My guess is that it was passed in, not sold, but negotiating with the highest bidder.
Hit the nail on the head .... passed in and was negotiating with highest bidder. But looks like it won't be able to reach an agreement today.
But the answer to the questions of the highest genuine bid (not vendor) was around $850k plus or minus $10k (deliberately being vague so I don't give away my exact address) So the winner is sentsie who guessed $800k+ :beer:
Still deciding what to do but at this stage, looks like we will pull the property from sale because we are not anxious to sell. Kids don't need their individual rooms yet at this age so we will delay building our dream home until the market picks up and we can sell this house for more.
The new house we bought is tenanted (tenant stayed on when we bought the house) so we have now become unwitting landlords and the "scum property investor"
after this (negative ?) experience, did you change your mind about how strong the market is , or still think its all rosy in sydney ?
I wouldn't call it a negative experience. I treat everything in life as a learning experience so when I had my first car accident, I became a more observant driver.
As for market strength, it certainly wasn't as strong as it was say last year but it far from completely quiet with no buyers out there. Bidding started at $800k and there were 3 people contending for the place (out of 5 registered bidders) so people with money are out there looking to buy but they weren't bidding as if "they were about to be priced out forever"
As an aside for those interested, the highest bid came from a couple who were buying their first home!
Kids don't need their individual rooms yet at this age so we will delay building our dream home until the market picks up and we can sell this house for more.
So Shadow... About that "babies create demand" that you were talking about... Does this mean that the "demand" is optional? Does this mean that the "demand" is not tangible or quantifiable so therefore just theory? Sorry mate but your argument is a loss. :banned:
My guess is that it was passed in, not sold, but negotiating with the highest bidder.
Hit the nail on the head .... passed in and was negotiating with highest bidder. But looks like it won't be able to reach an agreement today.
But the answer to the questions of the highest genuine bid (not vendor) was around $850k plus or minus $10k (deliberately being vague so I don't give away my exact address) So the winner is sentsie who guessed $800k+ :beer:
Still deciding what to do but at this stage, looks like we will pull the property from sale because we are not anxious to sell. Kids don't need their individual rooms yet at this age so we will delay building our dream home until the market picks up and we can sell this house for more.
The new house we bought is tenanted (tenant stayed on when we bought the house) so we have now become unwitting landlords and the "scum property investor"
Strangely I find myself agreeing somewhat with earsta. While I doubt the market will fall in any significant way, it may be better to accept the offer and bank the cash (or pay off debt). Sellers have to consider very carefully the opportunity cost in a flat market.
Hit the nail on the head .... passed in and was negotiating with highest bidder. But looks like it won't be able to reach an agreement today.
But the answer to the questions of the highest genuine bid (not vendor) was around $850k plus or minus $10k (deliberately being vague so I don't give away my exact address) So the winner is sentsie who guessed $800k+ :beer:
Still deciding what to do but at this stage, looks like we will pull the property from sale because we are not anxious to sell. Kids don't need their individual rooms yet at this age so we will delay building our dream home until the market picks up and we can sell this house for more.
The new house we bought is tenanted (tenant stayed on when we bought the house) so we have now become unwitting landlords and the "scum property investor"
entering a new global depression with two mortgages and falling market sounds very risky to me.
I think you should reconsider offers and let one more "generation" of greater fools to pick up at least half of the tab. .
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy