Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
The Climate Change Thread; New data shows global warming ended 16 years ago
Topic Started: 9 Nov 2011, 11:30 PM (35,244 Views)
Count du Monet
Member Avatar


Give Shadow a sock and put him on ignore.

Quote:
 
Hob - Small household spirit who can live in the house or outdoors in the farmyard. To get rid of a hob, one must give him a new set of clothing (ex: Dobby!)

Posted Image
The next trick of our glorious banks will be to charge us a fee for using net bank!!!
You are no longer customer, you are property!!!

Don't be SAUCY with me Bernaisse
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Aussiehouseprices
Member Avatar


Shadow
31 Oct 2012, 11:23 AM
The '97% consensus' figure is debunked below. This is the third time I've posted this... please read it this time!

Too long. I just wanted your thoughts on a percentage. A range is OK.
Aussie House Prices blog
Latest post: Real Estate 101 - Lecture 1: Never use the "F" word
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Shadow
Member Avatar
Evil Mouzealot Specufestor

Aussiehouseprices
31 Oct 2012, 12:04 PM
Too long. I just wanted your thoughts on a percentage. A range is OK.
I don't have a figure - the question is too vague. It's like asking what percentage of 'health experts' agree chips cause weight gain.

'97% of climate experts agree humans are causing global warming'

How do we define a 'climate change expert'?

Does 'causing' mean causing all of it, or causing a 'significant' amount of it, or causing 'some' of it?

Does global warming include global cooling? What about other aspects of climate change?
1. Epic Fail! Steve Keen's Bad Calls and Predictions.
2. Residential property loans regulated by NCCP Act. Banks can't margin call unless borrower defaults.
3. Housing is second highest taxed sector of Australian Economy. Renters subsidised by highly taxed homeowners.
4. Ongoing improvement in housing affordability. Australian household formation faster than population growth since 1960s.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Tyrion Lannister
Member Avatar


Shadow
31 Oct 2012, 10:27 AM
I'm really only making one point, and you agree with it - i.e. the climate has always been, and still is, influenced by natural forces.

Any impact of humans on climate change is unknown and can't be measured in isolation from the natural causes.
Hi Shadow, scientists can identify and measure the difference in carbon from human emissions and natural causes. This information is readily available and easy to find.
A Lannister always pays his debts.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


Ugh! Talk about a subject that generates more heat than light. So far we have seen some highly cherry-picked graphs with dodgy scales which use the same data to try to push quite opposite points of view.

I suggest that anyone who genuinely wants to inform themselves on the science read a textbook on the subject. Until you have done that, you have you have no chance of working out what is dross and what is not on the web. As far as I can tell, 100% of websites on the subject are severely slanted one way or the other.

I can highly recommend David Archer's "Global Warming: Understanding the Forecast". I read the first edition and was amazed to find out just how much the science is twisted in the press and on the web. You will struggle a bit with some of the chapters if you haven't done high-school Chemistry and Physics but it is done at about the lowest possible level required to actually understand what the science is really about.

As far as I can tell, the current level of debate starts with facts and then goes into conjecture.

1. The Earth's temperatures have been rising (with a couple of dips) for over 100 years - since direct measurements have been made. This is uncontroversial.

2. CO2 in the atmosphere has been rising at about 1ppm/yr since WWII and at a rate of about 2/3 of that going back to about 1880. This is uncontroversial. It is also uncontroversial that this is anthropogenic. Some people have argued that it is coming out of the sea, but that's bullshit. The oceans are a carbon sink, not a carbon source. Incidentally this in itself causes the problem of Ocean acidification.

3. The link between the two is extremely hard to prove definitively, but it is pretty uncontroversial that CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is linked to temperature. There are other things that affect temperature as well, and to what extent the warming is caused by C02 and what extent it is other factors is controversial and very key.

4. The trajectory of temperatures from here is very controversial in my view. The models are still very crude and there are mechanisms going on that nobody understands. The forecasts from scientists vary wildly.

5. What we should do about it is even more controversial.
(a) Go all-out to reduce CO2 emissions? (Aside: conversion of all Coal-fired power stations to 4th-gen nukes would cost about 1% of global GDP and reduce emissions by 35% at a stroke and take maybe 15 years. It *can* be done. Then converting transport to electricity-based fuel/batteries would do about another 30%. That could be done over 25 years at relatively minor cost and the only big emitter you'd have left is agriculture.)
(b) Adapt to climate change rather than try to stop it?
(c) Geo-engineering anyone?

This is the Global temperature anomaly chart with error bars from the and what looks like a 10-year moving average from the NOAA. It is interesting. The upward trend of temperature has at least paused. The last bar is 2012 and missing the final 3 months of the year, but it is seasonally adjusted.
Posted Image
Attached to this post:
Attachments: temp_anomaly.png (180.76 KB)
Edited by miw, 31 Oct 2012, 12:33 PM.
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
--Gloria Steinem
AREPS™
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Shadow
Member Avatar
Evil Mouzealot Specufestor

Tyrion Lannister
31 Oct 2012, 12:28 PM
Hi Shadow, scientists can identify and measure the difference in carbon from human emissions and natural causes. This information is readily available and easy to find.
That's irrelevant to the question. Yes, scientists can measure that humans are responsible for a tiny amount (around 5%) of CO2 emissions, but that doesn't answer the question of how much humans contribute to climate change. Climate change is not CO2 emission. Climate change is significant and lasting change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns.
Edited by Shadow, 31 Oct 2012, 12:49 PM.
1. Epic Fail! Steve Keen's Bad Calls and Predictions.
2. Residential property loans regulated by NCCP Act. Banks can't margin call unless borrower defaults.
3. Housing is second highest taxed sector of Australian Economy. Renters subsidised by highly taxed homeowners.
4. Ongoing improvement in housing affordability. Australian household formation faster than population growth since 1960s.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


Shadow
31 Oct 2012, 12:44 PM
That's irrelevant to the question. Yes, scientists can measure that humans are responsible for a tiny amount (around 5%) of CO2 emissions, but that doesn't answer the question of how much humans contribute to climate change. Climate change is not CO2 emission. Climate change is significant and lasting change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns.
Catweasel say no to an anti-science. How does it say a climate the change be the "significant"? What is its data set? Does it the understand what a "significant" mean? What is a "statistical distribute of weather pattern'? Can such it even a exist? Sound like mad ravings of mouzealot or somrthing it read in Herald Sun.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Simon
Member Avatar


Catweasel
31 Oct 2012, 01:40 PM
How does it say a climate the change be the "significant"? What is its data set? Does it the understand what a "significant" mean?
I think you just agreed with shadows position (was that your intent?)
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Andrew Judd
Default APF Avatar


Tyrion Lannister
31 Oct 2012, 09:06 AM
As I said to Andrew Judd above, the sciences exists with or without your understanding of it.
In the real world your ability to type arrogant statements does not change reality
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Catweasel
Member Avatar


Simon
31 Oct 2012, 01:45 PM
I think you just agreed with shadows position (was that your intent?)
Catweasel say it not a even clear if mouzealot understand what a significant the mean, particularly in a statistical the sense. It not a point whether Catweasel agree or the disagree with any of animal groups or sect.

It all about embrace of science and its unknown. Catweasel can frolic in unknown like dolphin in waves. Mouse and mouzealots absolutely petrified of a unknown. Such fears give master total control of its collective skulls.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy