Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Reply
Tony is off to sign the deal to sell uranium to India
Topic Started: 18 Aug 2014, 05:55 PM (949 Views)
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
Mmmm, so it appears our PM will go to India to sign the deal to sell Uranium to India.

Now the question is, will the deal involve bringing back the nuclear waste to Muckaty Station (or somewhere) and if so, for what sort of revenues?

So much unsaid.... about this deal.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-18/australia-strikes-deal-to-send-uranium-to-india/5678258

Seems Ian was sent of a reco mission.... convenient time for him to hook into Muckaty?
August 13 - http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/federal-minister-to-visit-nts-muckaty/story-e6frfku9-1227023280477
August 16 - http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-14/muckaty-nuke-dump-process-a-disaster-minister/5669980
Does he mean millions or billions?
""It is worth millions and millions of dollars to whoever is successful," he said."

http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/plans-for-australia-to-become-worlds-nuclear-waste-dump,3343

They got to find somewhere quick as the first waste starts to return.

"Australian landowners are in the hunt for millions of dollars as the government searches for a place to dump 14 tonnes of nuclear waste.
The waste will return to Australia by the end of next year following treatment in France and the UK.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2014/08/18/03/46/hunt-for-hiding-place-for-14t-of-nuclear-waste-in-australia#6PjaKB6dd7VWrICC.99
Is it tens of millions for the successful landowner?
"The successful applicant could reportedly receive "tens of millions of dollars" for storing the waste on their land."


Just exactly how much are we charging to take the 14 tonnes?
Edited by ThePauk, 18 Aug 2014, 06:02 PM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


ThePauk
18 Aug 2014, 05:55 PM
Mmmm, so it appears our PM will go to India to sign the deal to sell Uranium to India.

Now the question is, will the deal involve bringing back the nuclear waste to Muckaty Station (or somewhere) and if so, for what sort of revenues?

So much unsaid.... about this deal.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-18/australia-strikes-deal-to-send-uranium-to-india/5678258

Seems Ian was sent of a reco mission.... convenient time for him to hook into Muckaty?
August 13 - http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/federal-minister-to-visit-nts-muckaty/story-e6frfku9-1227023280477
August 16 - http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-14/muckaty-nuke-dump-process-a-disaster-minister/5669980
Does he mean millions or billions?
""It is worth millions and millions of dollars to whoever is successful," he said."

http://www.independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/plans-for-australia-to-become-worlds-nuclear-waste-dump,3343

They got to find somewhere quick as the first waste starts to return.

"Australian landowners are in the hunt for millions of dollars as the government searches for a place to dump 14 tonnes of nuclear waste.
The waste will return to Australia by the end of next year following treatment in France and the UK.
Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/national/2014/08/18/03/46/hunt-for-hiding-place-for-14t-of-nuclear-waste-in-australia#6PjaKB6dd7VWrICC.99
Is it tens of millions for the successful landowner?
"The successful applicant could reportedly receive "tens of millions of dollars" for storing the waste on their land."


Just exactly how much are we charging to take the 14 tonnes?
My property is available ... LOL!
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Elastic
Member Avatar


Just don't let your neighbours know and move to Hawaii. Everything should be fine.
Only a rat can win a rat race.

Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
herbie
18 Aug 2014, 06:11 PM
My property is available ... LOL!
Herbs
Classic, I am sure you could did whole big enough....lol

Rumoured to be worth $100 billion in revenues.

The argument will be that we have a responsibility to store the waste, at a charge to the nation who sent it, as we sold the Uranium to them.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


ThePauk
18 Aug 2014, 09:19 PM
Herbs
Classic, I am sure you could did whole big enough....lol

Rumoured to be worth $100 billion in revenues.

The argument will be that we have a responsibility to store the waste, at a charge to the nation who sent it, as we sold the Uranium to them.
I fully expect the idea will get a guernsey one day Pauk. Given that:

* Uranium is one pretty obvious energy source the world isn't going to run out of, and

* Lots of Oz is pretty geologically stable, and

* Storing the waste will make us a pretty easy buck that we don't have to get all competitive to do.
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Will
Unregistered

Quote:
 
Now the question is, will the deal involve bringing back the nuclear waste to Muckaty Station (or somewhere) and if so, for what sort of revenues?


I have heard suggestions that we have 9 billion or so dollars of easy revenue going begging because we're too scared to take some nuclear waste onto our shores.

Once again we have the luck on our side with some great locations geologically, and a really low population density to help things along as well.

We do need to deal with the indigenous people to make it happen.
"REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
mango66
Member Avatar


Should store a bit in Abbots office. It might shrink those tumorous ears of his and make him look more like a chimpanzee.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
herbie
Member Avatar


Will
18 Aug 2014, 09:39 PM
We do need to deal with the indigenous people to make it happen.
Just how much might this sacred tree be worth?

As they say, Billy might be black, but Billy ain't silly.

And just who might Billy have acquired these thought processes from? - Given any assumption Billy wasn't just always pretty much as loot focussed as Willy all along ...
A Professional Demographer to an amateur demographer: "negative natural increase will never outweigh the positive net migration"
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
Ex BP Golly
Member Avatar


Unless we are at imminent risk of colliding risk New Zealand what would be wrong with burying nuclear waste under Canberra?

As soon as they nominate burying it under some remote Aboriginal community, you just know they are lying their guts out.
WHAT WOULD EDDIE DO? MAAAATE!
Share a cot with Milton?
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
ThePauk
Member Avatar
Diamond Member
herbie
18 Aug 2014, 10:18 PM
Just how much might this sacred tree be worth?

As they say, Billy might be black, but Billy ain't silly.

And just who might Billy have acquired these thought processes from? - Given any assumption Billy wasn't just always pretty much as loot focussed as Willy all along ...
Herbs
It seems quite clear that the federal govt is going to tender for private landholders. My guess is it could be worth $1 billion to the landholder. The other surrounding issues will be about is location and proximity to the Haliburton railway and the U.S. Subs that are bringing the waste back to Darwin.

My guess is now it will exclude any real revenues to the Aboriginal land holders, if the dump is not on their land.

Golly
I think originally the Mukaty site was thought to be the best location. Dick C told John Howard that it was between Israel and Australia. Johnny came on board early.
Edited by ThePauk, 19 Aug 2014, 01:06 PM.
Profile "REPLY WITH QUOTE" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Learn More · Sign-up Now
« Previous Topic · Australian Property Forum · Next Topic »
Reply



Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.

Forum Rules: The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.

Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy