House prices have grown faster in England since late 1973 than almost all other European countries
By Allister Heath 05 Aug 2014
It is the question we all want an answer to – why, oh why, are British homes so expensive? It is not just in London that they are so pricey, costing an ever-rising multiple of the average annual salary, but also in many other urban centres and in large swathes of rural Britain. New research reveals that house prices have grown faster in England since late 1973 than in almost all other European countries.
So what is going on? The problem is clearly that there is too little supply, given the demand and the growing population. But why? There are two possible kinds of constraints.
The first are regulatory: rules that make it difficult for new homes to be built, stringent planning regulation and other legislative constraints which mean that price increases don’t lead to an increase in supply, unlike in other markets. The second kind are natural and physical: a scarcity of land, for example, or an uneven topography that makes it very hard to build.
So which of the two factors are most important in the case of the UK? And what would happen to prices in their absence? Christian A. L. Hilber of the London School of Economics and Wouter Vermeulen of the CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis have just produced a dispassionate analysis of the problem, which will be published shortly in the Economic Journal.
They find that house prices in England would have risen by about 100 percentage points fewer, after adjusting for consumer price inflation, from 1974 to 2008, in the absence of regulatory constraints to housebuilding. In other words, they would have shot up from £79,000 to £147,000, instead of £226,000. Another way of putting this is that prices would have been 35pc cheaper.
Had the south-east of England, in practice the most regulated English region, been as liberal as the North East, the least regulated over the past 40 years, house prices would still have been roughly 25pc lower. As it happens, the authors aren’t necessarily advocating deregulation: they are trying to calculate, using sophisticated econometric techniques and a wealth of detailed data, the effect of constraints.
What about the physical restrictions? In a hypothetical world where they could be magicked away, prices would be 15pc today lower than they would otherwise have been. The majority of these constraints can be felt in highly urbanised areas, for obvious reasons: there is not as much space available in city centres and lots in the countryside. Some parts of the country are easier to build on than others.
So the lesson is clear: prices would have risen even had we still been governed by the liberal planning framework of the 1930s, but by much less. The impact of regulations on prices is relatively recent; they started to have an effect by the 1970s and have played a much greater role in the past 20 years.
The paper also reports on other fascinating findings. The estimated “regulatory tax” in the City of Westminster in central London exceeds 800pc of marginal construction costs. Regulatory constraints are very important in the prosperous provincial town of Reading; meanwhile, in Newcastle and Darlington house prices are barely moved by supply constraints.
None of this is rocket science. Prices are determined by supply and demand. People want to live where there are jobs; these days, this means that there is a huge amount of demand in London and its commuter belt. The government says that it wants to move economic activity to the North, and announced its Northern Powerhouse plan yesterday; but these sorts of artificial activity-shifting schemes have a history of failing. House building finally seems to be creeping up, partly as a result of the Coalition’s reforms in the area, but not by enough to make a big difference. House prices will continue to rise - until the next crash, that is.
UK House prices went mental after Margaret Thatcher introduced the "right to buy" scheme where council house residents could buy their homes for up to a 60% discount. She also stopped local councils from using the proceeds to build replacement homes for rent.
This greatly reduced the stock of public owned rental property. At the same time, Thatcher also introduced a change to the housing benefit rules so that councils would pay the rent of benefit claimants to private sector landlords. She also made it allowable for the unemployed to move to a different area without losing benefits.
This kicked off an investment buying frenzy and also pushed more young people into buying where before they would have just gone on the council list.
The early 80's also saw the rise of the endowment mortgage system. You borrow the principal and pay interest only for 25 years and offset that with an investment that will mature to cover the principal on maturity. Most of these endowments were rip offs with little if any prospect of maturing and covering the original loan, but they reduced the cost of borrowing and pushed prices up further.
Britain has had its fair share of crashes over the years and many have been wiped out in the process.
Matthew, 30 Jan 2016, 09:21 AM Your simplistic view is so flawed it is not worth debating. The current oversupply will be swallowed in 12 months. By the time dumb shits like you realise this prices will already be rising.
The British govt is so far up the arse of the 'City' of London and the banking oligarchs that the whole country revolves around the decisions of the bankers. 'More of the same' economic policies is the outcome of this, ie more lending for housing pushing prices up. George Osbourne was rubbing his hands together last year spruiking that what 'we' really would like now is another housing boom (meaning of course, house price boom) to get the economy back on track. housepricecrash web site is full of the opposite view of of course.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy