The minutes of the Reserve Bank board meeting on July 1 provided a mild surprise by not “strengthening” any of the language around the Australia dollar compared to the June minutes. The key sentence was: “The exchange rate remained high by historical standards, particularly given the declines in key commodity prices, and was offering less assistance than it otherwise might in achieving balanced growth in the economy”.
Contrast that with the Governor’s speech on July 3, “When judged against current and likely future trends in the terms of trade, and Australia’s still high costs of production relative to those elsewhere in the world, most measurements would say it is overvalued, and not by just a few cents”.
That was indeed strong language and had an impact on the AUD. It fell from USD 94.40 to USD 93.90 in immediate response to the speech.
It was announced shortly after the speech that retail sales in May had fallen by a surprising 0.5% and the April print was revised down to -0.1% from 0.2%. That produced another fall to USD 0.9340.
However, subsequently the AUD rallied back to USD 0.9400 – arguably retracing all of the 50c loss generated by the Governor’s strong words.
That result is in strong contrast to the Bank’s success in “talking down” the AUD late last year. Recall that following the Board meeting of November 5 the Governor described the AUD as “uncomfortably” high. At that time the AUD stood at USD 0.95. That strong language supplemented the soft easing bias which had been in place since the rate cut in August.
Each set of minutes from August noted that “Members (of the Board) agreed that the Bank should again neither close off the possibility of reducing rates further nor signal an imminent intention to reduce them”.
On it’s own the “soft” easing bias did not help in holding down the AUD. When it was first introduced at the August Board meeting the AUD was around USD 0.89. By the time of the November 5 Board meeting the AUD had lifted to USD 0.95.
It seems that the combination of the easing bias AND the strong language was successful in bringing down the AUD. From the November board meeting to the February meeting (when the policy combination was abandoned) the AUD had fallen from USD 0.95 to USD 0.87.
The decision to drop the “uncomfortably high” description and the easing bias following the February Board saw the AUD “recover” back to USD 0.95 by early June.
It seems that a combination of strong language and a preparedness to back it up with policy (easing bias) has been the only effective combination to contain the AUD.
Prior to the November Board meeting, the easing bias, on its own, had limited effect. Recently the Governor has used strong language, particularly in the speech on July 3 but, without a supporting policy change there has been little impact.
(To be fair other factors have also been at play. Low volatility encouraging the “carry trade” has also supported the AUD. But of course the disappointment for the RBA since the February board must be further intensified by the 30% fall in the iron ore price since the beginning of the year.)
So with strong language not working independently of a policy shift is there any chance that the Governor could revert back to an easing bias?
There was a modest signal on that issue in the July minutes. Language around the rate outlook was “modified” from “current accommodative stance of policy was likely to be appropriate for some time yet” to “the most prudent course was likely to be a period of stability in interest rates” – arguably an implied shortening of the “on hold” period. The July minutes also excluded the sentence (used in June): “Those uncertainties were likely to take some time to resolve”.
But this subtle change is hardly an easing bias.
To gauge this possibility we can look to the reason why the easing bias and strong language was dropped at the February meeting – underlying inflation printed 0.9% in the December quarter from 0.65% in the September quarter – the sharp increase was attributed to the fall in the AUD in 2013 – the risk was that further falls in the AUD might jeopardise the inflation strategy.
Based on the Bank’s revised inflation forecasts in the February Statement on Monetary Policy we estimate that the Bank expected a print of 0.8% for underlying inflation for the March quarter. It would have been pleasantly surprised with soft 0.55%.
A very low inflation number for the June quarter which prints next week might embolden the Bank to restore its easing bias.
After all the market is now pricing in a 60% probability of a 25 bp rate cut by early 2015 and consumer spending and housing have lost momentum, largely because of the confidence drag from the Federal Budget.
We do not think that the inflation print will be low enough to accommodate that change in strategy.
We are forecasting a 0.7% increase in underlying inflation for the June quarter. That read would see annual underlying inflation at 2.8% for the year to June – firmly in the upper half of the target range and showing no encouraging downward trend.
The best way to assess the December quarter 0.9% print on the trimmed mean (preferred measure of underlying inflation) followed by the 0.5% for the March quarter is that both numbers had some “noise” and the 2 quarter pace of 1.4% is the appropriate way to assess the trend. With the September quarter 2013 printing 0.7% the clear message is that underlying inflation is running at a steady pace of 2.8% – up from 2.3% in the previous year and hardly scope for justifying an easing bias.
Conclusion
The Bank’s experience with “talking down” the AUD points to the need to combine policy with strong language. Next week’s inflation print is unlikely to accommodate that easing bias.
Further attempts by the Governor to talk down the AUD without backing it up with policy are likely to prove as unsuccessful as we have seen in the recent past.
Notwithstanding this rather bleak assessment of the success of “jawboning” policy we do expect the AUD to lose some momentum through 2014 (USD 0.90 “target” for year’s end) in lagged response to the sharp falls in commodity prices in the first half of 2014; some lift in volatility which will discourage carry trades; and around a 5% lift in the USD Index.
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy