourne | Australian Property Bubble | Housing Affordability | Blogs | Gallery | Portal | China Property Forum | World Property Forum | Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook


The Australian Property Forum is an Australian economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets, including Aussie house prices, global house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a global house price crash or Australian house price crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is it better to buy using a home loan, or rent and save the difference? How might a credit crunch or peak debt environment impact Australian property prices? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices rise forever as people bet on future gains, refinance their mortgage and borrow against equity, or can we find a more sustainable long term approach to managing the Australian housing market? These are the type of questions we hope to address here, at the Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators! Whether you're an Australian Property Investor, First Home Buyer (FHB) or you're a happily renting tenant, this forum has something for everyone. The forum includes a blog feature, so members may create their own property blog. Members may talk finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, talk money, or discuss Somersoft style property investing topics. Are reverse home equity loans good or bad for society? Is the housing shortage a myth? What about negative gearing? Reverse mortgages? Are too many Australians taking on debt consolidation when they cannot even manage basic debt management? Are they gambling with their future? Were the Australian floods a black swan event, exposing many Australians with inadequate home insurance? How does asbestosis and mesothelioma impact home values? Is it a good time to buy a house in Australia? To find out, keep a close eye on auction results and auction clearance rates, and visit this forum often for all the latest house price news. Our forum members regularly debate and dissect the latest blogs from Business Spectator, Money Morning, Daily Reckoning, SmartCompany, Property Observer, Macrobusiness Superblog, Macro Investor, Macro Associates, The Economist, Bubblepedia, Demographia, Steve Keen's Debtwatch and Chris Joye's Aussie Macro Moments, as well as recent MSM articles from well known media economists and reporters such Ross Gittins, Michael Pascoe, Chris Zappone, Alan Kohler, Shane Oliver, Philip Soos, Louis Christopher (SQM Research), Harry Dent, Mike (Mish) Shedlock, Jeremy Grantham, Gerard Minack, Leith van Onselen, Chris Becker, David Llewellyn-Smith, Chris Vedelago and more. We're the first to report and discuss the latest house price data from APM (Australian Property Monitors), Residex, RP Data Rismark, REIV (Real Estate Institute of Victoria), REINSW (Real Estate Institute of NSW) and REIA (Real Estate Institute of Australia), HIA (Housing Industry Association), RBA (Reserve Bank of Australia), API (Australian Property Institute), and the ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics).

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. Posts on Australian Property Forum may contain links to other websites operated by third parties. These websites are not under the control of Australian Property Forum and APF management is not responsible for their content.

It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. Australian Property Forum members are solely responsible for the accuracy and authenticity of their posts, including any alterations made to posts. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy