Apartment tenants in Canberra have sued their landlord for faulty air conditioning they said led to sleepless nights and killed their goldfish.
The tenants signed a 12-month rental agreement for the apartment in September 2012.
They told the Civil and Administrative Tribunal the air conditioning had never worked properly, there were security problems, and despite being told Foxtel was connected, it was not.
The air conditioning turned itself off every 20 minutes, causing sleepless nights during a hot summer and killing their goldfish.
The tribunal heard the tenants telephoned the agent to complain about the faulty air conditioning in September 2012 and followed it up with an email on December 10.
The air conditioning was not repaired until March this year.
While the tribunal was not satisfied the heat caused the death of the fish, they found the air conditioning problem was a breach of the landlord’s obligations.
The tenants were awarded $4,000 including compensation for the lack of the pay TV connection.
What a load of bullshit I have goldfish (they are a better investment than real gold) I live in QLD which gets quite hot and I have no air con. Every year I go overseas for a few months at a time and the goldfish get a few feed blocks thrown in and are still swimming happily when we come back We still have some that have been around for about 5 years now.
We did lose some once, particular cold mornings did it in my opinion.
Ignore posts by The Whole Truth · View Post · End Ignoring The forum fuckwit goes RRRAAARRRGGHHhhh - But not a fuck was given..................by anyone.
What a load of bullshit I have goldfish (they are a better investment than real gold) I live in QLD which gets quite hot and I have no air con. Every year I go overseas for a few months at a time and the goldfish get a few feed blocks thrown in and are still swimming happily when we come back We still have some that have been around for about 5 years now.
We did lose some once, particular cold mornings did it in my opinion.
The goldfish bit is clearly BS and obviously the tribunal agreed, the AC isn't though.
Quote:
The tenants presented evidence during December 2012 and January 2013 that more than half of the days had temperatures above 30 degrees Celsius.
So there were 31 days above 30. That's $130 per day compensation for not having AC! There's the foxtel issue and they might have wanted to use the AC as heating during some of that period. Still $4k compo seems huge to me. I would have expected something like no more than $1k compo. Maybe there is more to the story than the article says.
The ability of LLs and tenants to go to a tribunal to seek redress for breaches of a lease are important. But from stories I hear they often are very very tenant friendly, to the point of not even following rules. I might start another thread on people's experiences of tribunals.
6 months of LL foot-dragging (Sept - Mar) before a repair to a substantial feature of the rental is finally conducted? $4K seems about right.
The goldfish is a furphy, a hook for the story rather than a substantive issue.
The rest of the OP article describes the underlying issue well:
General manager of property management at Harris Property Management Suzie Hamilton-Flanagan said such situations were not uncommon.
Each state had its own legislation around a landlord's obligation to repair defects in their property.
"Tenants can take landlords to the Residential Tenancies Tribunal and can successfully claim for rent reduction for the time that the property did not have the air conditioning operating in their rental property. This is not an unusual practice," she said.
"As property managers, our role is to report maintenance and request the landlord’s approval to repair the property. But should this approval not be given, we can not proceed with maintenance or we will be liable for the account.
"If property managers are to meet best practice, they have to clearly explain these legislative requirements to the landlord and highlight their responsibilities under the act.
"They need to make it clear that should they not approve maintenance, they face the consequence that a tenant can take them to the Residential Tenancies Tribunal to get a resolution."[emphasis added]
Australian Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Australian and global real estate markets and macroeconomics, including house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a property crash. Is there an Australian housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is the Australian property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices really rise forever? These are the questions we address on Australian Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators. Members may also discuss matters related to finance, modern monetary theory (MMT), debt deflation, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin Ethereum and Ripple, property investing, landlords, tenants, debt consolidation, reverse home equity loans, the housing shortage, negative gearing, capital gains tax, land tax and macro prudential regulation.
Forum Rules:
The main forum may be used to discuss property, politics, economics and finance, precious metals, crypto currency, debt management, generational divides, climate change, sustainability, alternative energy, environmental topics, human rights or social justice issues, and other topics on a case by case basis. Topics unsuitable for the main forum may be discussed in the lounge. You agree you won't use this forum to post material that is illegal, private, defamatory, pornographic, excessively abusive or profane, threatening, or invasive of another forum member's privacy. Don't post NSFW content. Racist or ethnic slurs and homophobic comments aren't tolerated. Accusing forum members of serious crimes is not permitted. Accusations, attacks, abuse or threats, litigious or otherwise, directed against the forum or forum administrators aren't tolerated and will result in immediate suspension of your account for a number of days depending on the severity of the attack. No spamming or advertising in the main forum. Spamming includes repeating the same message over and over again within a short period of time. Don't post ALL CAPS thread titles. The Advertising and Promotion Subforum may be used to promote your Australian property related business or service. Active members of the forum who contribute regularly to main forum discussions may also include a link to their product or service in their signature block. Members are limited to one actively posting account each. A secondary account may be used solely for the purpose of maintaining a blog as long as that account no longer posts in threads. Any member who believes another member has violated these rules may report the offending post using the report button.
Australian Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. Australian Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. Australian Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. It is not permitted for any Australian Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. It is not permitted for Australian Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.
Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.
This site may contain copyright material (i.e. attributed snippets from online news reports), the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.
Privacy Policy: Australian Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to Australian Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ
Australian Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy