Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
RBA Minutes of the Monetary Policy Meeting of the Reserve Bank Board August 2014; Most prudent course likely to be a period of stability in interest rates
Topic Started: 19 Aug 2014, 03:26 PM (515 Views)
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
Minutes of the Monetary Policy Meeting of the Reserve Bank Board, Sydney - 5 August 2014

International Economic Conditions

Members began their discussion by noting that growth in Australia's major trading partners was expected to be a bit above its long-run average pace in both 2014 and 2015, even though growth appeared to have eased in the June quarter. That slowing largely reflected a contraction in Japan's output after the consumption tax increase in April, partly offset by stronger growth in China and the United States.

In China, GDP growth in the June quarter was consistent with the authorities' target for growth of 7.5 per cent in 2014 as a whole. The recent improvement in growth was driven by a rebound in exports and a pick-up in investment growth, which partly reflected the effect of modest stimulus measures. Conditions in Chinese residential property markets had weakened further, particularly in the larger cities, as many local government restrictions on property transactions implemented prior to 2014 remained in place.

In Japan, temporary fiscal stimulus measures had been introduced to counter the contractionary effects of the consumption tax increase, but the underlying pace of growth remained uncertain. Members observed that labour market conditions had tightened considerably over the past year, although wages growth had remained modest. Growth in the rest of east Asia appeared to have slowed over the first half of 2014 from the strong pace recorded in late 2013. Monetary policies in the region generally remained expansionary, but had been tightened a little in some countries, partly in response to a modest pick-up in core inflation.

The US economy grew strongly in the June quarter after adverse weather had contributed to weakness earlier in the year. Investment was stronger in the June quarter and consumption growth had picked up to around the pace seen through 2013. The labour market continued to strengthen and inflation had picked up a little over recent months, while the pace of recovery in the housing market had slowed.

Members noted that the gradual recovery of economic activity in the euro area appeared to be continuing, although unemployment remained high and inflation was well below the target set by the European Central Bank (ECB).

Prices for bulk commodities had declined over recent months, much of which owed to an increase in the supply of these commodities from lower-cost mines.

Domestic Economic Conditions

Members noted that the inflation outcome for the June quarter had been a little higher than expected. Underlying inflation was around ¾ per cent in the quarter and 2¾ per cent over the year, while year-ended CPI inflation was a little higher, at 3 per cent. Much of the increase in CPI inflation over the past year reflected a pick-up in tradables inflation, which was consistent with pass-through of the earlier depreciation of the exchange rate. This was comparable to that in previous episodes. Prices of consumer durables had declined less rapidly over the past year than in recent years, which was consistent with the effects of the earlier depreciation of the exchange rate.

Non-tradables inflation had remained subdued at just over 3 per cent, its slowest pace in over a decade. The decline in non-tradables inflation since 2013 was most evident in lower growth of prices for market services. This was consistent with the slowing in growth of labour costs, which reflected both lower wages growth and higher productivity growth. Meanwhile, inflation in the cost of new dwellings had increased over the past 18 months or so, reflecting increased demand for residential construction. The prices of ‘administered’ items – those with regulated prices or for which the public sector is a significant provider – had also continued to increase at well above the pace of the overall CPI. Members discussed some of the forces underpinning the relatively strong growth in these prices.

A number of labour market indicators had improved a little since the beginning of 2014. Employment growth had broadly matched population growth and the unemployment and participation rates both remained steady in trend terms. Forward-looking indicators of labour demand had generally improved, but pointed to only modest employment growth in the near term. A notable degree of spare capacity in the labour market was suggested by the relatively high unemployment rate and the participation rate being close to its lowest rate in almost a decade.

Turning to household consumption, members noted that the volume of retail sales declined in the June quarter, in part reflecting the unusually warm weather at the start of winter. There had been a marked decline in consumer sentiment since earlier in the year, although a more timely weekly measure of sentiment had rebounded to be at above-average levels in recent weeks.

Members observed that residential dwelling approvals had declined somewhat in recent months, but remained at a high level and, in combination with the substantial amount of residential work yet to be done, suggested that dwelling investment was likely to remain strong in the period ahead. Conditions in the established housing market also remained strong and while house price inflation across the country in 2014 had not been as rapid as over the second half of 2013, it had remained robust. Auction clearance rates in Sydney had eased from their high levels in late 2013, although they had increased in Melbourne more recently. Factors influencing the demand for and supply of housing at present were also noted.

Measures of business conditions had remained at around average levels. Survey measures of investment intentions had also been around average, after picking up from the lower levels seen in 2013. Members noted that information from liaison continued to indicate that firms were reluctant to undertake significant investment projects until they experienced a sustained period of strong demand. While non-residential building approvals had declined in trend terms since early 2014, the stock of work yet to be done was expected to support the current level of non-residential construction in coming quarters.

The volume of exports was estimated to have declined in the June quarter, after increasing strongly in the preceding quarter as a result of strong growth in resource exports. The growth of iron ore and coal exports had been expected to moderate from the rapid pace seen in recent years, as capacity was forecast to expand at a slower rate over coming quarters. While construction of large projects to expand LNG capacity was proceeding, production was not expected to begin increasing noticeably until 2015.

Members noted that staff forecasts for domestic GDP growth were not materially different from those presented three months earlier. Growth was expected to be below average over 2014/15 before increasing to an above-average pace by 2016. Growth in non-mining activity had been expected to increase a little further, having already picked up over the past year, partly as a result of the support provided by the very low level of interest rates. Resource exports were forecast to add substantially to growth over the next few years. However, mining investment was expected to decline more rapidly than it had to date, and ongoing fiscal consolidation and the effects of the still high level of the exchange rate were expected to restrain growth. Members considered the implications for the forecasts of the usual assumptions that the cash rate and the exchange rate remained at their current levels and noted that the no-change assumption for the cash rate was consistent with market expectations over the near term. Members also noted the significant uncertainties around the growth forecast and the importance of considering the risks to the forecast as well as the central projection.

Overall, underlying inflation was expected to be consistent with the target over the forecast period. Domestic inflationary pressures were likely to remain subdued, reflecting spare capacity in labour and product markets. Working in the other direction, the decline in the exchange rate since early 2013 had pushed up import prices and these higher prices ‘across the docks’ were being passed through to prices facing consumers. The recent abolition of the carbon price would push inflation lower in 2014/15 than earlier assumed.

Financial Markets

Members observed that conditions in financial markets continued to be characterised by low volatility, notwithstanding the heightened geopolitical tensions in Ukraine and Gaza, as well as the ongoing uncertainty about the timing of the first increase in the federal funds rate in the United States. Volatility in foreign exchange markets remained particularly low, and it was only in mid July that the S&P 500 index for the United States ended the longest period of daily movements of less than 1 per cent in nearly two decades.

As expected, the Federal Reserve reduced its asset purchases to US$25 billion a month at its July meeting and reiterated its intention to reduce them by a further US$10 billion at its September meeting. Members noted that the Fed's plan is to end these purchases altogether in October, as long as the economy progresses as expected, and that markets expect the first rise in the federal funds rate will take place in mid 2015. Over the past month, the ECB released further details on its targeted long-term refinancing operations announced in June. In addition, it announced that from 2015 the frequency of monetary policy meetings will change from a monthly to a six-week cycle and the ECB will start publishing the minutes of its monetary policy meetings.

Members noted that yields on long-term US government bonds were unchanged over July, while Australian bond yields had declined in response to domestic developments, with the 10-year spread between the two bonds reaching its lowest level since 2006. Yields on 10-year German Bunds moved lower over the past month – reaching an all-time low of 1.12 per cent – while spreads between yields on Portuguese government bonds and Bunds had widened because of the difficulties experienced by Banco Espírito Santo, Portugal's largest bank by total assets.

Developments in many emerging market sovereign bond markets had been uneventful over the past month. However, yields had moved significantly higher in Russia, as sanctions were imposed, as well as in Argentina, which had defaulted on its restructured debt after a New York court ruled that it could not make payments unless it also paid ‘holdout’ creditors that had refused to accept the restructuring of bonds after the 2001 default.

Equity prices in the major markets had generally been little changed over the past month, with ongoing low volatility, although share price indices in the US markets had reached another high in late July before falling back subsequently. The Australian market had also reached its highest level since 2008 in July, driven in particular by rises in share prices of the large resource companies.

Members noted that large legal settlements with banks in the United States and some significant fines in the United Kingdom had brought the total value of fines imposed on major US and European banks thus far in 2014 to more than US$35 billion.

Conditions in foreign exchange markets continued to be quiet over the past month, with little change in major exchange rates in July and volatility remaining around historic lows. The US dollar recorded a modest appreciation while the euro depreciated by 2 per cent on a trade-weighted basis. The Australian dollar also depreciated slightly against the US dollar and on a trade-weighted basis over the past month, although it remained well above its level in late January notwithstanding lower commodity prices and a narrowing in interest rate differentials between Australia and most other advanced economies since then.

Members noted that Australian banks had issued new bonds at around the same level as maturities, resulting in little net issuance in recent months. Secondary market spreads of the major banks' senior unsecured bonds to Commonwealth Government Securities had remained at their lowest levels since 2007, which was gradually reducing the banks' average cost of financing as more expensive bonds matured. The low cost of wholesale financing, combined with an easing in competition in the deposit market, had contributed to a decline in banks' deposit rates in recent months.

Average lending rates on housing and business loans in Australia continued to edge down over July, mainly owing to the ongoing replacement of more expensive fixed-rate and discount variable-rate loans from previous years. Overall, cumulative movements in interest rates since the start of the year amounted to a noticeable easing in financial conditions. Financial markets continued to expect the Bank to leave the cash rate target unchanged at the August meeting and over the year ahead.

Considerations for Monetary Policy

Growth in Australia's major trading partners was expected to be a little above average in both 2014 and 2015. Commodity prices remained high, although iron ore and coal prices had declined following a substantial increase in the supply of these commodities. Global financial conditions were accommodative, with long-term interest rates and risk spreads remaining at low levels and volatility in financial prices declining further.

Domestically, GDP growth had been above average in the March quarter because of strong growth in resource exports and a pick-up in non-mining activity. On current indications, resource exports appeared to have been little changed in the June quarter and mining investment continued to fall. Public spending was scheduled to be subdued and the pace of consumption was likely to have remained around the moderate pace recorded in the March quarter. Meanwhile, the recovery in dwelling investment had gathered pace and conditions in the established housing market remained strong. Indicators of investment intentions in the non-mining sector were showing signs of improvement since the latter part of 2013, although liaison suggested that businesses were reluctant to commit to major new investment projects until they perceived a sustained pick-up in demand. Overall, GDP growth was likely to have slowed to a more moderate pace in the June quarter and was expected to be below trend over 2014/15, before picking up thereafter.

While there had been some modest improvement in indicators of labour demand over the course of the year to date, it was likely to be some time before unemployment declined consistently. This suggested that wage growth was likely to remain subdued, which should keep inflation consistent with the target in the medium term. Factors that had led inflation to be higher than expected over the past year, including the extent of pass-through to prices of the earlier depreciation of the exchange rate, were expected to ease over the forecast period.

Members noted that the current setting of monetary policy in Australia remained accommodative and supportive of demand. Credit growth had picked up a little and dwelling prices had continued to increase, albeit at a slower pace than was the case a year earlier. Interest rates were very low and had declined a little further since the last reduction in the cash rate. On the other hand, the exchange rate remained high by historical standards, particularly given the notable decline in the prices of some key commodities, and hence was offering less assistance than it might in achieving balanced growth in the economy.

Staff forecasts suggested that inflation, despite recent higher readings, was likely to be consistent with the 2–3 per cent target over the next two years. Output growth would probably be somewhat softer in the near term after recent higher readings, but was expected gradually to strengthen again over the forecast period. Members noted that there was inevitably a significant degree of uncertainty about the outlook, given the number of forces working in different directions. The Board judged that monetary policy was appropriately configured and that, on present indications, the most prudent course was likely to be a period of stability in interest rates.

The Decision

The Board decided to leave the cash rate unchanged at 2.5 per cent.

Read more: http://www.rba.gov.au/monetary-policy/rba-board-minutes/2014/05082014.html
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
The RBA is stuck in policy limbo

Callam Pickering

The Reserve Bank of Australia continues to take a neutral stance on policy but by acknowledging that there is “a significant degree of uncertainty about the outlook”, it is clear that our central bank has a lot to think about over the remainder of the year.

The RBA monthly board minutes are often a mixed bag. They occasionally provide additional insight into the central bank’s thinking but, more often than not, they communicate a dated view of the economy.

The minutes this month were mostly of the latter variety. The big shift compared with the board statement was the acknowledgement of considerable uncertainty facing the domestic outlook. But that view was discussed in depth in the RBA’s Statement on Monetary Policy.

As I noted earlier this month, the RBA has downgraded its outlook by 0.25 percentage points over the year to June 2015 and June 2016 (The big question mark hanging over the RBA’s outlook, August 8). This follows a similar downgrade at the May SMP.

Low interest rates continue to support activity, with residential construction set to rise strongly over the next couple of years. The household sector improved over 2013 but has faltered more recently, with retail trade volumes declining in the June quarter.

Bank lending remains elevated, resulting in strong house price growth “albeit at a slower pace than was the case a year earlier”. Fixed mortgage rates have eased somewhat in recent months, despite no move in the official cash rate. Meanwhile, refinancing and deleveraging remains in vogue for a number of businesses.

The biggest piece of new information since the RBA board meeting was a fairly nasty set of labour data. The unemployment rate rose to 6.4 per cent in July and, although it might be a rogue outcome, the broader set of data suggests that the labour market has softened further (Disastrous jobs data will create more work for the RBA, August 7).

The near to medium-term outlook for employment remains subdued. ANZ and NAB recently estimated that the resource sector could cut between 75,000 and 100,000 jobs over the next couple of years. More importantly, the broader economy may struggle to absorb this excess supply of workers as many will share similar skill-sets and experience.

This is particularly concerning since our economy is already struggling to absorb current population growth. Recent estimates from the Department of Employment based on the 2014-15 budget suggest that job growth will be outstripped by population growth over the next five years (Abbott must abandon his misguided war on the young and poor, August 18).

Employment in non-mining construction will pick up, as will jobs in health and aged-care services, but will that be enough to return the economy to full-employment?

Inflationary pressures appear to have peaked at an annual rate of 3 per cent and will begin to ease on the back of poor wage growth, the end of the carbon tax and a stubbornly high Australian dollar. The RBA said that “inflation, despite recent higher readings, was likely to be consistent with the 2 – 3 per cent target over the next couple of years”.

The biggest immediate challenge for the Australian economy remains the collapse in mining investment; it is also the area creating considerable uncertainty for the economic outlook.

The RBA noted in the August SMP that ‘there is no guarantee that the rebalancing of spending will be a smooth process”, and that it may prove highly disruptive to the Australian economy, resulting in either “excess demand for, or supply of, particular labour skills or types of capital”.

While mining investment still has a long way to fall, “it is unclear by just how much, and how quickly this will occur”. That largely sums up the RBA’s predicament: how do you set policy to deal with a shock that is certain to arrive but nevertheless involves considerable uncertainty?

To a large extent a person’s view on that issue will dictate how it sees the cash rate evolving over the next couple of years.

Based on current evidence, mining investment should decline by at least 4 to 5 percentage points as a share of nominal GDP. But that estimate may be on the conservative side, with mounting evidence that the resource sector over-invested during the boom, which could result in mining investment falling below its long-run average (Prepare for more Australian miners to crumble, August 11).

If that scenario eventuates, then the RBA will be left with little choice but to cut rates further. But for now it appears happy to leave rates unchanged and wait for new information to provide greater certainty.

That could arrive as soon as next week, with the ABS releasing new estimates for capital expenditure for 2014-15. These figures will provide a better indication of investment intentions for both the mining and non-mining sectors and could fundamentally change the way the RBA views the domestic economy, for better or for worse.

Read more: http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/19/australian-news/rba-stuck-policy-limbo
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator

Quote:
 
The government is failing at the limits of monetary policy

August 20, 2014 - 12:33PM
Michael Pascoe

Here’s what the Reserve Bank has effectively told us: given the balancing act of stimulating the economy with low interest rates on one hand while keeping some ammunition dry and not sparking dangerous bubbles on the other, unemployment stuck around 6.25 per cent for the next couple of years is acceptable.

Governor Stevens told the House of Representatives economics committee the economic growth outlook for the next couple of years is a little weaker in the near term than he would like, but it’s still “kind of OK”.

It follows that unemployment around 6.25 per cent is also “kind of OK”. Stevens is a decent person and certainly wouldn’t like the 6.25 per cent, wouldn’t wish its implications on his fellow citizens, but in terms of what he can and can’t responsibly do with the cash rate, it’s not unacceptable.

So barring major economic shocks of one kind or another, monetary policy isn’t moving. It’s reached its non-crisis limits. (You really shouldn’t wish for lower rates now as that would only happen if the economy substantially worsens.)

Which should leave us wondering what could/should be done on the fiscal side, whether that federal government also thinks unemployment somewhere in the mid-6s is “kind of OK”.

It turns out that the RBA deputy governor has an answer that can’t be found in the incoherent remains of Joe Hockey’s first budget.

The Senate circus means there’s not an immediate fiscal contraction and, on a short-term basis, that’s kind of OK.

Despite all the rhetoric, the coalition’s occupation of the treasury benches has meant increased spending and reduced taxes for the last and present financial years. The supposedly evil debt has been increased by policy and accident. (I think it’s fair to call the Senate an accident.)

Unfortunately, the spending has been without structure, adding nothing to the preconditions for a better Australia and precious little to business investment confidence.

Even the chanted core promise of scrapping the carbon price looks like amounting to nothing with business expecting it to be revived, while the uncertainty over renewables policy is actively killing investment. There’s plenty of doubt about the economics of much of the self-promoting renewables industry, but years of policy uncertainty won’t help.

And then there’s the big fib about an area where the federal government really could help the nation: the “Infrastructure Prime Minister”.

The budget papers show less money is being spent on transport and communications this financial than last. According to the Grattan Institute, commonwealth spending on all transport forms, even the touted roads, will fall in real terms over the forward estimates.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/the-government-is-failing-at-the-limits-of-monetary-policy-20140820-1065y5.html
Follow OzPropertyForum on Twitter | Like APF on Facebook | Circle APF on Google+
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Lou Ellen
Unregistered

It’s a structural issue but it’s not confidence, for heaven’s sake, it’s competitiveness. If you can’t compete what have you got to be confident about? We are not risk averse. We are being herded into the wrong risks – unproductive assets – in part by the RBA, and that risk-taking is killing our competitiveness. It’s not bloody rocket science!

What Stevens and Lowe should have said was:

Australia’s principle economic adjustment is to restore the real exchange rate to levels where import competing and export business can resume investing

monetary policy can have a limited effect on this challenge, especially in the context of a global currency war that artificially props up the dollar

we announce today in tandem with APRA, that Australia will launch new macroprudential tools aimed at cooling the housing market. When that end has been achieved interest rate will be cut further to lower the currency versus all major competitors

while the RBA can make this contribution to growth, it beseeches the Government to also:

begin an aggressive reform campaign aimed at raising productivity, including implementation of the Henry Tax Review

immediately pass all proposed infrastructure spending to the Productivity Commission for modelling and assessment

launch a mini-Budget that restores fiscal credibility within a framework of shared and equal sacrifice of middle class entitlements

undertake major supply side reform for housing supply at all levels of government.

That is what is needed. That is what would restore confidence. And without it you will be whining about poor investment until the cows come home.

If this is the best that the RBA can do then it’s time we appoint The Pascometer as combined central bank governor and deputy and save ourselves the million dollars plus wasted on senior salaries.
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
newjez
Member Avatar


Very interesting.
http://www.smh.com.au/business/goldman-sachs-withdraws-prediction-of-a-cash-rate-cut-20140820-106a5w.html
Whenever you have an argument with someone, there comes a moment where you must ask yourself, whatever your political persuasion, 'am I the Nazi?'
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy