Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
The "War on Cash" Thread; Can't Melt Away the Debt with Non-Existent Inflation? Just Confiscate Cash to Pay the Debt!
Topic Started: 19 Sep 2016, 10:14 AM (4,136 Views)
createdby
Default APF Avatar


Trollie
17 Nov 2016, 10:53 AM
Yes and our standard of living is many times better than it was 100 years, so only an idiot would want to go back to the old standard.
I would argue not much has changed and standard of living was just as good if not better a hundred years ago.

Electricity, home appliances, cars, even electric cars, were all invented and became widespread during the gold standard era.

There are recent innovatios in communications like the internet and pharmaceutical that are better today, but they nuked the major diseases like smallpox a hundred years ago.

The productivity was unparalleled with what was invented and mass produced a hundred years ago and we're still benefiting from what was invented. The difference between life before the gold standard and 100 years ago is night and day compared to 100 years ago and now.

Now you have people inventing shit apps like Instagram Snapchat (estimated to be worth 26 35 billion) for "productivity". That's all we have to show for in this era of financialisation.
Edited by createdby, 17 Nov 2016, 11:44 AM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
deluded
Default APF Avatar


createdby
17 Nov 2016, 10:48 AM
Don't want my cash to be NIRPd, ZIRPd, or bailed-in when the banks crash for starters. Am I criminal for desiring that?
So you're earning stacks of cash in the black economy? If so, that's against the law.

If not, then you're converting your electronic funds into cash and storing them in your mattress?

Can't you buy gold instead?
Real Trump News -- Real Climate Science News -- Real Democrat Party News
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Foxy
Member Avatar
Zero is coming...

createdby
17 Nov 2016, 10:48 AM
Don't want my cash to be NIRPd, ZIRPd, or bailed-in when the banks crash for starters. Am I criminal for desiring that?
Ok,
So please step back and look at your statement.

If paper money gets removed by the true owner and you can no longer use it??

Is that not a NERP or ZERP or bail in or what ever you fear???

Please remove a $10 Australian note from your wallet.

Look at it very carefully, does it have your name written on it anywhere??

Because as hard as I have looked I have never found my name on it.

It is the property of ?? Not me. and not you. true???

So when you say you are not a criminal I am sure you are right, I say you are simply ignorant as to your true position in this world.

You think you own the "money"

You do not my friend, you just get to hold it for a while, and if your are instructed to return it you will.

So boss how is your day???
http://www.afr.com/content/dam/images/g/n/2/1/u/8/image.imgtype.afrArticleInline.620x0.png/1456285515560.png
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Trollie
Member Avatar


createdby
17 Nov 2016, 11:34 AM
I would argue not much has changed and standard of living was just as good if not better a hundred years ago.
Well you would, you're one of the idiots i'm talking about.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
zaph
Default APF Avatar


createdby
17 Nov 2016, 11:34 AM
I would argue not much has changed and standard of living was just as good if not better a hundred years ago.

Electricity, home appliances, cars, even electric cars, were all invented and became widespread during the gold standard era.

There are recent innovatios in communications like the internet and pharmaceutical that are better today, but they nuked the major diseases like smallpox a hundred years ago.

The productivity was unparalleled with what was invented and mass produced a hundred years ago and we're still benefiting from what was invented. The difference between life before the gold standard and 100 years ago is night and day compared to 100 years ago and now.

Now you have people inventing shit apps like Instagram Snapchat (estimated to be worth 26 35 billion) for "productivity". That's all we have to show for in this era of financialisation.
I'm laughing, but I sense this post was not intended as humour.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
createdby
Default APF Avatar


zaph
17 Nov 2016, 01:35 PM
I'm laughing, but I sense this post was not intended as humour.
Families had it good in the 1900's.

With a single income, a man can feed his family while his home care taking woman would have the modern conveniences to maintain the family home like running water (1890's), vacuum cleaner and washing machine (1910's), refrigerator (1920's). Food was better as it was cooked by mummy who had all the hours in the day to prepare a decent meal.

In the modern era, both mummy and daddy have to slave away at their jobs to pay the rent or mortgage and pay for expensive daycare, where little Billy and Chloe can pick up all sorts of communicable diseases. No time to cook a decent meal. Thank god microwave was invented in the 1970s so little Billy and Chloe can eat their TV dinner.

For stressed out woman who prefer to cook meat and veggies for their little ones, a little bit of Xanax can ease the pain of spending 10 stressful hours in the office, 1 hour on the road moving to and fro home and work, another hour to pick up the kids from school and daycare, and 3 hours to please the husband's sexual needs and the little kids playtime and the home duties.
Edited by createdby, 17 Nov 2016, 10:05 PM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


Sounds fine by me - Do away wif all tha 'cashies' in tha economy - Where's tha problem?

Ya'd still get a bit of swoppin' some hooch for some pouch 'n wot not - But that'd not be too much No?
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Rufus
Member Avatar


createdby
17 Nov 2016, 10:00 PM
Families had it good in the 1900's.

With a single income, a man can feed his family while his home care taking woman would have the modern conveniences to maintain the family home like running water (1890's), vacuum cleaner and washing machine (1910's), refrigerator (1920's). Food was better as it was cooked by mummy who had all the hours in the day to prepare a decent meal.

In the modern era, both mummy and daddy have to slave away at their jobs to pay the rent or mortgage and pay for expensive daycare, where little Billy and Chloe can pick up all sorts of communicable diseases. No time to cook a decent meal. Thank god microwave was invented in the 1970s so little Billy and Chloe can eat their TV dinner.

For stressed out woman who prefer to cook meat and veggies for their little ones, a little bit of Xanax can ease the pain of spending 10 stressful hours in the office, 1 hour on the road moving to and fro home and work, another hour to pick up the kids from school and daycare, and 3 hours to please the husband's sexual needs and the little kids playtime and the home duties.
You are seriously misguided or incredibly poorly informed if you think that life was good for the average family in 1900.

Sure at the end of the 20th Century it was good but for the most part it was absolute crap.
Take risks - if you win you will become wealthy, if you lose you will become wise
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
createdby
Default APF Avatar


Rufus
17 Nov 2016, 10:34 PM
You are seriously misguided or incredibly poorly informed if you think that life was good for the average family in 1900.

Sure at the end of the 20th Century it was good but for the most part it was absolute crap.
Bullshit. Edwardian era Australia was just as good if not way better than the modern era. You're the one with the wrong notions.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Rufus
Member Avatar


createdby
17 Nov 2016, 10:44 PM
Bullshit. Edwardian era Australia was just as good if not way better than the modern era. You're the one with the wrong notions.
Give up the drugs.....
Take risks - if you win you will become wealthy, if you lose you will become wise
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy