Peter stated in this thread that... "Governments never fund liabilities that are due well into the future, in fact they usually fund them as they fall due." "You do know that governments never fund future superannuation liabilities for the public service, in fact all superannuation funds work that way."
Peter stated in this thread that... "Governments never fund liabilities that are due well into the future, in fact they usually fund them as they fall due." "You do know that governments never fund future superannuation liabilities for the public service, in fact all superannuation funds work that way."
Try again, Pauk. Where did he state that the Future Fund "has noting [sic] to do with the PS Supers"?
Hmmm - Anyway ... The King is subject to the Law? Well Yes; But not really if 'He' has the ability to change the Law hey?
It really took off when Bob Carr came to power, but most recently occurred under our new (and I'm told incredibly good looking) Premier (Mike Baird) when he passed legislation confirming as legal, all the illegal decisions handed down by ICAC.
Instead of pulling his many wiggling fingers out and making ICAC do their job, he went the cheap lazy way.
This country really is very fucked when our 'leaders' behave like this.
stubby
21 Sep 2015, 11:12 AM
Try again, Pauk. Where did he state that the Future Fund "has noting [sic] to do with the PS Supers"?
This is what happens if you stand still when surrounded by socks Paulk.
He did, in more words than necessary say " the future fund isn't to pay for public servants retirement".
You honestly saying you didn't see Peter argue that?
Quote:
"Governments never fund liabilities that are due well into the future, in fact they usually fund them as they fall due." (Peter)
Quote:
"Ok, so you disagree with Peter as his view is the FF has noting to do with the PS Supers." (Pauk)
So Pauk's pseudo-quote is what passes for "paraphrasing" now, is it?
The "never" in Peter's *actual* quote is OTT in this context, but "usually" is quite correct, for OECD (and Australian) governments in the postwar era. So one can take the overall sentence either way, and I do think that Peter was guilty of being imprecise, as the sentence is contradictory in its two parts.
But I rather doubt Peter was actually unaware/mistaken about the nature of the Future Fund mandate. And Pauk has failed to come up with an actual statement of Peter's that demonstrates that he was.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy