So you believe that the previous warming may have been caused by oceans releasing heat, rather than by humans emitting CO2?
Why is it an all or nothing prospect for you?
I don't think I've ever read anyone saying that humanity is the only driver of the climate.
"If man is to survive, he will have learned to take a delight in the essential differences between men and between cultures. He will learn that differences in ideas and attitudes are a delight, part of life's exciting variety, not something to fear." - Gene Roddenberry
"Balloon animals are a great way to teach children that the things they love dearly, may spontaneously explode" -- Lee Camp
So you believe that the previous warming may have been caused by oceans releasing heat, rather than by humans emitting CO2?
stop putting words in my mouth strawman ... ( and it doesnt matter what i believe.. )
edit ( this is all my layman, high school science understanding )
the heat from oceans didnt magically appear in the water to warm up the atmosphere, though heat IS transferred to and from the oceans causing variations in atmospheric temperatures ... HOWEVER, we are still seeing an increase in global temperatures, not simply a transfer .. so the question is why ?
Sceintists are telling us CO2 and other greenhouse gasses are trapping more and more heat in the atmosphere before it has a chance to bounce back into to space.. Currently La Nina winds are forcing up cool, deep water that is taking this extra heat and distributing it into the ocean ( while our CO2 is continuing to trap more heat that would have otherwise escaped into space )
What this means is a net heat gain, that may well not have been occuring to the same extent had we not pumped all this shit in our atmosphere to trap the heat in the first place. If all this theory is correct ( and there is a LOT of science behind it ) when this ocean cooling effect is over, there is going to be a ton of heat dumped back into our atmosphere..
Your theory has been debunked but you can't accept that.
First you said I accepted my theory has been debunked. Now you say I can't accept it has been debunked?
What theory are you referring to anyway, and where was it debunked?
Massive
27 Jun 2014, 07:37 PM
we are still seeing an increase in global temperatures, not simply a transfer
We're not seeing an increase in atmospheric temperatures, so if you believe we are seeing an increase in global temperatures despite no increase in atmospheric temperatures, then you must believe there IS a transfer - i.e. the warming that was previously making atmospheric temperatures rise must have been transferred elsewhere (e.g. the oceans)?
Quote:
Currently La Nina winds are forcing up cool, deep water that is taking this extra heat and distributing it into the ocean
If that were true, then couldn't the earlier rise in temperatures be attributed to the reverse phenomenon - i.e. El Nino and positive phase decadal variation forcing heat out of the ocean?
Also, La Nina is a fairly regular occurrence (every few years), so why is it that recent La Nina is responsible for the past two decades of non-warming, when over the prior 100 years the La Nina's did not interrupt global warming?
This is the equivalent of a small child putting his hands over his hears and shouting 'LALALALALA' to drown out anything he doesn't want to hear.
You are doing exactly what you accuse the 'deniers' of doing - i.e. refusing to be educated, and ignoring new data.
As new data comes out, it destroys the false theories and predictions that the alarmists have been spruiking for years.
The tide of data and public opinion is increasingly turning against the alarmists.
Global temperatures haven't been rising for two decades, and Antarctic sea ice coverage is at record levels, debunking the myth that the warming is now hiding in the oceans. Over the next few decades global temperatures will be trending down. It will be very amusing to watch the alarmists spin this cooling as just another 'counter-intuitive sign' of man made global warming.
And here is you refusing to be educated.
You are adamant that because temperatures haven't been rising for twenty years there has been no global warming.
Now that it has been shown that it is very possible to introduce more heat without a rise in temperature your assertion or theory is certainly not absolutely true is it.
It's got more holes in it than the Titanic.
Quote:
First you said I accepted my theory was debunked. Now you say I can't accept it has been debunked?
What theory are you referring to anyway, and where was it debunked?
It was the one above and it has been shown to be very questionable, hasn't it. A few pages ago you were relying on it as your centrepiece, now it's in shreds.
You are adamant that because temperatures haven't been rising for twenty years there has been no global warming
I'm adamant there has been no atmospheric warming, which was the IPCC's original method for determining global warming.
Of course that was before the IPCC realised atmospheric warming had stopped and decided the warming must be hiding in the ocean now.
The IPCC predictions (refer to chart below) were based on atmospheric warming...
The IPCC now concede they got it wrong.
There is also no evidence that the oceans are getting warmer. In fact they are getting colder, and global sea ice coverage hasn't really changed in 30 years...
NSIDC/NASA AMSR-E also shows that the overall trend of ocean temperatures since 2002 is one of cooling in spite of a recent short lived El NiƱo warming event:
I'm adamant there has been no atmospheric warming, which was the IPCC's original method for determining global warming.
Of course that was before the IPCC realised atmospheric warming had stopped and decided the warming must be hiding in the ocean now.
The IPCC predictions (refer to chart below) were based on atmospheric warming...
The IPCC now concede they got it wrong.
There is also no evidence that the oceans are getting warmer. In fact they are getting colder, and global sea ice cover hasn't really changed.
But it's not an IPCC chart, it's a mangled version of the Ed Hawkins original. The IPCC admitted nothing, David Rose thought he could get away with making misquotes, taking people out of context and so on, that you have taken hook, line and sinker.
Here's an updated original, from Ed Hawkins...
Notice how observational uncertainty shows that the observed temperatures could be either, just inside the projections, or just inside the 25-75% Confidence band? Not even close to a "Spectacular Miscalculation"
"If man is to survive, he will have learned to take a delight in the essential differences between men and between cultures. He will learn that differences in ideas and attitudes are a delight, part of life's exciting variety, not something to fear." - Gene Roddenberry
"Balloon animals are a great way to teach children that the things they love dearly, may spontaneously explode" -- Lee Camp
and you're quite entitled to hold that belief, as others are entitled to disagree with you.
I'm just telling you what the data says.
The data says there has been no atmospheric warming for two decades, that sea temperatures are falling, and that sea ice coverage has barely changed in 30 years.
The logical conclusion is that it's not getting warmer.
To claim that it is actually getting warmer despite falling sea temperatures and stable atmospheric temperatures requires some pretty convoluted reasoning.
The simple answer is probably the most sensible one - i.e. the reason why the data shows no warming is because there is no warming.
Kulganis
27 Jun 2014, 10:09 PM
The IPCC admitted nothing
Here are some quotes directly from the IPCC's own report...
'the occurrence of the hiatus in GMST trend during the past 15 years raises the two related questions of what has caused it and whether climate models are able to reproduce it'
'During the 15-year period beginning in 1998, the ensemble of HadCRUT4 GMST trends lies below almost all model-simulated trends'
'Almost all CMIP5 historical simulations do not reproduce the observed recent warming hiatus'
They got it wrong, and they admitted they got it wrong.
'the occurrence of the hiatus in GMST trend during the past 15 years raises the two related questions of what has caused it and whether climate models are able to reproduce it'
'During the 15-year period beginning in 1998, the ensemble of HadCRUT4 GMST trends lies below almost all model-simulated trends'
'Almost all CMIP5 historical simulations do not reproduce the observed recent warming hiatus'
They got it wrong, and they admitted they got it wrong.
I see no admission that they got everything wrong, I see that they are admitting that some of the models they used were not as accurate as they had hoped, but so?
Quote:
'Almost all CMIP5 historical simulations do not reproduce the observed recent warming hiatus'
Notice the 'Almost' in there? Does that mean all their projections were wrong?
"If man is to survive, he will have learned to take a delight in the essential differences between men and between cultures. He will learn that differences in ideas and attitudes are a delight, part of life's exciting variety, not something to fear." - Gene Roddenberry
"Balloon animals are a great way to teach children that the things they love dearly, may spontaneously explode" -- Lee Camp
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy