Didn't say it was your research Roddy. I said you don't understand the research. You have no idea what it means or how the charts were constructed. You're lost.
"The truth is that there are no good men, or bad men. It is the deeds that have goodness or badness in them. There are good deeds, and bad deeds. Men are just men."
Didn't say it was your research Roddy. I said you don't understand the research. You have no idea what it means or how the charts were constructed. You're lost.
Just for your benefit MC, I will repeat what I said before you launched into your repertoire:
There is not enough information to understand how the benchmarks are constructed. Furthermore, these graphs are reproduced in the media and the comms graduates and journos are also unlikely to understand what they're looking at. You cannot expect the suburbanites to say anything: Most will also have no idea and are too afraid to ask.
Just for your benefit MC, I will repeat what I said before you launched into your repertoire:
There is not enough information to understand how the benchmarks are constructed. Furthermore, these graphs are reproduced in the media and the comms graduates and journos are also unlikely to understand what they're looking at. You cannot expect the suburbanites to say anything: Most will also have no idea and are too afraid to ask.
Creepy clown antics don't change that.
Roddy, waffling about clowns isn't going to change the fact that you don't understand the data.
You opened this thread by claiming that "Most people will have no idea what they're looking at".
But you yourself are one of those people!
You don't have a clue what any of it means. Why bother posting something that you lack the capacity to comprehend?
Here's why you did it...
You did it hoping nobody would challenge you, so you could act superior by pretending you're not one of the "most people" who have no idea what they're looking at.
But it backfired on you Roddy. As usual. You just ended up demonstrating your ignorance of basic statistics again.
"The truth is that there are no good men, or bad men. It is the deeds that have goodness or badness in them. There are good deeds, and bad deeds. Men are just men."
That's an interesting way to dodge my questions Roddy.
So, to summarise...
1. You don't know the mean 2. You don't know the variance 3. You don't know the standard deviation 4. You can't explain the movements in Z score 5. You can't explain why Sydney boomed for three years after your 'bubble meter' was last at this level in 2000
Thanks for confirming you don't understand the data Roddy. You have no idea what you're looking at.
If anyone else has posted that to you, you would have cried 'Abuse !!!!'...
still, since you clearly can dish it out...
That's an interesting way to dodge my questions about your previously posting using the account "Shadow"
So, to summarise...
1. You don't want to say if you ever posted under the account "Shadow" 2. You don't want to admit it 3. You don't know how to come clean with the truth of it 4. You can't explain the fact you would have been posting under two accounts 5. You can't explain why you are so afraid to answer the basic question.
Thanks for confirming you don't understand the truth. You have no idea how to be truthful.
Roddy, waffling about clowns isn't going to change the fact that you don't understand the data.
You opened this thread by claiming that "Most people will have no idea what they're looking at".
But you yourself are one of those people!
You don't have a clue what any of it means. Why bother posting something that you lack the capacity to comprehend?
Here's why you did it...
You did it hoping nobody would challenge you, so you could act superior by pretending you're not one of the "most people" who have no idea what they're looking at.
But it backfired on you Roddy. As usual. You just ended up demonstrating your ignorance of basic statistics again.
Well of course MC. I don't know what the Citi researchers have done. I can back into it, but I don't guess. That's the difference between science / analytics on one side and media dullards / mental passivity on the other. But the creepy clowns, who react with nonsense to protect their insecurities are a whole other phenomenon. Speaking nonsense doesn't help you MC. Your repertoires only really work with the emotionally vulnerable.
"The truth is that there are no good men, or bad men. It is the deeds that have goodness or badness in them. There are good deeds, and bad deeds. Men are just men."
If anyone else has posted that to you, you would have cried 'Abuse !!!!'...
still, since you clearly can dish it out...
That's an interesting way to dodge my questions about your previously posting using the account "Shadow"
So, to summarise...
1. You don't want to say if you ever posted under the account "Shadow" 2. You don't want to admit it 3. You don't know how to come clean with the truth of it 4. You can't explain the fact you would have been posting under two accounts 5. You can't explain why you are so afraid to answer the basic question.
Thanks for confirming you don't understand the truth. You have no idea how to be truthful.
Well it's all nonsense anyway. How can you know measures of tendency and distribution parameters without understanding what the data actually is? That is part of the whole issue.
But the creepy clowns, who react with nonsense to protect their insecurities are a whole other phenomenon. Speaking nonsense doesn't help you MC. Your repertoires only really work with the emotionally vulnerable.
Clowns and repertoires and stuff. That's great Roddy.
"The truth is that there are no good men, or bad men. It is the deeds that have goodness or badness in them. There are good deeds, and bad deeds. Men are just men."
"The truth is that there are no good men, or bad men. It is the deeds that have goodness or badness in them. There are good deeds, and bad deeds. Men are just men."
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy