By Ambrose Evans-PritchardEconomicsLast updated: April 26th, 2012
Is the housing boom coming to an end in China?
Here is some food for thought, if you are a China "take-over-the-world" bull.
I have just been listening to a talk on the Chinese housing market by Xianfang Ren, Beijing analyst for IHS Global Insight.
Land sales make up 30pc of total tax revenue for the central government and 70pc for local government. (For those of us who watched the Irish state balloon on the back of property taxes – when they had a fat budget surplus – this has a familiar ring.)
Construction makes up 10pc of total jobs, and a further 20pc indirectly in cement, steel, metallurgy etc. The government is building 36m homes for the poor, but that will start to run down in two years or so.
Residential investment typically peaks at 8pc to 9pc of GDP for emerging nations during their catch-up growth spurts. It is already 12pc in China.
Japan’s ratio peaked in 1973, long before the property price bubble burst. China has almost certainly peaked too on this crucial measure.
The minimum down-payment rate on mortgages is 30pc, so leverage is in theory low. (How this can be the case when the IMF says that the house price to incomes ratio is 16 to 18 times in the Eastern cities of Beijing, Tinajing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou has long been a mystery).
"At first sight China looks fine. Unfortunately, there is a big problem of misclassification of loans. The financial system has much larger exposure to real estate than appears, and the weak links are the real estate trusts and non-bank lending. The smaller developers are cash-flow constrained and will find it hard to roll over debts. Any defaults will have to be recognised immediately."
This may be happening already, since housing sales slumped 25pc in the first quarter.
Meanwhile, the demographic crunch hit last year. China’s dependency ratio – ie children plus elderly in proportion to those of working age – touched bottom at 28pc and has now begun a relentless climb that will get worse every year for decades. (The ageing crisis is not yet as bad as Japan at the onset of the Lost Decade in the early 1990s. The old-age dependency ratio is 11pc compared to 18pc in Japan in the early 1990s).
The urbanisation rate has just passed the "inflection point" of 50pc when growth in developing economies starts to slow sharply.
A week ago I heard a talk at the ChunQiu Institute in London by Nobel laureate Edmund Phelps (one of the truly great Nobel economists who first debunked "Keynesian" misuse of the growth/unemployment trade-off or Phillips Curve and has devoted the last part of his academic life to trying to understand China).
His view is that China has already reached the point where it can no longer offset soaring wage costs with productivity gains imported through Western technology. It has hit the time-honoured wall. Diminishing returns are setting in, and there lies the "middle-income trap" that ensnares most challengers.
He expects productivity growth to converge with US levels within ten years, but at a much lower per capita. Whether China has the free-thinking, inventive culture to grasp the prize in the next historical phase is far from clear.
Be that as it may, Xianfang Ren said China has the means to bail out the banking system and property market in this cycle, and will use them if need be. "Housing is way too important to allow a hard landing."
These include deposits (170pc of GDP), government revenues (30pc), the assets of state behemoths (75pc), foreign reserves (50pc) of GDP – I don’t agree on this last point since the FX reserves cannot be repatriated without a big currency rise and a shock for exporters. It would amount to monetary tightening.
This could all go wrong if there is a "perfect storm", if China is hit by an external shock and at the same time makes big policy errors like Japan at the end of its bubble when it raised interest rates 400 basis points and imposed a land tax at the wrong moment.
"We don’t think there will necessarily be a housing bust but the chance of another boom is very low." Indeed.
Much China debate in the West is hijacked by ultra-bulls or ultra-bears. Xianfang Ren actually knows what she is talking about so I pass on her thoughts.
There again, after the Bo Xilai saga, can anybody really say they know what China’s political landscape will look like in 10 years?
By Ambrose Evans-PritchardEconomicsLast updated: April 26th, 2012
Is the housing boom coming to an end in China?
Here is some food for thought, if you are a China "take-over-the-world" bull.
I have just been listening to a talk on the Chinese housing market by Xianfang Ren, Beijing analyst for IHS Global Insight.
Land sales make up 30pc of total tax revenue for the central government and 70pc for local government. (For those of us who watched the Irish state balloon on the back of property taxes – when they had a fat budget surplus – this has a familiar ring.)
Construction makes up 10pc of total jobs, and a further 20pc indirectly in cement, steel, metallurgy etc. The government is building 36m homes for the poor, but that will start to run down in two years or so.
Residential investment typically peaks at 8pc to 9pc of GDP for emerging nations during their catch-up growth spurts. It is already 12pc in China.
Japan’s ratio peaked in 1973, long before the property price bubble burst. China has almost certainly peaked too on this crucial measure.
The minimum down-payment rate on mortgages is 30pc, so leverage is in theory low. (How this can be the case when the IMF says that the house price to incomes ratio is 16 to 18 times in the Eastern cities of Beijing, Tinajing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou has long been a mystery).
"At first sight China looks fine. Unfortunately, there is a big problem of misclassification of loans. The financial system has much larger exposure to real estate than appears, and the weak links are the real estate trusts and non-bank lending. The smaller developers are cash-flow constrained and will find it hard to roll over debts. Any defaults will have to be recognised immediately."
This may be happening already, since housing sales slumped 25pc in the first quarter.
Meanwhile, the demographic crunch hit last year. China’s dependency ratio – ie children plus elderly in proportion to those of working age – touched bottom at 28pc and has now begun a relentless climb that will get worse every year for decades. (The ageing crisis is not yet as bad as Japan at the onset of the Lost Decade in the early 1990s. The old-age dependency ratio is 11pc compared to 18pc in Japan in the early 1990s).
The urbanisation rate has just passed the "inflection point" of 50pc when growth in developing economies starts to slow sharply.
A week ago I heard a talk at the ChunQiu Institute in London by Nobel laureate Edmund Phelps (one of the truly great Nobel economists who first debunked "Keynesian" misuse of the growth/unemployment trade-off or Phillips Curve and has devoted the last part of his academic life to trying to understand China).
His view is that China has already reached the point where it can no longer offset soaring wage costs with productivity gains imported through Western technology. It has hit the time-honoured wall. Diminishing returns are setting in, and there lies the "middle-income trap" that ensnares most challengers.
He expects productivity growth to converge with US levels within ten years, but at a much lower per capita. Whether China has the free-thinking, inventive culture to grasp the prize in the next historical phase is far from clear.
Be that as it may, Xianfang Ren said China has the means to bail out the banking system and property market in this cycle, and will use them if need be. "Housing is way too important to allow a hard landing."
These include deposits (170pc of GDP), government revenues (30pc), the assets of state behemoths (75pc), foreign reserves (50pc) of GDP – I don’t agree on this last point since the FX reserves cannot be repatriated without a big currency rise and a shock for exporters. It would amount to monetary tightening.
This could all go wrong if there is a "perfect storm", if China is hit by an external shock and at the same time makes big policy errors like Japan at the end of its bubble when it raised interest rates 400 basis points and imposed a land tax at the wrong moment.
"We don’t think there will necessarily be a housing bust but the chance of another boom is very low." Indeed.
Much China debate in the West is hijacked by ultra-bulls or ultra-bears. Xianfang Ren actually knows what she is talking about so I pass on her thoughts.
There again, after the Bo Xilai saga, can anybody really say they know what China’s political landscape will look like in 10 years?
Interesting, everyone else doesn't think China can bail out this sector -AGAIN - no way, in fact thats the entire point.
The chinese have had THREE stimulus, the debt from which have still never been dealt with, whats more the primary reason for the current restraints is not to slow down the housing market - far from it, it is in order to FIGHT INFLATION - another stimulus would be putting petrol on this fire.
Sorry - false.
And while we are at it - developers are already going bankrupt and the rate is escalating wildly - and there has been no response, so sorry, this has already been debunked.
I was reading an old car magazine the other day (I collect them) from 1978, reviewing the Mercedes Benz 450SEL 6.9. It included the question "will there ever be a sedan this fast and comfortable again". It cost a lot by the standard of the day, the equivalent to several hundred thousand today.
Today, a V8 Calais or Fairmont (G6E?) is faster, better equipped, safer, vastly more fuel efficient and more comfortable. And it costs nothing like the old Merc did.
I'm very cautious of predictions that use the term 'forever'.
So you have now resorted to trolling that your arguments have all proved pointless. Is that comment worthy of rolling on the floor laughing when it is you that misunderstood, let me refrase it for the frasers out there. China has peaked, is now past its peak and is decending. Hope its clearer to you now Mr Fraser
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy