Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 9
Channel 9 The Block 2011: Purchase, Reserve & Sale Prices, Renovation Costs, Rental Yields; Block houses expected to lose half a million dollars each. All four cottages bought by investors.
Topic Started: 22 Aug 2011, 09:43 AM (26,549 Views)
oildrum
Member Avatar

Can anyone give a quick summary of the block prices (purchase, reno cost, reserve price and sale prices)?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mugshot
Member Avatar


The reserves and auction results were posted in the other thread here http://australianpropertyforum.com/topic/8185661


37 Cameron Street, Richmnond
Josh Densten and Jenna Whitehead
Vendor bid: $900,000
First bid from floor: $750,000
Final bid: $901,000
Reserve: $950,000
Result: Passed in

39 Cameron Street, Richmond
Polly Porter and Waz Jones
Vendor bid: $750,000
First bid from floor: $650,000
Final bid: $855,000
Reserve: $840,000
Result: Sold

41 Cameron Street, Richmond
Katrina Chambers and Amie Godde
First bid: $750,000
Final bid: $822,000
Reserve: $860,000
Result: Passed in

43 Cameron Street, Richmond
Tania and Rod Walsh
First bid: $750,000
Final bid: $832,000
Reserve: $850,000
Result: Passed in


For the ones that didn't sell, were those final bids the vendor bid (I didn't watch it)?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mugshot
Member Avatar


And from the same thread

Quote:
 
Watercress bought four Victorian and Edwardian terraces in a row after they passed in at auction in November for $2.85 million.

It also paid $198,000 stamp duty, taking the cost of each house to just under $950,000 before a porcelain tile or glass splashback had been put in place.

Does that mean ALL the vendors took a bath? Cost $950K each and they couldn't even sell them for $850K? Ouch!
Edited by mugshot, 22 Aug 2011, 09:52 AM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
apex
Default APF Avatar
Gold Member
Let me get this straight.

They spent $950K per house, another $100K on renos, pumped 2 months of their lives into doing the reno, and only one sold, for a $210K LOSS!

The others couldn't even be sold? Describing this as 'taking a bath' is putting it mildly. What a waste of money!

Bulls, is this a healthy property market???
Edited by apex, 22 Aug 2011, 09:58 AM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
carter
Member Avatar
Tasman Vagrant

apex
22 Aug 2011, 09:58 AM
Let me get this straight.

They spent $950K per house, another $100K on renos, pumped 2 months of their lives into doing the reno, and only one sold, for a $210K LOSS!

The others couldn't even be sold? Describing this as 'taking a bath' is putting it mildly. What a waste of money!

Bulls, is this a healthy property market???
I think it might be even worse than that. If you read the article in the thread linked above, it says this --

Quote:
 
A second storey has been added to three of the houses, all four were restumped, rewired, replumbed and re-roofed, and each has had $100,000 spent on it by the contestants.

Claiming the house he was auctioning had had $400,000 of renovation work done, one agent – who appeared to hit puberty mid-auction, judging by his croaky voice – said "this could be the successful buyer's Alan Bond moment". It was a reference to Kerry Packer's infamous line (after buying the Nine network back from Bond at a massive discount in 1987) that "you only get one Alan Bond in your lifetime and I've had mine".

It's not totally clear, but I think it's saying the $100K reno by each contestant is on top of the restumping, rewiring, replumbing and re-roofing. If that comes to $400K as suggested above, then each of these houses made a loss of half a million dollars.

That's a total loss of 2 million dollars across all four houses.

Monumental waste of both time and money.

Did anyone here watch the series? How much was actually spent on fixing up the homes in total?
Edited by carter, 22 Aug 2011, 10:07 AM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
BubbleTrouble
Default APF Avatar


Someone made a loss on property? In Australia? Are you absolutely sure, 'cause I'm pretty sure that's not supposed to happen? :D
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
themoops
Member Avatar
Ruby Member
Hahaha suck shit. :lol:
Edited by themoops, 22 Aug 2011, 10:19 AM.
stinkbug omosessuale


Frank Castle is a liar and a criminal. He will often deliberately take people out of context and use straw man arguments.
Frank finally and unintentionally gives it up and admits he got where he is, primarily via dumb luck!
See here
Property will be 50-70% off by 2016.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Black_Dragon
Member Avatar


They are about to throw me on 3Aw to discuss thisd
"No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...and if it occasionally gets a little heavier than what you had in mind, well...maybe chalk it off to forced conscious expansion: Tune in, freak out, get beaten."My Webpage
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Sunder
Default APF Avatar


carter
22 Aug 2011, 10:05 AM
That's a total loss of 2 million dollars across all four houses.
Not that Channel 9 would be complaining - that's a pretty cheap way to produce one of the most popular reality TV shows on at the moment ;)

I also figure that buying a house like that is like buying the Sef Gonzales house. Nobody would really want it, because of fear of gawkers, and bad karma afterwards.
Property speculation is a type of gambling... But everyone knows that in gambling, the house always wins in the end.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Black_Dragon
Member Avatar


Good numbers and comments here..after double checking, just rehashed these plus mentioned over stated clearance rates in Melbourne across prime time radio...lol
"No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...and if it occasionally gets a little heavier than what you had in mind, well...maybe chalk it off to forced conscious expansion: Tune in, freak out, get beaten."My Webpage
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 9



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy