Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
A house-price curse - superannuation system unable to provide for retirees; Australia is going to have to wake up to some unpleasant truths about the superannuation system
Topic Started: 2 Sep 2014, 05:32 PM (489 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
A house-price curse for retirees

Rob Burgess
29 Aug, 5:20 PM

Clive Palmer is onto something when he repeats, ad nauseum, the tale of the old ladies who visited his electorate office to complain they couldn’t afford their weekly movie ticket, coffee and chocolate cake any more.

They eat cake. They vote. And Palmer has declared many times that he didn’t get into politics to deprive old ladies of their cake.

Well two things need to happen. First, Palmer needs to show a bit more imagination and start telling a few other anecdotes before we all fall asleep.

Secondly, Australia is going to have to wake up to some unpleasant truths about the superannuation system and its inability to provide for a growing number of retirees

Today I wish to look at one aspect of the problem, through a graph showing good and bad news for retirees in approximately the lower quarter of the income scale – the very people to whom Keating’s scheme was supposed to deliver a more dignified retirement.

Remember that before the super guarantee was announced in 1991, a low-paid factory worker or similar would retire with a full government pension, and most likely little in the way of a company pension.

Typically, in those days, it was only big companies that had pension schemes, and many of them only offered membership to middle management and above.

But Keating rolled out a forced savings plan that rose to 9 per cent of income, and which will now be raised to 12 per cent over time. After the last election the Coalition delayed Labor’s increase schedule by two years to help balance the budget, but the long-term target remains the same.

But while 9 per cent of workers’ wages went into their super, something else happened just as the Keating government lost power – the cost of the most basic need of a working Australian, a home in which to live, began to escalate (the blue line in the chart below).

Against that pool of rapidly appreciating assets, Australians loaded up on debt as long-term interest rates became lower over time. Many withdrew a good deal of equity to buy cars, overseas holidays and the like.

Nonetheless, over 23 years of the super guarantee, the nation has built a huge pool of retirement savings that in aggregate looks great, but in the lower income groups is less impressive.

Despite years of forced saving, more than 60 per cent of retirees rely on the pension as their primary source of income -- that is, only 40 per cent have generated super pots big enough to earn them more.

But the real crunch for retirees is whether or not they have paid off their homes.

Australia has long been recognised as a country with a high rate of home ownership. However the last survey by the ABS of home ownership revealed that rate is falling. It notes: “The proportion of Australian households that own their own home with or without a mortgage has declined from 71 per cent in 1994-95 to 67 per cent in 2011-12.”

In the retired over-65 age group, it found that 72 per cent of lone persons and 82 per cent of couples owned their own homes outright.

The problem is, lower home-ownership rates across younger cohorts will reduce these rates too over time -- particularly given that house prices are continuing to defy expectations of a downward correction.

The question for the government, then, is what to do about a growing group of retirees who see their pension and meagre retirement savings chewed up by rent or mortgage repayments. The maximum single rate of rent assistance, at $63 per week, won’t help much.

The hard-hearted answer to that question might be “nothing”, but then many low income earners will have assumed that the super guarantee, with a pension, would look after them in retirement.

And so it might have done without that house price boom. Because while interest rates are at record lows, property investors can keep rents low. However, if rate rises arrive in 2015 as many expect, the negative-gearing formulas that investors use will start demand higher rents (whether the market will support them is another matter).

The good news for the 60 per cent of retirees whose primary income is the pension is that pensions have grown ahead of both CPI and average rents over past years.

However, the Abbott government announced in May that it would stop calculating pension increases as a fraction of full-time weekly earnings, and would instead index them to CPI.

In the chart above, then, the rent increases (the turquoise line) which currently track the wage-linked pension increases (the green line for couples), will keep rising when the increase in pensions flattens to the CPI rate of increase.

In short, if you’re one of the 72 per cent of single retirees who has paid off their homes, or 82 per cent of couples, you’re fine.

If you’re one of the others, in a market of rising rents, and rising mortgage rates, there will not be much Clive Palmer or anyone else can do to ensure you get your weekly slice of cake.

Read more: http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/29/property/house-price-curse-retirees
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


"... many low income earners will have assumed that the super guarantee, with a pension, would look after them in retirement ..."

Why would anyone have assumed that? When the industry has been screaming for years (decades even) "You won't have enough!" (Albeit for their own selfish reasons.)

But then again, I seem to recall Jessica Irvine (who even went to some sort of Economists' school I gather?) assuming that as she's had super pretty much all her working life, she'll be just fine.

Some famous last words as to why IT'S NOT MY FAULT: "I assumed ..." - Or as a cynic might say: "I Ass U Me'd"
Edited by herbie, 2 Sep 2014, 09:11 PM.
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy