Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4
Where is the Science?
Topic Started: 25 Apr 2012, 05:12 PM (1,965 Views)
Catweasel
Member Avatar


Joseph
25 Apr 2012, 11:09 PM
Really, Why come and ask serious questions when your whole demeanor is the apex of silliness.... please.

Go home and think about your internet persona. Are you attempting to challenge readers or are you merely trolling.

ATM the cat is chasing it's own tail.
Catweasel laugh. And if a Catweasel be the troll, what does it make of mouzealots and shallowness of mouse? Both of the which seem the muted by any the concrete and valid.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
nipa hut
Default APF Avatar


Catweasel
25 Apr 2012, 11:41 PM
And if a Catweasel be the troll, what does it make of mouzealots and shallowness of mouse?
Who cares?

Make a point in English and be welcomed to the forum...
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


nipa hut
25 Apr 2012, 11:49 PM
Who cares?

Make a point in English and be welcomed to the forum...
That seem to be a conclude. Language of a Catweasel is a unaccept. But anti-science is a welcome and appreciated by mouzealot and mouse.

Catweasel think it just prove the point.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Joseph
Default APF Avatar


Catweasel
25 Apr 2012, 11:41 PM
Catweasel laugh. And if a Catweasel be the troll, what does it make of mouzealots and shallowness of mouse? Both of the which seem the muted by any the concrete and valid.
eh?????????????????????????????
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
nipa hut
Default APF Avatar


Catweasel
25 Apr 2012, 11:58 PM


Catweasel think it just prove the point.
Er, yes,

To the extent that "anti-science" is winning, it is in the context of Catweasel failing to participate in the battle in any meaningful way--e.g. by speaking English.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
carter
Member Avatar
Tasman Vagrant

Catweasel
25 Apr 2012, 11:58 PM
Catweasel think it just prove the point.
I suspect you're the only person who thinks that. Nobody else knows what point you're trying to make. Sorry.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
TMR
Member Avatar


Catweasel -

My interpretation of the majority of your recent posts (the ones that I can bear to trawl through trying to get the meaning of) is the following:

- It is nigh-on impossible to construct accurate models of what house prices are going to do;
- There is loads of data out there, but it is often presented in meaningless ways;
- Potential home buyers/investor take the word of property experts as gospel when they shouldn't;
- The whole housing market is a complete scam/government manipulation based on fear.

Is that generally right?

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


TMR
26 Apr 2012, 12:38 AM
Catweasel -

My interpretation of the majority of your recent posts (the ones that I can bear to trawl through trying to get the meaning of) is the following:

- It is nigh-on impossible to construct accurate models of what house prices are going to do;
- There is loads of data out there, but it is often presented in meaningless ways;
- Potential home buyers/investor take the word of property experts as gospel when they shouldn't;
- The whole housing market is a complete scam/government manipulation based on fear.

Is that generally right?

Catweasel say can I ask it:

-- How does it think that a model of mouse house the price actually construct? If it can be the accurately construct, why is it the be that so many in a world get it the wrong (include a world leading the banks and a world's predominant the central bankers and a world's leading the academics)?

-- If there so much the quality data out a there, how it be the possible that expert can barely predict or do a estimate in a near term as the short as 4-8 the weeks?

-- Yes, why is the mouse the so accepting of expert, white shoe, media, and mouzealot? Surely if it ask it what its predictive model is and its limitation, what the kind of answer does it expect?

Catweasel take up a challenge and confront leading property expert and REIT. It the most embarrass the issue it can a ask it.

-- Is govt the scam same as beast it created and now a not understand how to a control when its relevance is a beyond its control?

More the question it ask itself, a more it can understand place in universe. If its place is in a fear and hope of the mouzealot and mouse, that entirely a fine. But it not the only option in its life.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
TMR
Member Avatar


Catweasel
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 AM
Catweasel say can I ask it:

-- How does it think that a model of mouse house the price actually construct? If it can be the accurately construct, why is it the be that so many in a world get it the wrong (include a world leading the banks and a world's predominant the central bankers and a world's leading the academics)?

-- If there so much the quality data out a there, how it be the possible that expert can barely predict or do a estimate in a near term as the short as 4-8 the weeks?

-- Yes, why is the mouse the so accepting of expert, white shoe, media, and mouzealot? Surely if it ask it what its predictive model is and its limitation, what the kind of answer does it expect?

Catweasel take up a challenge and confront leading property expert and REIT. It the most embarrass the issue it can a ask it.

-- Is govt the scam same as beast it created and now a not understand how to a control when its relevance is a beyond its control?

More the question it ask itself, a more it can understand place in universe. If its place is in a fear and hope of the mouzealot and mouse, that entirely a fine. But it not the only option in its life.
So basically your argument is that economic modelling of house prices is extremely inaccurate?

TMR laugh. TMR the say it easy to use many the words while talking the "blindingly obvious". Added the benefit for cat is for when the ambiguity can make hard for the reader to do the understanding, therefore easy for the cat to make many vague statement without readers having recourse for using the constructive criticism. TMR think why? when the cat appears like might be having at least half the brain to engage for to debate, rather than the use reductio ad absurdum to say "no-one can predict anything so there's no use listening to anyone" in lingua even more absurdum.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


TMR
26 Apr 2012, 09:56 AM
So basically your argument is that economic modelling of house prices is extremely inaccurate?

TMR laugh. TMR the say it easy to use many the words while talking the "blindingly obvious". Added the benefit for cat is for when the ambiguity can make hard for the reader to do the understanding, therefore easy for the cat to make many vague statement without readers having recourse for using the constructive criticism. TMR think why? when the cat appears like might be having at least half the brain to engage for to debate, rather than the use reductio ad absurdum to say "no-one can predict anything so there's no use listening to anyone" in lingua even more absurdum.
Catweasel say actually a modeling of the house price (not a economic, that a completely the different), can be the extremely the accurate if it create the model itself!

How the ever, it have the world of expert and mouzealot predicting a future the asset price of mouse house to its the captive audience of empty-heads. Does it have the financial model for such a predict? It a sure it a does to some the extent. Does it have a rigorous to be a useful to understand complexity of a parameter or variable? If so, why the predictor not a state it clearly so that mouse clearly the understand?

Of the course, if it take a step back in the time, even as a little as 12 months ago, it would be labelled batshit mad if it call a wider environmental landscape as it look a like today.

Hell, mouse even have no the idea how economic crisis in the Europe have the impact upon Aussie mouse house. Yet mouzealot and other arrogance prance the around thinking it know it all.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 4



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy