Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Builders Shrink Great Australian Dream as Priciest Home Market Falters; Australian homebuilders responding to declining demand and higher land costs by reducing sizes of houses and lots
Topic Started: 5 Dec 2011, 03:05 PM (968 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Builders Shrink ‘Great Australian Dream’ as Priciest Home Market Falters

By Nichola Saminather - Dec 5, 2011 12:01 AM ET

Australian homebuilders are responding to declining demand and higher land costs by reducing the sizes of houses and lots.

Stockland (SGP), Australia’s biggest listed home builder, has cut the average size of plots in its house-and-land packages by almost 20 percent to 481 square meters (5,177 square feet) over three years. Australand Property Group (ALZ), a unit of Singapore’s CapitaLand Ltd. (CAPL), is redesigning homes as it shrinks them, while Peet Ltd. (PPC), which has 70 housing estates, is building on smaller lots with shared barbecue and exercise areas to compensate.

Higher prices for land and materials and increasing wages and taxes are pushing costs higher at a time the prices developers can charge are restrained as the developed world’s most expensive housing market cools. Home prices in Australia’s eight capital cities dropped 4 percent in the year to Oct. 31, according to RP Data, the most since the real estate researcher began compiling the figures in 1999.

“There’s an affordability crisis in Australia, and one way of keeping the price point where people can afford it is to reduce the size,” said Peter Sherrie, national president of industry group the Urban Development Institute of Australia. “With some innovative house designs, developers are able to provide a perfectly acceptable dwelling on a much smaller lot.”

Pursuit of the Great Australian Dream -- ownership of a stand-alone house on a quarter-acre piece of land -- has seen households double their debt load as a proportion of disposable income in the past 15 years to 154 percent in the quarter ended June 30, according to central bank figures. That’s higher than the 133 percent ratio Americans accumulated at the height of the U.S. sub prime-mortgage boom.
Australian Dream

The Great Australian Dream is a phrase derived from the American Dream, which equates prosperity and freedom with land ownership. In Australia, it encapsulates an idealized suburban lifestyle of grassy backyards, swimming pools and barbecues.

At 243.6 square meters, Australian houses are the biggest in the world, according to an August report by Commonwealth Securities Ltd., a unit of Commonwealth Bank of Australia. The average house in the U.S. was 222.2 square meters in 2010, Canada’s homes averaged 177 square meters and Japan’s 132 square meters, it said.

Stockland has decided to build smaller homes closer to public spaces rather than with big backyards, said Andrew Whitson, general manager for Victoria state at the company. The Sydney-based company has increased the proportion of homes on lots less than 450 square meters to 50 percent of all its housing projects, from 27 percent three years ago, it said at its full-year results presentation in August.

“The push is driven not only by affordability, but also to cater to our growing population and to make more efficient use of land,” Whitson said.
Urban Sprawl

With about two-thirds of Australia’s 22.8 million people living in the nation’s eight capitals, cities have historically expanded out, rather than up, to fit a growing population.

Melbourne, the nation’s densest city, had 530 people per square kilometer (0.4 square mile) and Sydney, the nation’s most populous city, had 380 as of June 2010, a March statistics bureau report shows. That compares with about 10,194 people per square kilometer in New York, according to the city’s department of planning, 6,017 in Tokyo and 7,126 in Singapore, according to statistics bureau data for each city.

State governments are now pushing developers to build closer to urban centers. Authorities require between 50 percent and 70 percent of new housing estates to be located within existing city limits, are restricting land releases on city fringes, and are demanding developers help pay for roads, transport and other amenities when building outside the limits.
Smaller Lots

“Developer charges, infrastructure charges are escalating,” said Andrew Harvey, senior economist at the Housing Industry Association, Australia’s biggest residential building organization. “They have to pay for schools and bike paths and a range of other gold-plated facilities, and that gets passed on in its entirety to home buyers.”

That’s helping push up the price of land plots even as they shrink. The average plot of land in Australian capital cities in the June quarter cost A$214,656 ($219,600), up 5 percent from a year ago, HIA data shows. The size has fallen 13 percent in Sydney to 525 square meters, 16 percent in Melbourne to 513 square meters, and 27 percent in Perth to 451 square meters from a peak about eight years ago.

New home sales fell 8 percent in the three months to Oct. 31, according to HIA. Sales of detached houses slumped 8.4 percent, while apartment sales declined 5.1 percent.
Rising Costs

Meanwhile, building costs are also rising. The price of building materials increased 2.1 percent in the three months ended Sept. 30 from a year earlier, and construction wages climbed 3.4 percent, according to statistics bureau data.

Australand is reconfiguring its homes as it downsizes them, replacing a third or fourth bedroom with smaller spaces that better suit a gym, media room or other use, said Rod Fehring, executive general manager of the Sydney-based company’s residential division.

“The number of households with one or two people in them has been rising, but we as an industry are still consistently designing three- and four-bedroom homes,” Fehring said. “Australand is moving away from the conventional definitions of bedrooms to activities that those spaces are used for, so they can have more flexible uses.”

More than three-quarters of Australian households had more bedrooms than were needed to accommodate the occupants, according to a statistics bureau report released Nov. 16.
World’s Costliest

Australian homes cost 6.1 times the gross annual median household income, compared with 3 times in the U.S. and 5.2 times in the U.K., according to a report by Belleville, Illinois-based consulting company Demographia.

The median price for houses and apartments across all regions in Australia was A$316,000 as of Oct. 31, according to RP Data. That compares with a median of $171,475 in the U.S., based on figures from property website Zillow.com.

At Perth-based Peet, which owns, syndicates and jointly develops it projects, the push for smaller homes has been driven by both increasing development costs and demand from buyers seeking smaller dwellings that are easier to maintain, Managing Director Brendan Gore said.

“This includes many people who now don’t want a large backyard which requires time-consuming maintenance, but would like landscaped parks and open spaces nearby,” Gore said.
Falling Prices

While Peet’s average lot size has dropped as much as 20 percent in some areas over the past three years, community amenities such as exercise areas or barbecue facilities have increased, he said.

As the market sours, landed properties are losing value faster than apartments. House prices in Australian capitals fell 4.7 percent in October compared with a year earlier, while apartment values slipped 1.7 percent, according to Brisbane- based RP Data.

“The trend will absolutely be toward more smaller lot houses,” said Tim Lawless, director of research at RP Data. “There is demand for it based on affordability pressures. Developers want to maximize their yields, and potential buyers want to max the bang for their buck.”

Sydney-based Monarch Investments has reduced the size of its homes to between 160 square meters and 170 square meters, from 250 square meters two years ago, Chief Executive Officer Peter Icklow said. It is splitting normal 460 square-meter lots in half on two of its current projects, and building homes with smaller rooms and only one-car garages, he said.

“I can see the size of houses going down to 130 square meters,” Icklow said. “It will keep going down until people can afford them. The Great Australian Dream isn’t gone; it’s just a smaller dream now.”

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-04/builders-shrink-great-australian-dream-as-housing-falters.html
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Black Panther
Default APF Avatar


As I predicted, to maintain affordability, they have simple shrunk house and lot sizes.

This trend is continuing ...

The bottom line is, the longer you wait to buy, the smaller the block and house for your dollar.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Queenslanders shift to smaller homes

By Sophie Elsworth
The Courier-Mail
December 06, 2011 1:00AM

MORE Queenslanders are downsizing to medium-density homes, new research shows. Figures from recent Census data and research by Bankwest found 38 per cent of home approvals in Queensland in the last 12 months were for medium-density dwellings. This is up from 32 per cent in 2006 and includes units, townhouses and semi-detached houses. Bankwest Retail chief executive Vittoria Shortt said Queenslanders were moving to a different style of living. "It's primarily due to affordability, access to services and a tight rental market," she said.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/money/property/shift-to-smaller-homes/story-e6frfmd0-1226214713510#ixzz1fi3SIeMR
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


Catwesasel say all a very positive. Maybe good now for Aussie mouse to shrink its belly and its wife; shrink its car; and shrink its stuff to fit it in smaller a house. Maybe it teach the new values to mouse that "big" not always a "best."

But can it shrink its reliance on master to do its think for it and create its safety? That the one that Catweasel be the very sceptic.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Black Panther
Default APF Avatar


Another reason why buying sooner rather than later makes sense.

I expect to see 2 x 1 on 150 m2 blocks to be the next development in new product formats to maintain an affordability entry point over 2012.

They will sell for the same as 3 x 2 on 300 m2 blocks are selling for today , as the new up cycle gathers pace in 2012.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Perthite
Member Avatar


New home approvals down 29.8% yoy ABS. Sounds like it saved the industry... Epic fail. Seems extremely unpopular.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Elastic
Member Avatar


Black Panther
6 Dec 2011, 12:16 PM
Another reason why buying sooner rather than later makes sense.

I expect to see 2 x 1 on 150 m2 blocks to be the next development in new product formats to maintain an affordability entry point over 2012.

They will sell for the same as 3 x 2 on 300 m2 blocks are selling for today , as the new up cycle gathers pace in 2012.
You're always good for a laugh BP.
Only a rat can win a rat race.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
The Great Aussie Dream is 'a thing of the past'

Courtney Trenwith
May 25, 2012 - 7:14AM

Perth's push for greater housing density is a "terrible mistake" and public transport will never solve congestion woes, a controversial American demographer has told some of WA's most prominent property developers and urban planners.

Wendell Cox called the "great Australian dream" of home ownership "a thing of the past" and claimed urban consolidation – a key strategy in the state government's plan to accommodate a doubling in Perth's population to 3.4 million by 2056 – raised house prices, caused greater traffic congestion, suppressed economic growth and was unnecessary for sustainability.

"I'm going to suggest some things you may never have heard before," he warned the Australian Property Industry at a conference yesterday.

Mr Cox said forcing more people to live in the same sized area would only increase traffic congestion.

"People think if you put people in these high rise buildings they'll start travelling by public transport," he mocked.

"Once you get six kilometres away from the CBD it doesn't matter if you live in [a high-rise apartment block] or a detached lot [you will still use a car].

"As you increase [housing] density, you increase traffic congestion."

Part of the problem was too much emphasis on the CBD.

Contrary to popular belief, less than 10 per cent of Perth metropolitan jobs were in the CBD, yet public transport centred on that minute fraction of the geographical area of the city, Mr Cox said.

Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/the-great-aussie-dream-is-a-thing-of-the-past-20120524-1z84a.html#ixzz1vq68IqE4
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Frank Castle
Member Avatar
Business As Usual

Alex Barton
25 May 2012, 12:07 PM
"Once you get six kilometres away from the CBD it doesn't matter if you live in [a high-rise apartment block] or a detached lot [you will still use a car].
Not true.
Several people in our street dont have a car and we are 14klm from the cbd
We managed to go for weeks at a time without using our car, it was borderline as to if it really was warranted cost wise vs cab when needed.
Ignore posts by The Whole Truth · View Post · End Ignoring
The forum fuckwit goes RRRAAARRRGGHHhhh - But not a fuck was given..................by anyone.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy