Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Superannuation: it’s the returns, stupid; Save $336 per month at a compound annual return of 18% and you end up with $28 million
Topic Started: 8 Sep 2014, 04:51 PM (642 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Super: it’s the returns, stupid

Alan Kohler

The only reason it might have been a good idea to increase super deductions from 9.5 per cent to 12 per cent is that super funds are doing a lousy job.

The current super guarantee should be more than enough to give everyone a very comfortable retirement indeed, and with no one on the pension -- at all.

The problem is not that employees aren’t contributing enough to their funds each month; the problem is that the funds aren’t doing enough with the money.

Super, or saving for retirement, is a game of long-term compound interest, which Albert Einstein is supposed to have called the most powerful force in the universe.

A young worker starting out now at 25 on a salary of $50,000 and having 9.5 per cent per month deducted for super, is saving $336.48 a month after contributions tax of 15 per cent.

The average super fund return over the ten years to 2013 was 6 per cent a year, according to APRA.

If that performance continued for 40 years, until our 25-year-old retired at 65, she or he would end up with $670,000, which by then would probably have to last another 40 years ‘til she or he died at 105.

It’s simply nowhere near enough, either for the retiree or for the government looking to get people off the aged pension.

Raise the contribution rate to 12 per cent of salary, or $425 per month, and the retirement sum from the average super fund becomes $846,000 -- still not enough to get off the pension or to live very well.

However, raise the compound annual return by 2.5 per cent, to 8.5 per cent, instead of increasing the contribution by the same percentage, and the retirement sum becomes $1.35 million -- double the original number.

The best performing fund over the past ten years, according to APRA, was the Goldman Sachs JB Were employees' fund -- 10.5 per cent per annum. If you use that figure over 40 years instead of the average fund return, the retirement sum becomes $2.48 million.

If you use -- and here’s the rub -- the actual 30-year annual compound return of the All Ordinaries Accumulation index, which is 11.34 per cent, you end up with $3.2 million. No pension for you, but lots of cruises.

Such is the power of compound interest. But wait, there’s more.

Super funds are basically funds of funds -- that is, they place the money with other funds that actually invest the money in assets, and then monitor their performance closely, month by month, quarter by quarter.

Outliers get the sack, which is why contractor funds try not to stray too far from each other or the index against which they’re being benchmarked.

The super funds, in turn, use balanced asset allocation strategies, scientifically calculated by expensive consultants, which is why they only averaged 6 per cent over the past ten years when the All Ordinaries Accumulation index over the same period returned 8.9 per cent.

Because of the stupidity known as asset allocation theory, super funds feel obliged to own assets other than shares, even though they know these are the best performing over the long term and would be best for their members.

In a way it’s fair enough because too much volatility in their returns would mean that some members might retire in the middle of a big downturn.

Anyway, let’s pick a listed investment company at random that only invests in shares and does not “hug” the index -- Wilson Asset Management.

Its annual performance since inception 15 years ago has been 18 per cent.

If our $50,000 a year worker saving 9.5 per cent of salary for 40 years were to get 18 per cent per annum return over 40 years, then the retirement lump sum would be $28.46 million.

I’ll just repeat that: save $336.48 per month at a compound annual return of 18 per cent and you end up with $28.46 million, which is 42 times what you get at 6 per cent compound.

But can you really expect to get that sort of return over a lifetime? Of course you can.

You just have to be a good investor like Geoff Wilson, or Alex Waislitz of Thorney, or Karl Siegling of Cadence Capital, to name just a few of many. They don’t trade stocks, or follow the index, or even try to time the market. They simply buy good companies and stick with them.

In fact for that matter you just had to buy CSL at the float and stick with it to get a 25 per cent compound return over 20 years (and for the record, 25 per cent compound over 40 years, saving $336.48 a month, produces a final sum of $321 million, that’s right, $321 million. It’s not a misprint).

Of course if every young worker got 25 per cent per annum compound over the next 40 years, Australia would become the richest country on earth. It’s not going to happen.

But what definitely should happen is that Australian workers get more than the 6 per cent compound, on average, from their super funds that they’re getting at the moment.

Yes, they had an excellent year last year, producing an average (balanced) return of 12.2 per cent, but only because the Australian stockmarket went up 19.4 per cent.

Just getting the long-term return to match the All Ords Accumulation index would mean super deductions would never have to be increased beyond 9.5 per cent and the aged pension would become entirely redundant, saving $39 billion a year.

That, surely, is a powerful enough incentive for the political debate to switch from focusing on the contributions to focusing on the miserable returns that Australia’s superannuation industry is producing in return for the its excessive fees.

Read more: http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/9/8/financial-markets/super-its-returns-stupid
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
hoofarted
Member Avatar


Quote:
 
Its annual performance since inception 15 years ago has been 18 per cent.


A few years ago I received a notice that I had LOST 17.8%. This had not only wiped out 3 years of growth but also left me with less than I put in. Just saying.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
miw
Member Avatar


hoofarted
8 Sep 2014, 05:25 PM
A few years ago I received a notice that I had LOST 17.8%. This had not only wiped out 3 years of growth but also left me with less than I put in. Just saying.
Yeah. I had much the same experience. But by now it has all come back and more. I think the key with super is not to be tempted to move stuff into the balanced fund or capital guaranteed fund or cash or any of the other guaranteed low-return classes unless perhaps you actually intend to withdraw as a lump sum in the next 5 years or so.

It is a long-term investment so you should force your fund to choose the asset classes with the best long-term performance and damn the volatility.
I'd say that if your fund never has a down year then you are in the wrong asset classes.
Edited by miw, 8 Sep 2014, 05:37 PM.
The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
--Gloria Steinem
AREPS™
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Count du Monet
Member Avatar


hoofarted
8 Sep 2014, 05:25 PM


A few years ago I received a notice that I had LOST 17.8%. This had not only wiped out 3 years of growth but also left me with less than I put in. Just saying.
Any system can only afford a minority of winners. There's already quite a few that have retired on some nice packets in their 50's. But it doesn't matter whether the system is public or private, it can't feed everybody caviar in their retirement. That's why I'm expecting monster inflation to crop up at some point, so every bodies retirement packages and savings can be inflated away.
The next trick of our glorious banks will be to charge us a fee for using net bank!!!
You are no longer customer, you are property!!!

Don't be SAUCY with me Bernaisse
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Will
Unregistered

Yes agree with "count the money"

There is no way that most Aussies are going to end with even 1 million in super (real terms).

The compound growth rates really aren't going to be able to exceed productivity growth over such an extended time line.

The only reason super has had 18 percent growth is that not many people have come to collect their money yet.
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Count du Monet
Member Avatar


Will
8 Sep 2014, 07:20 PM
Yes agree with "count the money"

There is no way that most Aussies are going to end with even 1 million in super (real terms).

The compound growth rates really aren't going to be able to exceed productivity growth over such an extended time line.

The only reason super has had 18 percent growth is that not many people have come to collect their money yet.
You mean, it has aspects of a ponzi scheme?
The next trick of our glorious banks will be to charge us a fee for using net bank!!!
You are no longer customer, you are property!!!

Don't be SAUCY with me Bernaisse
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy