|
Louis Christopher SQM cocks up his attack on RP Data
|
|
Topic Started: 4 Jul 2012, 10:14 AM (2,840 Views)
|
|
Shadow
|
4 Jul 2012, 02:08 PM
Post #31
|
Evil Zealot Specufestor
- Posts:
- 5,995
- Group:
- Diamond Member
- Member
- #22
- Joined:
- 02/11/2010
|
- Ben D
- 4 Jul 2012, 01:15 PM
A good place to start is Christopher Joye's bullish position on property. His unrelenting position seems like he would do anything to make the numbers look good (kind of like a few people around here) which detracts from his credibility. All through 2011, Chris Joye and the RPData index consistently reported price falls greater in magnitude than those reported by the ABS.
The MacroBears actually switched their preferred index from ABS to RPData during this period, because RPData was the most bearish.
Edited by Shadow, 4 Jul 2012, 02:08 PM.
|
Shadow's Blog - The Australian Housing Market 1 - Debunking Demographia. Demographia Survey Debunked. Australian housing is not particularly unaffordable by global standards. 2 - USA, Ireland, UK, Spain and Japan Property Bubbles versus Australia. All confirmed property bubbles had one thing in common... a particular house price/income ratio pattern. 3 - Banks can't margin call on residential property unless borrower defaults, because residential property loans are regulated by the NCCP Act 2009. 4 - Housing is the second highest taxed sector of the Australian Economy. Renters don't pay their fair share of tax, and are subsidised by high taxes incurred by homeowners. 5 - Epic Fail! Steve Keen's Bad Calls and Predictions.
Parse: A rep's spare spear pares pears, reaps as per AREPS.
|
| |
|
kennyjaiz
|
4 Jul 2012, 02:13 PM
Post #32
|
- Posts:
- 1,153
- Group:
- Platinum Member
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- 29/10/2010
|
- Ben D
- 4 Jul 2012, 02:02 PM
I understand what he is trying to sell, but it is simply not a daily index even if he calls it one. That is what it is trying to do:
- Quote:
-
The RP Data-Rismark Daily Home Value Index aims to measure daily movements in the value of Australian housing markets. Rather than relying solely on transacted sale prices to provide a measure of housing market conditions, the RP Data-Rismark Daily Home Value Index is based on a ‘hedonic’ methodology which includes the attributes of properties that are transacting as part of the analysis. Understanding factors such as the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, the land area and the geographic context of the property allows for a much more accurate analysis of the true value of movements across specific housing markets. This method also allows for compositional change in consumer buying patterns when measuring capital gains.
The RP Data-Rismark Daily Home Value Index provides daily capital growth measurements across three broad housing types: houses, units’ and a “combined dwellings” index that includes both houses and units. The index results are released daily for Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane (including Gold Coast), Adelaide, Perth and the combined capitals, which is a composite of these cities. Historical back series are available on a subscription basis.
I don't think the term "daily index" is a misnomer. The outstanding question for me is whether or not it is a valid method to determine the daily capital growth measurement. Some "experts" seem to believe so, others do not.
|
|
|
| |
|
Mr Griffin
|
4 Jul 2012, 02:19 PM
Post #33
|
- Posts:
- 218
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #1,283
- Joined:
- 18/10/2011
|
I didn't read posts after the first couple but the fact that you are all arguing about daily, monthly or even yearly indices shows that you are really missing the forest from the trees here. There is much, much larger things at play here than our short term house price movements that will have a massive change to life as we know it going forward.
But yes Stingberg, he said 1 percent when it was meant to be 1 point on the index scale. So that means house prices to moon...you fucking tool.
|
|
|
| |
|
kennyjaiz
|
4 Jul 2012, 03:35 PM
Post #34
|
- Posts:
- 1,153
- Group:
- Platinum Member
- Member
- #11
- Joined:
- 29/10/2010
|
- Mr Griffin
- 4 Jul 2012, 02:19 PM
I didn't read posts after the first couple but the fact that you are all arguing about daily, monthly or even yearly indices shows that you are really missing the forest from the trees here. There is much, much larger things at play here than our short term house price movements that will have a massive change to life as we know it going forward.
But yes Stingberg, he said 1 percent when it was meant to be 1 point on the index scale. So that means house prices to moon...you fucking tool. Don't necessarily disagree with your first bit.
But to put the OP into perspective - Louis has questioned the reliability of the RPdata daily index, allegedly based on a misinterpretation of the data. BD only later in this thread - clarified his scepticism is based on the unlikelihood of the reported significant increments in Feb and Jun (not the general trend) - unsubstantiated by other economic indicators.
It's okay for BD to question the RPdata daily index. It is also okay for Stringberg to question BD's evaluation.
|
|
|
| |
|
TheRazorsEdge
|
4 Jul 2012, 08:20 PM
Post #35
|
- Posts:
- 405
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #2,160
- Joined:
- 26/06/2012
|
- kennyjaiz
- 4 Jul 2012, 01:07 PM
Christopher Joye cannot even read a simple chart: http://christopherjoye.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/aussie-banks-most-profitable-in-world.html
I hope he is not in anyway personally involved with the creation or measurement of the index.
Ah wait, from the article you reference he says this: The new daily index was designed by a team of PhD-qualified mathematicians and statisticians over a period of three years.
Thank god he wasn't involved.
Seriously though, it was quite an interesting read. What I get from the article is that their hedonic measurement will form the basis for the daily index, it doesn't mention what independent variables will be used however.
|
|
|
| |
|
miw
|
4 Jul 2012, 08:33 PM
Post #36
|
- Posts:
- 3,911
- Group:
- Diamond Member
- Member
- #1,917
- Joined:
- 22/04/2012
|
- TheRazorsEdge
- 4 Jul 2012, 08:20 PM
Christopher Joye cannot even read a simple chart: http://christopherjoye.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/aussie-banks-most-profitable-in-world.htmlI hope he is not in anyway personally involved with the creation or measurement of the index. Ah wait, from the article you reference he says this: The new daily index was designed by a team of PhD-qualified mathematicians and statisticians over a period of three years. Thank god he wasn't involved. Seriously though, it was quite an interesting read. What I get from the article is that their hedonic measurement will form the basis for the daily index, it doesn't mention what independent variables will be used however. Is this what you were looking for under "independent variables"? (They call these the "hedonic variables" in the methodology paper.
Suburb Land size (m2) if property type = house Street classification (highway, main road, cul de sac etc.) Property type (eg. free standing house, semi etc. for houses) Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of car spaces Pool (Y/N) Waterfront (Y/N) Air Conditioning (Y/N) View (Y/N)
|
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again! AREPS™
|
| |
|
TheRazorsEdge
|
4 Jul 2012, 09:28 PM
Post #37
|
- Posts:
- 405
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #2,160
- Joined:
- 26/06/2012
|
- miw
- 4 Jul 2012, 08:33 PM
Is this what you were looking for under "independent variables"? (They call these the "hedonic variables" in the methodology paper.
Suburb Land size (m2) if property type = house Street classification (highway, main road, cul de sac etc.) Property type (eg. free standing house, semi etc. for houses) Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of car spaces Pool (Y/N) Waterfront (Y/N) Air Conditioning (Y/N) View (Y/N) Nice, thanks. I haven't seen the methodology paper.
For me the first three of those variables plus (1) Proximity to train station/major bus route (2) Proximity to primary school would be enough.
People put on such 'airs' about their house, but most houses can be converted into almost anything for 100-150K, so who cares really about the pool or bedrooms.
As for Waterfront, it's a strange thing. When I first moved to Sydney, Cabarita was a dioxin dump, now it has million dollar penthouses with water views (on top of a dioxin dump). What is it about looking at water that is worth half a million dollars?
Chris Joye still can't read a simple chart though. 
|
|
|
| |
|
miw
|
5 Jul 2012, 12:00 AM
Post #38
|
- Posts:
- 3,911
- Group:
- Diamond Member
- Member
- #1,917
- Joined:
- 22/04/2012
|
- TheRazorsEdge
- 4 Jul 2012, 09:28 PM
For me the first three of those variables plus (1) Proximity to train station/major bus route (2) Proximity to primary school would be enough.
Yes I was wondering about proximity to amenities as well, in particular public transport and schools. It certainly influences the market price.
|
Last time I followed my dreams it led me to a casino, a bar, a gun shop, then a bank. Never again! AREPS™
|
| |
|
Alex Barton
|
5 Jul 2012, 09:57 AM
Post #39
|
Administrator
- Posts:
- 11,488
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- 27/10/2010
|
- Quote:
-
The house price data the RBA uses: Christopher JoyeBy Christopher Joye Wednesday, 04 July 2012 After each monthly board meeting, the RBA publishes its official "chart pack", which is a detailed 30-page presentation on the Australian economy that it uses to brief members. The RBA's chart pack includes one chart on Australian house prices, covering the individual capital cities, a national weighted average of the capital cities, and a rest of state index. For many years the RBA used to only use the ABS house price data in this chart. Some time ago the RBA switched to RP Data-Rismark. RP Data-Rismark's new daily house price index is the only house price data used by the RBA in the chart pack. Specifically, the RBA takes the daily index number for the end of each month, and then seasonally adjusts the data over time. (The RBA was also consulted as part of the daily index development process.) The chart below was published by the RBA yesterday. It illustrates RP Data-Rismark's daily index data through to the end of May (i.e., it does not include the latest June data). Further to my post here on different house price measures, I would note that the RBA's team of 100-plus economists can use whatever house price data that they deem provides the best possible insights into the market. In every quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy the RBA chooses to report three different indices – from RP Data-Rismark, APM and the ABS – although the charts in the SMP, and the RBA's official conclusions in the text, all normally reference the RP Data-Rismark findings. For the avoidance of doubt, the RBA does not rely exclusively on any one index provider. The RBA inspects and analyses at least three (i.e., RP Data-Rismark, APM and the ABS). But given the significant differences in the technical methods, it has developed preferences over time.  Read more: http://www.propertyobserver.com.au/rba-rate-decision/the-rbas-official-house-price-data-comes-from-rp-data-rismark-christopher-joye
|
|
Follow APF on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Zetaboards Terms of Use
|
| |
|
Aussiehouseprices
|
5 Jul 2012, 01:46 PM
Post #40
|
- Posts:
- 712
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- 18/02/2011
|
- miw
- 4 Jul 2012, 08:33 PM
Is this what you were looking for under "independent variables"? (They call these the "hedonic variables" in the methodology paper.
Suburb Land size (m2) if property type = house Street classification (highway, main road, cul de sac etc.) Property type (eg. free standing house, semi etc. for houses) Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of car spaces Pool (Y/N) Waterfront (Y/N) Air Conditioning (Y/N) View (Y/N) What about age of house / how recently renovated? Say I buy an old place, renovate every room and sell for a higher price, because none of the variables listed have changed, it will help to boost the index. I would have thought that the point of a hedonic index is that it shouldn't.
|
Aussie House Prices blog Latest post: Real Estate 101 - Lecture 1: Never use the "F" word
|
| |
|
Aussiehouseprices
|
5 Jul 2012, 01:52 PM
Post #41
|
- Posts:
- 712
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- 18/02/2011
|
- miw
- 4 Jul 2012, 08:33 PM
Is this what you were looking for under "independent variables"? (They call these the "hedonic variables" in the methodology paper.
Suburb Land size (m2) if property type = house Street classification (highway, main road, cul de sac etc.) Property type (eg. free standing house, semi etc. for houses) Number of bedrooms Number of bathrooms Number of car spaces Pool (Y/N) Waterfront (Y/N) Air Conditioning (Y/N) View (Y/N) If you have a view of a sewage farm, would you get a "Y" or "N"?
|
Aussie House Prices blog Latest post: Real Estate 101 - Lecture 1: Never use the "F" word
|
| |
|
The Punisher
|
5 Jul 2012, 02:52 PM
Post #42
|
- Posts:
- 65
- Group:
- Member
- Member
- #564
- Joined:
- 07/05/2011
|
Gotta laugh at the ones here who front run Chris Joye.
Doesn't make it any less convincing that they aren't Chris Joye.
|
|
|
| |
|
Vatutto Bene
|
5 Jul 2012, 02:57 PM
Post #43
|
|
- Posts:
- 71
- Group:
- Member
- Member
- #1,196
- Joined:
- 04/10/2011
|
- The Punisher
- 5 Jul 2012, 02:52 PM
Gotta laugh at the ones here who front run Chris Joye.
Doesn't make it any less convincing that they aren't Chris Joye. Who?
Hah yes - the other professional pie eater!
|
|
I came here for the cookies, but all I got was crumbs.
|
| |
|
TheRazorsEdge
|
5 Jul 2012, 03:10 PM
Post #44
|
- Posts:
- 405
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #2,160
- Joined:
- 26/06/2012
|
- Aussiehouseprices
- 5 Jul 2012, 01:52 PM
If you have a view of a sewage farm, would you get a "Y" or "N"? Sewage is grown on farms?
|
|
|
| |
|
Aussiehouseprices
|
5 Jul 2012, 03:53 PM
Post #45
|
- Posts:
- 712
- Group:
- Gold Member
- Member
- #328
- Joined:
- 18/02/2011
|
- TheRazorsEdge
- 5 Jul 2012, 03:10 PM
Sewage is grown on farms? Where did you think it was grown??
|
Aussie House Prices blog Latest post: Real Estate 101 - Lecture 1: Never use the "F" word
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|