Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 10
Who Benefits from High House Prices?
Topic Started: 24 Aug 2015, 06:52 PM (6,597 Views)
peter fraser
Member Avatar


Who Benefits from High House Prices?
By Martin North | August 24, 2015 | Economics and Banking
Link

Most would accept that house prices in the major Australian centres are too high. Whether you use a measure of price to income, loan value to income, or price to GDP; they are all above long term trends. Indeed, in Sydney and Melbourne, they are arguably more than 30% higher than they should be.

Ultra-low interest rates currently make large loans affordable for many households, yet overall household debt is as high as it has ever been and mortgage stress, even at these low interest rates is quite high. Banking regulators are concerned about systemic risks from overgenerous underwriting criteria and they have been lifting capital ratios to try to improve financial stability, with a focus on the fast growing investment sector. In many countries around the world, house prices are also high, so from New Zealand to UK, regulators are taking steps to try limit systemic risks. These rises are partly being driven by global movements of capital, ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing.

However, let’s think about who benefits from high and rising prices. First anyone who currently holds property (and that is two-thirds of all households in Australia) will like the on-paper capital gains. This flows through to becoming an important element in building future wealth. In addition, refinancing is up currently, and we see some households crystalising some of the on-paper gains for holidays, a new car or other purposes, stimulating retail activity. A recent RBA research paper, suggests that low-income households have a higher propensity to purchase a new vehicle following a rise in housing wealth than high-income households.

Those holding investment property also enjoy tax-concessions on interest and other costs; and on capital appreciation. Rising wealth generally supports the feel-good factor, and consumer confidence – though currently this is a bit wonky.

Higher values stimulates more transactions, which creates more momentum.

Now, the one-third of households who are not property active, consist of those renting and those living with family, friends or in other arrangements. Their confidence levels are lower and they are not gaining from rising house prices. A relatively small proportion of these are actively seeking to buy, and they are finding the gradient becoming ever more challenging, as saving for a deposit is becoming harder, lending criteria are tightening and income growth is slowing. We have noted previously that a rising number of first time buyers have switched directly to the investment sector to get into the market. Generally younger households are yet to get on the housing escalator, whilst older generations have clearly benefited from sustained house price growth. This has the potential to become a significant inter-generational issue.

But overall, the wealth effect of rising property is an umbrella which spreads widely. The sheer weight of numbers indicates that there are more winners than losers. No surprise then that many politicians will seek to bathe in the reflected glory of rising values, whilst paying lip-service to housing affordability issues.

There are other winners too. For states where property stamp-duty exists, the larger the transaction value and volume, the higher the income. For example, in NSW, in January and February nearly $1bn was added to coffers thanks to this tax and the state is well on track to achieve the $6.1 billion of stamp duty forecast in the 2014-15 budget papers. The higher the price the larger the income. The tax-take funds locally provided services so ultimately residents benefit.

The banks also benefit because rising house prices gives them the capacity to lend larger loans (which in turn allows house prices to run higher again). They have benefited from relatively benign capital requirements and funding, thus growing their balance sheet and shareholder returns. Whilst recent returns have been pretty impressive, future returns may be lower thanks to changes in capital ratios and especially if housing lending moderates. On the other hand, their appetite to lend to productive business and commercial sectors is tempered by higher risks and more demanding capital requirements. The relative priority of debt to housing as opposed to productive lending to business is an important issue and whilst higher house prices can flow through to real economic growth, it is mostly illusory.

Finally, building companies can benefit from land banks they hold, and development projects, despite high local authority charges. We also note that some banks are now winding back their willingness to lend to the construction industry (because of potentially rising risks). The real estate sector of course benefits, thanks to high transaction volumes and larger commissions. Mortgage brokers also enjoy volume and transaction related income. Even retailers with a focus on home furnishings and fittings are buoyant.

So standing back, almost everyone appears to benefit from higher prices. But is it really a free-kick? Well, for as long as the music continues to play, it almost is. The question becomes what happens if (or when) prices were to fall (remember that during the GFC, northern hemisphere prices fell in some places up to 40%, though since then prices in the US, Ireland and the UK have started to recover). Given our exposure to housing, there would be profound impacts on households, banks and the broader economy if values fell significantly.

But underlying all this, we have moved away from seeing housing as something which provides shelter and somewhere to live; to seeing it as just another investment asset class. This is probably an irreversible process, and part of the “financialisation” of society, given the perceived benefits to the economy and households, but we question whether the consequences are fully understood.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
WTF?
"Now, the one-third of households who are not property active, consist of those renting and those living with family, friends or in other arrangements. Their confidence levels are lower and they are not gaining from rising house prices."

then he concludes with...

"So standing back, almost everyone appears to benefit from higher prices."
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


ThePauk
24 Aug 2015, 06:57 PM
WTF?
"Now, the one-third of households who are not property active, consist of those renting and those living with family, friends or in other arrangements. Their confidence levels are lower and they are not gaining from rising house prices."

then he concludes with...

"So standing back, almost everyone appears to benefit from higher prices."
Maybe he's talking comparatively?

Like compared to alternatives like the US and Ireland and Spain where when prices fell, pretty much no-one benefitted.
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
goneaway
24 Aug 2015, 07:18 PM
Maybe he's talking comparatively?

Like compared to alternatives like the US and Ireland and Spain where when prices fell, pretty much no-one benefitted.
Nope, 70% is not almost everyone...
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


ThePauk
24 Aug 2015, 07:29 PM
Nope, 70% is not almost everyone...
Yes, I agree with that. 70% is not almost everyone.

But that's got eff all relevance to what I said.

Shaking head, shaking head, shaking head.

A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
goneaway
24 Aug 2015, 07:36 PM
Yes, I agree with that. 70% is not almost everyone.

But that's got eff all relevance to what I said.

Shaking head, shaking head, shaking head.
The author made no reference to OS conditions. On that, I think you are wrong to assume that.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
More like
Unregistered

1 multiple property owners
2 single property owners looking to downgrade, NOT UPGRADE
3 property developers
4 banks
5 real estate agents

This does not account for 2/3 of Australians
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


ThePauk
24 Aug 2015, 07:39 PM
The author made no reference to OS conditions. On that, I think you are wrong to assume that.
I didn't read the article. Just commented on the headline and your resulting comment. (With a "Maybe" at the front and a "?" at the end - Of the first sentence anyway. To be precise. Which I state in the hope it just could help you avoid misinterpreting anything else.)

But anyway, and so, I assumed nothing.

Despite you incorrectly assuming I assumed something it would seem.

Ass-Y-mations; ass-Y-mations; ass-Y-mations.

Oh well; Whatever; Blah blah ...
Edited by herbie, 24 Aug 2015, 07:59 PM.
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Car tart
Default APF Avatar


ThePauk
24 Aug 2015, 06:57 PM
WTF?
"Now, the one-third of households who are not property active, consist of those renting and those living with family, friends or in other arrangements. Their confidence levels are lower and they are not gaining from rising house prices."

then he concludes with...

"So standing back, almost everyone appears to benefit from higher prices."
As Douglas Adams said,

Essentially everyone became rich,
Everyone worth talking about.
You cant drive a house, BUT you can always sleep in a car!
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
peter fraser
Member Avatar


goneaway
24 Aug 2015, 07:36 PM
Yes, I agree with that. 70% is not almost everyone.

But that's got eff all relevance to what I said.

Shaking head, shaking head, shaking head.
Martin North is usually a bearish commentator, however he does compile some interesting data.

I think that he makes some good points. 70% is certainly a majority of people and if they are out there spending then there is a flow on effect for everyone. There is no benefit for most people when house prices are falling.

I thought that the other good point was when he said that house have now become commoditised and they probably won't ever return to just being places to live in. They have become an investment class.
Any expressed market opinion is my own and is not to be taken as financial advice
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 10



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy