BTW I notice you didn't really say exactly what it was that I said that upset you so much and why?
I posted:
Quote:
What about the Australian's that will never be born now because Australians need to compete for resources with these new arrivals and their offsprings and their offsprings offsprings? They'll never be in Australia now because we opened our doors. Like I said this celebration of the demise of your own lineage and ethnicity in your own country is a disease - 'I'm so open minded, non-racist and xenophilic i'll give away my country to prove it'.
Yep it was that quote that did it. It is an admission that you are happy to see a future Australia fat and lazy and non-competitive and isolated in a world where the best do well and the rest don't prosper.
You are the type who gives up because you're not good enough, and you want to drag everyone else who can compete down to your standards.
Not for me Leo, I'm happy to compete in the world.
What you're are not smart enough to realise is that your inability to see the other side of the argument has moved a number of fairly down the middle posters here to take a view against you more strongly that they would have without your input.
Every time you post Leo you strike a blow for the voices that are for multiculturalism, not against it as you think. I doubt that you will ever get that. So keep on posting.
Depends on your definition of multicultural. Multiculturalism is a slippery ideology. There is a myriad of variations to the concept. This wealth of definitions is an advantage to the supporters of multiculturalism making it easy to deflect any attacks upon their viewpoint, by swapping, merging, and confusing definitions, and therefore dodge valid arguments and avoid being pinned down.
It is to stretch a long bow to consider people of the same race and broadly speaking same ethnicity from the same geographical location with similar histories, mythologies, archetypes and religion and underneath the surface a great deal of affection for each other coming together to build a nation as multicultural. It would be like calling a community of Australians and New Zealanders multicultural.
The ructions between Irish and Scottish stem from -surprise, surprise -massive immigration from Irish into Scotland. No people like being swamped by others in their own land and will rightfully resist it. People historically understood the threats this posed to their own peoples continued existence. Not so anymore. Modern westerners are suffering from a PC mental illness that welcomes their own demise in their own countries and attack anyone who dares get in the road.
The "fair go" ethos and the Australian Labor party grew out of the shearers strike of 1891 and was originally an appeal to the wealthy to give the Australian worker a fair go. Ironic that today the Australian Labor party of international fabian socialists believe it is their purpose to give the whole world a fair go in Australia and the fair go ethos has been co-opted by the wealthy and multiculturalists to mean giving the whole world a fair shot at Australia. How mass immigration and multiculturalism benefit the Australian worker is yet to be explained.
So the long and the short is- that it is a myth created for the gullible to be fleeced by the rich, me old 'new chum'.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE! Share a cot with Milton?
Yep it was that quote that did it. It is an admission that you are happy to see a future Australia fat and lazy and non-competitive and isolated in a world where the best do well and the rest don't prosper.
You are the type who gives up because you're not good enough, and you want to drag everyone else who can compete down to your standards.
Not for me Leo, I'm happy to compete in the world.
What you're are not smart enough to realise is that your inability to see the other side of the argument has moved a number of fairly down the middle posters here to take a view against you more strongly that they would have without your input.
Every time you post Leo you strike a blow for the voices that are for multiculturalism, not against it as you think. I doubt that you will ever get that. So keep on posting.
I said "competition for resources". Resources are limited, water being the most obvious example, Australia being the driest continent on Earth. You are saying we must compete with foreigners and our offspring's with their offspring's and our offspring's offspring's with their offspring's offspring's e.t.c for our own limited resources in our own land or we are uncompetitive fat and lazy. You place competition above your own kith and kin and see this dog eat dog world view as a virtue. This is another manifestation of the mental illness currently infecting western nations and historically people had more sense of self preservation and common sense than this in their little finger.
There is a difference between competing in the world and inviting the world into your own country to compete for your own limited resources on your own shores. Australia has historically competed fairly well on the global stage, punching well above our weight in many areas of human endeavor and I would say this is in no small part due to our many natural advantages. Advantages that will be lost with the overpopulation that your dog eat dog world view will eventually lead to.
Quote:
Every time you post Leo you strike a blow for the voices that are for multiculturalism, not against it as you think. I doubt that you will ever get that. So keep on posting.
I call BS on this. I think herbs said I converted him to big Australia in our first ever conversation so he already thought that or didn't take much prompting to change his mind and you are a real estate leach who knows where his bread is buttered - population ponzi.
And BTW self preservation challenged drones like yourself have solidified my views as well as teaching me a lot about the PC mental illness that is destroying western civilisation.
A bit of a misrepresentation of my views. I have argued against mass immigration and multiculturalism. This is the first thread I have ever mentioned Muslims on this forum and my main criticism is their unwillingness to integrate. It is simply not feasible to be true and loyal Muslim, and live in a Western Nation. It is not possible for a Muslim to integrate into a society that offends their sensibilities at every turn. And multiculturalism gives them licence and even encourages them to remain seperate and apart from the mainstream life of this nation. Multicultural theory flies in the face of reality and history and maintains that it is possible for such wildly incompatible cultures to cohabitate. If their is a more nationally destructive idea than multiculturalism I haven't heard it. If their is anything more socially destructive than mass immigration I haven't seen it
BTW I notice you didn't really say exactly what it was that I said that upset you so much and why?
I posted:
To which you were moved to reply:
What was it about this particular post that set you off?
Muslim and Jewish religions share many of the things you say "offends their sensibilities"
You probably feel the same way about the Jewish religion hey? But you are too scared to say it out loud.
Isolating and denigrating people because of their religion is the same thing that occurred in Nazi Germany. You have just swapped the name of the religion.
Leodwald of Portsburgh
26 Dec 2014, 12:54 PM
And BTW self preservation challenged drones like yourself have solidified my views as well as teaching me a lot about the PC mental illness that is destroying western civilisation.
You have a straw man there Leo. You wont find many people on this very non-PC forum that agrees that people like you should be shut up.
In fact everyone has let you express your hatreds and your fears and have given their time to engage you in debate.
No-one has attempted to censor you by telling you that you are not PC, you should not resort to playing the victim.
Definition of a doom and gloomer from 1993 The last camp is made up of the doom-and-gloomers. Their slogan is "it's the end of the world as we know it". Right now they are convinced that debt is the evil responsible for all our economic woes and must be eliminated at all cost. Many doom-and-gloomers believe that unprecedented debt levels mean that we are on the precipice of a worse crisis than the Great Depression. The doom-and-gloomers hang on the latest series of negative economic data.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy