Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
All things avocado (thread); Thinking of giving up the smashed avo and coffee to buy a house?
Topic Started: 1 Jun 2017, 01:06 AM (15,876 Views)
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Trollie
16 Jun 2017, 06:34 PM
Well, no they didn't get their property back.
They were like Shadow (and some other fool here who thinks his wife might know where his official proof of ownership documents are) who reckons he owns $6m in property but doesn't have the Certificates of Title.

WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Found your titles yet Shadow? :wak:
Trollie
16 Jun 2017, 02:49 PM
Look at the supposed security features - They've printed Certificate of Title on it and printed some fine lines :lol

Clearly these state of the art print outs are no match for Nigerian scammers.
Fukwyt investors such as yourself are no match.

Nor are the real estate agents who don't know what a real Certificate of Title looks like.

I'd pop along with my original Certificate of Title and would then own the business and PPOR of whatever retard sold my house.

Then I'd follow said retarded, and would letter box whatever suburb he turned up in to ply his useless trade in.

Imagine the fun you could have selling his place, but making it untraceable that you'd done do.


Edited by Ex BP Golly, 18 Jun 2017, 02:05 PM.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Trollie
Member Avatar


Ex BP Golly
18 Jun 2017, 01:53 PM
Found your titles yet Shadow? :wak:

Fukwyt investors such as yourself are no match.

Nor are the real estate agents who don't know what a real Certificate of Title looks like.

I'd pop along with my original Certificate of Title and would then own the business and PPOR of whatever retard sold my house.

Then I'd follow said retarded, and would letter box whatever suburb he turned up in to ply his useless trade in.

Imagine the fun you could have selling his place, but making it untraceable that you'd done do.

In all cases the scammed owners are unable to reclaim their stolen properties.

You've got no clue golly and your advice is dangerous.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Trollie
18 Jun 2017, 03:13 PM
In all cases the scammed owners are unable to reclaim their stolen properties.

You've got no clue golly and your advice is dangerous.
Again you dykhead- they clearly didn't hold their Certificate of Title.

WTF don't you get here?

I hold the Title, and under the system my title is indefeasible.

As long as I hold my title, if someone does something that effects that title, I have my land returned, and under a scheme run by the government, am compensated for any loss.

If I don't have the physical title, then I'm in all sorts of problems. I will be compensated, but may not get my property back. It will be a very long and painful process, because- no physical title.

As I said dude, do some basic research.
Edited by Ex BP Golly, 18 Jun 2017, 04:37 PM.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Trollie
Member Avatar


Ex BP Golly
18 Jun 2017, 04:17 PM
Again you dykhead- they clearly didn't hold their Certificate of Title.

WTF don't you get here?

I hold the Title, and under the system my title is indefeasible.

As long as I hold my title, if someone does something that effects that title, I have my land returned, and under a scheme run by the government, am compensated for any loss.

If I don't have the physical title, then I'm in all sorts of problems. I will be compensated, but may not get my property back. It will be a very long and painful process, because- no physical title.

As I said dude, do some basic research.
They DID get hold of their title you imbecile. All they needed was a few personal details and to forge a signature.

"The scammer's lawyers were able to get the victim's certificate of title "

The government isn't paying up a dime.

"The government accepts the woman is an innocent victim of fraud but disagrees that she is entitled to recover damages from the government."

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/canberra-property-scam-victim-sues-government-for-compensation-20160623-gpqhwp.html

Golly, you need to stop telling people this bullshit about holding the paper title being a silver bullet. It's simply wrong, people need multiple layers of security on ownership of their largest asset.

To date I'm yet to hear of any of he victims of these frauds getting their properties back or getting compensated.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Matthew
Default APF Avatar


Ex BP Golly
17 Jun 2017, 11:25 PM
They were like Shadow (and some other fool here who thinks his wife might know where his official proof of ownership documents are) who reckons he owns $6m in property but doesn't have the Certificates of Title.
I know precisely where my proof of ownership documents and original certificates of title are.

What amazes me is your abject immaturity and lack of understanding on the topic.
My only hope for my three boys is that they turn out nothing at all like Chris.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Trollie
18 Jun 2017, 05:09 PM
They DID get hold of their title you imbecile. All they needed was a few personal details and to forge a signature.

"The scammer's lawyers were able to get the victim's certificate of title "

The government isn't paying up a dime.

"The government accepts the woman is an innocent victim of fraud but disagrees that she is entitled to recover damages from the government."

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/canberra-property-scam-victim-sues-government-for-compensation-20160623-gpqhwp.html

Golly, you need to stop telling people this bullshit about holding the paper title being a silver bullet. It's simply wrong, people need multiple layers of security on ownership of their largest asset.

To date I'm yet to hear of any of he victims of these frauds getting their properties back or getting compensated.
W T F don't you understand?

She didn't have her Certificate of Title.

She also eventually got compensated, but without her CT, again, as I have said, she had a massive battle.

AGAIN, she didn't her her certificate of title.

Where is yours Trolley?
Trollie
18 Jun 2017, 05:09 PM
They DID get hold of their title you imbecile. All they needed was a few personal details and to forge a signature.

"The scammer's lawyers were able to get the victim's certificate of title "

The government isn't paying up a dime.

"The government accepts the woman is an innocent victim of fraud but disagrees that she is entitled to recover damages from the government."

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/canberra-property-scam-victim-sues-government-for-compensation-20160623-gpqhwp.html

Golly, you need to stop telling people this bullshit about holding the paper title being a silver bullet. It's simply wrong, people need multiple layers of security on ownership of their largest asset.

To date I'm yet to hear of any of he victims of these frauds getting their properties back or getting compensated.
"The government isn't paying a dime".

Do your research you loudmouth moron:

"Canberra woman wins $546,000 in damages after scammers sold house from under her
GEORGIA HITCH
MON 22 AUG 2016, 4:57 PM AEST

A woman who had her north Canberra house sold without her knowledge has been awarded more than $500,000 in damages by the ACT Supreme Court.

The woman was living in South Africa when her Macgregor house was sold by a fraudster without her knowledge at auction for just more than $400,000.

Court documents show the fraudster pretended to be the woman in emails to her real estate agent before authorising them to sell the house at auction in November 2013......"
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-22/canberra-woman-wins-damages-after-scammers-sold-house/7773434
Edited by Ex BP Golly, 18 Jun 2017, 09:48 PM.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Rat
Member Avatar
Filthy Rodent

A printout of a title won't protect you if the scammer steals it or creates a counterfeit.
Consumer protection laws extended to small businesses. Banks not permitted to repossess due to non-monetary defaults (for example, a fall in the property value).
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Trollie
Member Avatar


Ex BP Golly
18 Jun 2017, 08:58 PM
W T F don't you understand?

She didn't have her Certificate of Title.

She also eventually got compensated, but without her CT, again, as I have said, she had a massive battle.

AGAIN, she didn't her her certificate of title.

Where is yours Trolley?

"The government isn't paying a dime".

Do your research you loudmouth moron:

"Canberra woman wins $546,000 in damages after scammers sold house from under her
GEORGIA HITCH
MON 22 AUG 2016, 4:57 PM AEST

A woman who had her north Canberra house sold without her knowledge has been awarded more than $500,000 in damages by the ACT Supreme Court.

The woman was living in South Africa when her Macgregor house was sold by a fraudster without her knowledge at auction for just more than $400,000.

Court documents show the fraudster pretended to be the woman in emails to her real estate agent before authorising them to sell the house at auction in November 2013......"
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2016-08-22/canberra-woman-wins-damages-after-scammers-sold-house/7773434
I'm certainly glad she won some compensation for it, however my point stands that the government won't just pay up. CT meant nothing, it was never a question that she'd been scammed.

"To recoup her losses the woman took the ACT Government to court, but the Government argued the woman could have pushed legal action against the fraudster"

She had to take them to court and fight them for it. How much of a slice did the lawyers take you reckon?

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Rat
19 Jun 2017, 07:27 PM
A printout of a title won't protect you if the scammer steals it or creates a counterfeit.
You are absolutely correct. It doesn't matter how many of you're printouts you have, it won't help you.
Trollie
19 Jun 2017, 07:48 PM
I'm certainly glad she won some compensation for it, however my point stands that the government won't just pay up. CT meant nothing, it was never a question that she'd been scammed.

"To recoup her losses the woman took the ACT Government to court, but the Government argued the woman could have pushed legal action against the fraudster"

She had to take them to court and fight them for it. How much of a slice did the lawyers take you reckon?
No, you were wrong again.
You said the government didn't post out a dime.

You are always wrong.

Pull your finger out, and do some research.
Edited by Ex BP Golly, 19 Jun 2017, 09:58 PM.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy