And yet they need more deficit spending? What do they need to spend their way out of?
Deficit spending is the norm for all governments. They cannot sustain a budget surplus year after year unless banks are lending strongly. In other words the government would be running a surplus to cool down the economy, not for the sake of a surplus.
When politicians tell you they will return the budget to surplus and run a responsible government, they mean the opposite, because it doesn't work that way.
They have to speak like that because it's all voters understand. Go back and read DE's fable about the king who printed his own tokens.
Take risks - if you win you will become wealthy, if you lose you will become wise
Doesn't matter. Heaps of other things to do. Perhaps we shouldn't waste so much time and energy on mining and commodities.
Bullshit. There's nothing else for the Chinese population to do other than produce knick knacks. Either that or rebellions or a revolution.
This is why they need to devaluate badly. Not for their exports to become cheap or "competitive". They're already cheap and nobody's buying them anyway as they're very low in the value chain.
THEY NEED TO DEVALUE SO THEY CAN KEEP CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THEIR COUNTRY.
That's right. The biggest reason for them to devalue is to keep their slave labor competitive with other EM's slave labor.
This is the reason why top hedge funds are certain on a devaluation and putting big bets on it.
China takes on hedge fund bosses Ackman, Bass, Tepper in yuan battle Neelabh Chaturvedi 16 Hours Ago
As far as financial market duels go, China versus some of the world's most storied hedge funds is as big as it gets.
Money managers making bearish bets against the yuan, including top investors Kyle Bass, David Tepper and Bill Ackman, are pitted against Chinese policymakers who are trying to manage a more orderly decline of the currency, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported at the weekend.
According to the WSJ report, some of the traders are penciling in a decline in the yuan of as much as 40 percent.The currency has already fallen about 5.6 percent against the dollar since August, when a sharp devaluation by the People's Bank of China (PBOC) roiled markets, to trade at 6.5790 on Monday.
Which side wins control of the yuan's direction will have a profound impact on global financial markets as well as the well-being of countries that have benefited enormously from the frenetic growth in the Chinese economy.
The yuan has been hammered in recent months by a confluence of factors. China's once booming economy is now growing at its most feeble pace in a quarter of a century and capital outflows have accelerated. The PBOC is lowering borrowing costs just as the U.S. Federal Reserve has begun lifting interest rates.
And because the yuan, or renminbi as it's also known, is tethered to the greenback, it has gained against peers such as the Japanese yen, despite falling against the dollar itself.
Confidence in the ability of policymakers to handle the crisis has also wavered amid several policy missteps, helping create a toxic mix has emboldened investors to bet that the yuan is heading for a precipitous fall.
As far as financial market duels go, China versus some of the world's most storied hedge funds is as big as it gets.
Money managers making bearish bets against the yuan, including top investors Kyle Bass, David Tepper and Bill Ackman, are pitted against Chinese policymakers who are trying to manage a more orderly decline of the currency, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported at the weekend.
According to the WSJ report, some of the traders are penciling in a decline in the yuan of as much as 40 percent.The currency has already fallen about 5.6 percent against the dollar since August, when a sharp devaluation by the People's Bank of China (PBOC) roiled markets, to trade at 6.5790 on Monday.
Which side wins control of the yuan's direction will have a profound impact on global financial markets as well as the well-being of countries that have benefited enormously from the frenetic growth in the Chinese economy.
The yuan has been hammered in recent months by a confluence of factors. China's once booming economy is now growing at its most feeble pace in a quarter of a century and capital outflows have accelerated. The PBOC is lowering borrowing costs just as the U.S. Federal Reserve has begun lifting interest rates.
And because the yuan, or renminbi as it's also known, is tethered to the greenback, it has gained against peers such as the Japanese yen, despite falling against the dollar itself.
Confidence in the ability of policymakers to handle the crisis has also wavered amid several policy missteps, helping create a toxic mix has emboldened investors to bet that the yuan is heading for a precipitous fall.
"There has been a growing market belief that the yuan will weaken and in this respect there has been an increase in short yuan trades since the summer through the offshore market, options and non-deliverable forwards," Mitul Kotecha, head of Asian rates and currency research at Barclays, said.
"China has plenty of reserves but the significant fall in recent months at a time China was gradually guiding the yuan lower suggests the capital account is pretty leaky."
The PBOC has introduced a slew of measures to arrest the slide. It has asked banks making yuan loans abroad to set aside more in reserves and has also hoovered up yuan in Hong Kong, a key market where the bearish bets have been made, effectively making it more expensive for traders to borrow the yuan to make these trades.
China's state-owned publications have also chipped in with stinging editorials admonishing greedy speculators for betting against the currency. Prominent investor George Soros was recently likened to a "crocodile" that had declared "war" on China for suggesting the country's economy was heading for a hard landing.
The hefty interventions by the PBOC caught some hedge funds off guard.
Bill Ackman's Pershing Square said in a January 26 investor letter that the fund's had bought currency put options (contracts that give the investor the right, but not the obligation, to sell an asset a predetermined price in the future) in the hope of offsetting potential losses on its broader Chinese investments.
The options had not been as lucrative as hoped due to China's move to prop up the yuan, while the broader Chinese investments had lost more value than expected.
In the letter, high-profile activist investor Ackman called the Chinese central bank's peg protection "inadvisable," but said the fund would hold onto its trades.
China's efforts to defend currency have come at a cost though. China's foreign exchange reserves, the world's largest, fell by more than $500 billion last year to stand at $3.33 trillion at the end of 2015 as the central bank intervened aggressively.
"The $3 trillion mark is an important psychological level and if reserves fall below this mark, that would encourage the yuan bears," said Khoon Goh, currency strategist at ANZ.
Goh said further measures may be introduced to support the currency, including tighter rules on documentation, as well as new regulations that make it harder for companies to make foreign investments.
Additional capital restrictions could also be put in place, although that would represent a somewhat embarrassing reversal given the International Monetary Fund only added the yuan to its exclusive group of reserve currencies late last year because the yuan fit the requirement that it be "freely traded."
Strategists widely expect the yuan to weaken, though the pace at which the currency will fall is less clear. Kotecha at Barclays forecasts the dollar/yuan rate at 6.8 by mid-year and 6.9 by the end of 2016, while Goh said it was difficult to call a likely winner.
"What it all boils down to is who has more firepower and who is willing to hold out," Goh said.
Stupid fucking Chinese. They should see the world for what the world is: BOSSES
Start seeing Apple, for example, through their lens.
Apple: Hey Xi Jinping! I'm tired of paying $1* for someone to make an iPhone. I want to pay just 50 cents
*current exchange: $1 = 6 Yuan
Xi Jinping: I can't do that. We will lose face!
Apple: Well fuck you then!
Chinese worker: Xi Jinping, I need 6 Yuan to feed my family. Why don't you just devalue* so Apple pays me? We will revolt if you don't devalue and you will lose more face!
*If devalue: $1 = 12 Yuan
Xi Jinping: Ok
Tim Cook: Excellent* *After devalue: 50 cents = 6 Yuan
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy