Ratings agency Standard & Poor's has warned Australia's AAA credit rating could be reviewed unless significant cuts are made to the budget, providing the Abbott government with much-needed ammunition as it tries to win support for its fiscal roadmap.
A leading sovereign analyst for S&P, Craig Michaels, says a review might be required if the coalition is unable to pass at least "some" of the $37 billion in savings announced in last week's budget.
Labor has vowed to block about $18 billion in cuts and tax hikes, while Palmer United Party leader Clive Palmer has also threatened to veto various measures aimed at attacking Australia's deficit.
Treasurer Joe Hockey's first budget, handed down last Tuesday, showed Australia would accumulate $60 billion in deficits over the next four years.
Mr Hockey outlined a plan that would return the nation to surplus no earlier than 2018-19, but the government has been facing a political and community backlash over planned cuts to welfare and tax hikes.
Mr Michaels told the Australian Financial Review that if "sizeable budget deficits were considered acceptable at the political and the community level then we might reassess, certainly, government commitment and also potentially the trajectory for public sector debt".
A cut to Australia's credit rating would increase the government's cost of borrowing, and would damage the government politically.
Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s has warned Australia’s AAA credit rating is at risk unless substantial cuts are made to the budget.
Lead sovereign analyst for S&P, Craig Michaels, told the Australian Financial Review the agency was looking to see the government improve budget performance over the next few years.
If it looked as though “sizeable budget deficits were considered acceptable at the political and the community level then we might reassess, certainly, government commitment and also potentially the trajectory for public sector debt”, Michaels told the newspaper.
Despite this warning, a spokesperson for S&P said the ratings agency currently has a stable outlook on Australia’s AAA rating.
“Which effectively means there's less than a one in three chance of a rating change in the next two years,” the spokesperson says.
We asked three economists, Shane Oliver from AMP Capital, Warren Hogan from ANZ and Alan Oster from the NAB, whether Australia’s credit rating is really at risk.
Also asked was whether credit ratings even matter in light of a string of recent court cases against the ratings agency in which S&P’s lawyers argued claims to its ratings being “independent”, “objective” and “free of conflicts of interests” are just marketing “puffery” anyway that “reasonable investors” shouldn’t rely on.
Is Australia’s AAA credit rating really at risk?
Oliver: “It’s not particularly surprising [S&P] would say this. It’s always an issue for Australia as we have relatively strong fundamentals but that doesn’t mean we are not vulnerable.”
Oliver says S&P’s warning “partly supports the government’s line of reasoning that we have to keep the budget under control” but the question is how this is done.
Oster: “Really what [S&P] are saying is there is less than a one in three chance they will change [the rating] if the budget doesn’t get through.”
“Those comments are looking a little bit political,” he says.
Hogan: “The important point is the Australian government can lose its AAA rating more quickly than other governments and the reason for that is we have a lot of leverage in our economy outside of government as we have very high household debt and very high foreign debt.”
Hogan says because of this even though Australia’s debt is only projected to go to 15%, if it did reach 30%, Australia would be under some pressure even though countries like Germany have debt levels of 100%.
“I think what S&P is getting at is it would become worried if the government puts forward a budget repair program that is blocked, it would see that as a material impediment to improving Australia’s financial system,” he says.
Does it matter if Australia loses it’s AAA rating?
Oliver: “Cynics might argue they often just reflect current conditions anyway, but by the same token they are reflecting valid concerns which are out there.
“One might question the role the ratings agencies played in facilitating the bubble in and around the US sub prime mortgages.”
“But I would say we would ignore it at our peril, all S&P is really saying is common sense.”
Oliver warns Australia could be at risk of going down the path of European countries where debt levels spiral out of control.
“We shouldn’t care so much about the rating, it is more about the consequences that flow from escalating debt levels,” he says.
“It would be wrong of Australians to just shoot the messenger and say ‘It’s just S&P what do they know, they got sued by the US government’.”
Oster: “It matters in terms of psychology.”
“This is not one of the ratings agencies finest hours. They have a track record of making sensational comments. If Australia’s net debt is a problem then there aren’t any AAA countries in the world.”
Hogan: “Right now a downgrade would be unlikely to have a material impact on the cost of finance for the government and that is really the main channel credit ratings impact.
“Right now it isn’t a problem, but that doesn’t mean it won’t become one as Australia is a very small economy and highly integrated into the world economy.
“To not have a AAA rating could make Australia a riskier proposition should the international situation change.”
Standard & Poor’s ratings are a crock of shite anyway. Paid shills, paid by the corporations and nations they rate. But in once sense it is right, sort of. We are still ahead of the rest of the world, up there with Norway etc at least. It's just a pity we don't have more conventional oil. That's what the world can't do without.
And what happened to all those fabled oil shale deposits the bulls here were praising last year? Why aren't we digging it up and making a fortune? Because it was all BS that's why.
Shadow was hopelessly wrong about the Gold Bull Market. What else is he wrong about?
The federal government may be frustrated by opposition to its first budget, but one major global credit rating agency appears more relaxed.
Standard & Poor's has affirmed Australia's AAA rating, saying the nation's public finances remain strong with low debt and deficits.
S&P credit analyst Craig Michaels said the stable outlook was based on Australia's historically conservative budgetary policies remaining in place so that deficits continue to narrow and government debt remains low.
Although many of the budget measures are yet to clear Parliament, S&P expects compromises will be reached eventually.
It's not the political rhetoric the government can use to persuade opposition parties to pass the budget, but it does mean Australia won't be hit by higher borrowing costs as a result of a downgrade.
The government can also take some comfort from evidence consumers appear to be getting over Treasurer Joe Hockey's first budget. The latest ANZ-Roy Morgan consumer confidence index has now completely retraced the sharp deterioration in the weeks around the budget.
When did these ratings agencies become the source of all wisdom? Is it the case that the analysts who work at these companies are smarter than the rest of us? No? Why do we even listen to them?
When did these ratings agencies become the source of all wisdom? Is it the case that the analysts who work at these companies are smarter than the rest of us? No? Why do we even listen to them?
Isn't it more the case that the credit rating determines the interest rate on bonds?
One of them supposed to be very corrupt, aren't they? Can't remember which
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy