2% is definitely wrong. It would be hard to get it any more wrong than that, unless you had said something like 'pineapple'.
Thank you for showing why you don't know why the answer is 2% and why you lack basic intuition that an analyst would need and a credible investor would know.
Thank you for showing why you don't know why the answer is 2% and why you lack basic intuition that an analyst would need and a credible investor would know.
The answer definitely isn't 2%. I suspect you've forgotten to include the Residex value.
The answer definitely isn't 2%. I suspect you've forgotten to include the Residex value.
Only a world of the smirky troll and those who don't know know how to deal with dispersion measures acrorss different data sets. In the world of data analytics, there is a strong argument to remove all data sets except for 1 based on a very simple risk management principle.
Only a world of the smirky troll and those who don't know know how to deal with dispersion measures acrorss different data sets. In the world of data analytics, there is a strong argument to remove all data sets except for 1 based on a very simple risk management principle.
It's no problem if you forgot to include Residex - just have another go and see if you can get a bit closer to the right answer this time
Only a world of the smirky troll and those who don't know know how to deal with dispersion measures acrorss different data sets. In the world of data analytics, there is a strong argument to remove all data sets except for 1 based on a very simple risk management principle.
Excuse me but I think your bias is showing. Maybe you should pop into a bathroom and adjust.
Yes, but most suburbanites would take the average across all data sets, which doesn't make any sense. And from a risk management perspective, it doesn't make ant sense either. Conceptually this is all quite simple and a basic principle of analysis and investing. I'm not sure you can base a sound investment philosophy on crude thinking like this, particularly when the stakes are so high.
Yes, but most suburbanites would take the average across all data sets, which doesn't make any sense. And from a risk management perspective, it doesn't make ant sense either. Conceptually this is all quite simple and a basic principle of analysis and investing. I'm not sure you can base a sound investment philosophy on crude thinking like this, particularly when the stakes are so high.
There are many ways of taking an average across data sets. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages. But you choose the one that appeals to your bias. I think that would be frowned upon among the academic community.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy